• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

应得性判断:正义与成就心理学研究

Judgments of deservingness: studies in the psychology of justice and achievement.

作者信息

Feather N T

机构信息

School of Psychology, The Flinders University of South Australia, Adelaide, Australia.

出版信息

Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(2):86-107. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_1.

DOI:10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_1
PMID:15647142
Abstract

This article presents a review and conceptual analysis of the concept of deservingness that incorporates the effects of personal values, perceived responsibility, ingroup-outgroup relations, and like-dislike relations. Selected studies show that reactions to another's success or failure and to the rise or fall of "tall poppies" or high achievers depends on the degree to which the positive or negative outcome is seen to be deserved; that individual differences in personal values and in value syndromes may be assumed to affect deservingness via the subjective values assigned to actions and outcomes; that group membership, status, interpersonal liking-disliking, and perceived moral character also affect judgments of deservingness; and that deservingness is a key variable that mediates how observers react to penalties imposed on the perpetrators of different kinds of offense. It is argued that the inclusion of deservingness goes beyond approaches in which perceived responsibility is accorded central status by adding a further link in the causal chain, thus enabling a more complete consideration of the effects of justice and value variables on how people react to positive and negative outcomes for both self and other.

摘要

本文对应得概念进行了综述和概念分析,该分析纳入了个人价值观、感知责任、内群体-外群体关系以及喜欢-不喜欢关系的影响。部分研究表明,对他人成功或失败以及对“出头鸟”或高成就者兴衰的反应,取决于正面或负面结果被视为应得的程度;个人价值观和价值综合征的个体差异可能会通过赋予行动和结果的主观价值来影响应得性;群体成员身份、地位、人际喜欢-不喜欢以及感知到的道德品质也会影响应得性判断;并且应得性是一个关键变量,它介导观察者对不同类型犯罪的犯罪者所受惩罚的反应。有人认为,纳入应得性超越了将感知责任置于核心地位的方法,通过在因果链中增加一个进一步的环节,从而能够更全面地考虑正义和价值变量对人们如何对自身和他人的正面和负面结果做出反应的影响。

相似文献

1
Judgments of deservingness: studies in the psychology of justice and achievement.应得性判断:正义与成就心理学研究
Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 1999;3(2):86-107. doi: 10.1207/s15327957pspr0302_1.
2
Reactions to penalties for an offense in relation to authoritarianism, values, perceived responsibility, perceived seriousness, and deservingness.
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 Sep;71(3):571-87. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.71.3.571.
3
The Roles of Disliking, Deservingness, and Envy in Predicting Schadenfreude.厌恶、应得感和嫉妒在预测幸灾乐祸中的作用。
Psychol Rep. 2021 Jun;124(3):1220-1236. doi: 10.1177/0033294120921358. Epub 2020 May 5.
4
The impact of deservingness on schadenfreude and sympathy: further evidence.应得感对幸灾乐祸和同情的影响:进一步的证据
J Soc Psychol. 2009 Jun;149(3):390-2. doi: 10.3200/SOCP.149.3.390-392.
5
Attitudes towards high achievers in sport: an adaptation of Feather's Tall Poppy Scale.对体育领域高成就者的态度:费瑟“高罂粟花量表”的改编版
J Sci Med Sport. 2001 Sep;4(3):310-23. doi: 10.1016/s1440-2440(01)80040-2.
6
Welfare deservingness opinions from heuristic to measurable concept: The CARIN deservingness principles scale.从启发式概念到可衡量概念的福利资格意见:CARIN 福利资格原则量表。
Soc Sci Res. 2020 Jan;85:102352. doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.102352. Epub 2019 Sep 3.
7
Justice for the average Joe: the role of envy and the mentalizing network in the deservingness of others' misfortunes.为普通人伸张正义:嫉妒的作用和心理化网络在他人不幸中的应得感。
Soc Neurosci. 2013;8(6):640-9. doi: 10.1080/17470919.2013.846278. Epub 2013 Oct 18.
8
Getting "just deserts" or seeing the "silver lining": the relation between judgments of immanent and ultimate justice.得到“应有的惩罚”还是看到“一线希望”:内在正义与终极正义判断之间的关系。
PLoS One. 2014 Jul 18;9(7):e101803. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101803. eCollection 2014.
9
Reasoning about interpersonal responsibility when making judgments about scenarios depicting close personal relationships.
Psychol Rep. 2002 Jun;90(3 Pt 1):723-42. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.3.723.
10
Generalization of positive and negative attitudes toward individuals to outgroup attitudes.将对个体的积极和消极态度泛化到对外群体的态度。
Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2013 May;39(5):608-22. doi: 10.1177/0146167213480890. Epub 2013 Mar 6.

引用本文的文献

1
How can ethical leadership increase employees' bootlegging innovation behavior in China?: a serial mediation model of psychological wellbeing and psychological entitlement.在中国,道德领导如何增加员工的非正式创新行为?:一个关于心理健康和心理权利的连环中介模型。
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 4;16:1506906. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1506906. eCollection 2025.
2
"Snapping, sharing and receiving blame": A systematic review on psychosocial factors of victim blaming in non-consensual pornography.“推诿、分担与归咎责任”:关于非自愿色情内容中受害者归咎心理社会因素的系统综述
Ind Psychiatry J. 2024 Jan-Jun;33(1):3-12. doi: 10.4103/ipj.ipj_166_23. Epub 2024 Feb 16.
3
"Deservingness" and Public Support for Universal Public Goods: A Survey Experiment.
“应得性”与对公共物品的公众支持:一项调查实验
Public Opin Q. 2023 Apr 3;87(1):44-68. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfad007. eCollection 2023 Spring.
4
Moral Dilemmas in Hospitals: Which Shooting Victim Should Be Saved?医院中的道德困境:应该救哪一位枪击受害者?
Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 25;13:770020. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.770020. eCollection 2022.
5
The Role of Subjective and Objective Social Status in the Generation of Envy.主观和客观社会地位在嫉妒产生中的作用。
Front Psychol. 2020 Dec 15;11:513495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.513495. eCollection 2020.
6
Moral judgements of fairness-related actions are flexibly updated to account for contextual information.公平相关行为的道德判断会灵活更新,以考虑到上下文信息。
Sci Rep. 2020 Oct 20;10(1):17828. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-74975-0.
7
Why did she send it in the first place? Victim blame in the context of 'revenge porn'.她当初为什么要发送它呢?“报复性色情”背景下的受害者归咎现象。
Psychiatr Psychol Law. 2020 Jun 11;27(3):386-396. doi: 10.1080/13218719.2020.1734977. eCollection 2020.
8
Compensate a little, but punish a lot: Asymmetric routes to restoring justice.补偿一点,但惩罚很多:恢复正义的非对称途径。
PLoS One. 2019 Jan 10;14(1):e0210676. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0210676. eCollection 2019.
9
Schadenfreude is higher in real-life situations compared to hypothetical scenarios.与假设情况相比,现实生活中的幸灾乐祸程度更高。
PLoS One. 2018 Oct 11;13(10):e0205595. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0205595. eCollection 2018.
10
Supporting the Accommodation of Voluntary and Involuntary Migrants: Humanitarian and Host Society Considerations.
Soc Psychol Personal Sci. 2018 Apr;9(3):267-274. doi: 10.1177/1948550617737600. Epub 2018 Mar 23.