Suppr超能文献

镇静期间对各种刺激反应的预测:三种脑电图变量的比较

Prediction of responses to various stimuli during sedation: a comparison of three EEG variables.

作者信息

Doi Matsuyuki, Morita Koji, Mantzaridis Haralambos, Sato Shigehito, Kenny Gavin N C

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jan;31(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2516-x. Epub 2004 Dec 1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of the aepEX, a derivative of auditory evoked potentials, the bispectral index, and SEF95% to predict responses to various stimuli.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

General Intensive Care Unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Forty postsurgical, mechanically ventilated patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Target concentrations of blood propofol were randomly set at 0.5 microg/ml, 1.0 microg/ml, 1.5 microg/ml, and 2.0 microg/ml, with a fixed fentanyl infusion rate between 0.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1) and 1.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1).

MEASUREMENTS

Depth of sedation was subjectively assessed with the Ramsay Sedation Score. The aepEX was recorded using an auditory evoked potentials system. The bispectral index and SEF95% were measured using an Aspect A-1000 monitor.

RESULTS

The aepEX, bispectral index, and SEF95% correlated with the Ramsay Sedation Score, the Pk value being greatest for the aepEX, followed by the bispectral index. All three variables could predict opening of the eyes in response to verbal commands or a glabellar tap, the aepEX being a better predictor than the bispectral index or SEF95%. All three EEG variables had Pk values >0.5 in predicting coughing or movement in response to tracheal suction, but they were unable to predict increases in heart rate or systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The aepEX was the best predictor, followed by bispectral index. Although in most intensive care patients subjective sedation scales are sufficient to assess levels of sedation, the aepEX and bispectral index were potential alternatives to subjective scales when they do not work well in the setting of neuromuscular blockade or may not be sufficiently sensitive to evaluate very deep sedation.

摘要

目的

比较听觉诱发电位衍生物aepEX、脑电双频指数和SEF95%预测对各种刺激反应的能力。

设计

前瞻性临床研究。

地点

一所大学医院的综合重症监护病房。

患者和参与者

40例术后机械通气患者。

干预措施

血液中丙泊酚的目标浓度随机设定为0.5微克/毫升、1.0微克/毫升、1.5微克/毫升和2.0微克/毫升,芬太尼输注速率固定在0.5微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹至1.5微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹之间。

测量指标

使用Ramsay镇静评分主观评估镇静深度。使用听觉诱发电位系统记录aepEX。使用Aspect A - 1000监护仪测量脑电双频指数和SEF95%。

结果

aepEX、脑电双频指数和SEF95%与Ramsay镇静评分相关,aepEX的Pk值最大,其次是脑电双频指数。所有这三个变量都可以预测对言语指令或眉间轻叩的睁眼反应,aepEX比脑电双频指数或SEF95%是更好的预测指标。所有这三个脑电图变量在预测气管吸引引起的咳嗽或运动时的Pk值>0.5,但它们无法预测心率或收缩压的升高。

结论

aepEX是最佳预测指标,其次是脑电双频指数。虽然在大多数重症监护患者中,主观镇静量表足以评估镇静水平,但当主观量表在神经肌肉阻滞情况下效果不佳或对评估极深镇静不够敏感时,aepEX和脑电双频指数是主观量表的潜在替代指标。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验