• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种无针静脉输液通路系统的评估

Evaluation of a needle-free intravenous access system.

作者信息

Beason R, Bourguignon J, Fowler D, Gardner C

出版信息

J Intraven Nurs. 1992 Jan-Feb;15(1):11-6.

PMID:1564595
Abstract

Needle-stick injuries are one of the most severe hazards faced by nurses today. The most physically and emotionally devastating type of injury is from a needle contaminated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), but far more likely to occur is infection with other blood-borne pathogens, especially hepatitis B. The daily threat of needle-stick injuries adds yet another dimension of concern to the stresses inherent in working in a health care facility. Health care workers at greatest risk are those who manipulate needles and draw blood samples on a regular basis. With this concern in mind, a study was launched to evaluate a needle-free I.V. access system with respect to the following research objectives: 1) to assess the prevention/reduction of needle-stick risks and injuries; 2) to identify associated reduction in expenses; 3) to implement product and ease of use; and 4) to assess nursing satisfaction levels. This article describes the methodology used and the results of the study.

摘要

针刺伤是当今护士面临的最严重危害之一。身体和情感上最具破坏性的伤害类型是被人类免疫缺陷病毒(HIV)污染的针头造成的,但更有可能发生的是感染其他血源性病原体,尤其是乙型肝炎。针刺伤的日常威胁给在医疗机构工作所固有的压力又增添了一个令人担忧的层面。面临最大风险的医护人员是那些经常操作针头和采集血样的人员。出于这种担忧,开展了一项研究,以评估一种无针静脉输液接入系统,其研究目标如下:1)评估预防/减少针刺风险和伤害;2)确定相关的费用降低情况;3)评估产品及其易用性;4)评估护士的满意度。本文描述了所使用的方法和研究结果。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of a needle-free intravenous access system.一种无针静脉输液通路系统的评估
J Intraven Nurs. 1992 Jan-Feb;15(1):11-6.
2
Needle stick injuries: nurses at risk.针刺伤:面临风险的护士。
Mich Nurse. 2000 Mar;73(3):8-9.
3
A comparison between two intermittent intravenous systems without needles.
J Intraven Nurs. 1994 Sep-Oct;17(5):256-60.
4
[Incidence of a needle stick injury occurring in a needleless intravenous system].[无针静脉输液系统中发生针刺伤的发生率]
Masui. 2008 May;57(5):635-6.
5
Knowledge, attitude and practices among health care workers on needle-stick injuries.医护人员对针刺伤的认知、态度及行为
Kathmandu Univ Med J (KUMJ). 2003 Apr-Jun;1(2):91-4.
6
Needle stick injuries among nurses in sub-Saharan Africa.撒哈拉以南非洲地区护士的针刺伤
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Aug;10(8):773-81. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2005.01453.x.
7
Hazard report: risk of needlestick injuries from failure of shielded i.v. catheters.危险报告:带护套静脉留置针故障导致针刺伤的风险。
Healthc Hazard Manage Monit. 2002 Feb;15(6):1-2.
8
Emergency prophylaxis following needle-stick injuries and sexual exposures: results from a survey comparing New York Emergency Department practitioners with their national colleagues.针刺伤和性暴露后的紧急预防:一项比较纽约急诊科医生与其全国同行的调查结果
Mt Sinai J Med. 2003 Oct;70(5):338-43.
9
A follow-up evaluation to a needle-free i.v. system.对一种无针静脉输液系统的随访评估。
Nurs Manage. 1994 Dec;25(12):33-5.
10
Needle stick injuries in nurses at a tertiary health care facility.三级医疗保健机构护士的针刺伤
J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad. 2010 Jul-Sep;22(3):174-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Use of safety-engineered devices by healthcare workers for intravenous and/or phlebotomy procedures in healthcare settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医护人员在医疗机构中使用安全工程设备进行静脉注射和/或静脉穿刺操作:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Sep 1;16:458. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1705-y.
2
Safety engineered injection devices for intramuscular, subcutaneous and intradermal injections in healthcare delivery settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.医疗机构中用于肌内、皮下和皮内注射的安全工程注射装置:系统评价与荟萃分析
BMC Nurs. 2015 Dec 30;14:71. doi: 10.1186/s12912-015-0119-1. eCollection 2015.