Morita Tatsuya, Ikenaga Masayuki, Adachi Isamu, Narabayashi Itaru, Kizawa Yoshiyuki, Honke Yoshifumi, Kohara Hiroyuki, Mukaiyama Taketo, Akechi Tatsuo, Uchitomi Yosuke
Seirei Hospice, Seirei Mikatabara Hospital, Hamamatsu, Japan.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2004 Dec;28(6):557-65. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2004.03.004.
Symptomatic sedation is often required in terminally ill cancer patients, and could cause significant distress to their family. The aims of this study were to clarify the family experience during palliative sedation therapy, including their satisfaction and distress levels, and the determinants of family dissatisfaction and high-level distress. A multicenter questionnaire survey assessed 280 bereaved families of cancer patients who received sedation in 7 palliative care units in Japan. A total of 185 responses were analyzed(response rate, 73%). The families reported that 69% of the patients were considerably or very distressed before sedation. Fifty-five percent of the patients expressed an explicit wish for sedation, and 89% of families were clearly informed. Overall, 78% of the families were satisfied with the treatment, whereas 25% expressed a high level of emotional distress. The independent determinants of low levels of family satisfaction were: poor symptom palliation after sedation, insufficient information-giving, concerns that sedation might shorten the patient's life, and feelings that there might be other ways to achieve symptom relief The independent determinants of high levels of family distress were: poor symptom palliation after sedation, feeling the burden of responsibility for the decision, feeling unprepared for changes in the patient's condition, feeling that the physicians and nurses were not sufficiently compassionate, and shorter interval to patient death. Palliative sedation therapy was principally performed to relieve severe suffering based on family and patient consent. Although the majority of families were comfortable with this practice, clinicians should minimize family distress by regular monitoring of patient distress and timely modification of sedation protocols, providing sufficient information, sharing the responsibility of the decision, facilitating grief and providing emotional support.
终末期癌症患者常常需要进行症状性镇静,这可能会给其家人带来极大困扰。本研究的目的是阐明姑息性镇静治疗期间患者家属的经历,包括他们的满意度和困扰程度,以及家属不满和高度困扰的决定因素。一项多中心问卷调查评估了在日本7家姑息治疗单位接受镇静治疗的280名癌症患者的 bereaved 家属。共分析了185份回复(回复率73%)。家属报告称,69%的患者在镇静前相当痛苦或非常痛苦。55%的患者明确表示希望进行镇静,89%的家属得到了明确告知。总体而言,78%的家属对治疗感到满意,而25%表示有高度的情绪困扰。家属满意度低的独立决定因素包括:镇静后症状缓解不佳、信息提供不足、担心镇静可能缩短患者生命以及认为可能有其他缓解症状的方法。家属高度困扰的独立决定因素包括:镇静后症状缓解不佳、感到对决策负有责任、对患者病情变化没有准备、觉得医生和护士缺乏足够同情心以及患者死亡间隔较短。姑息性镇静治疗主要是在患者家属和患者同意的基础上进行,以缓解严重痛苦。尽管大多数家属对这种做法感到安心,但临床医生应通过定期监测患者痛苦并及时修改镇静方案、提供充分信息、分担决策责任、促进悲伤情绪的缓解并提供情感支持,将家属的困扰降至最低。