• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

镇静期间对各种刺激反应的预测:三种脑电图变量的比较

Prediction of responses to various stimuli during sedation: a comparison of three EEG variables.

作者信息

Doi Matsuyuki, Morita Koji, Mantzaridis Haralambos, Sato Shigehito, Kenny Gavin N C

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Hamamatsu University School of Medicine, 1-20-1 Handayama, Hamamatsu 431-3192, Japan.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jan;31(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2516-x. Epub 2004 Dec 1.

DOI:10.1007/s00134-004-2516-x
PMID:15650862
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ability of the aepEX, a derivative of auditory evoked potentials, the bispectral index, and SEF95% to predict responses to various stimuli.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical study.

SETTING

General Intensive Care Unit in a university hospital.

PATIENTS AND PARTICIPANTS

Forty postsurgical, mechanically ventilated patients.

INTERVENTIONS

Target concentrations of blood propofol were randomly set at 0.5 microg/ml, 1.0 microg/ml, 1.5 microg/ml, and 2.0 microg/ml, with a fixed fentanyl infusion rate between 0.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1) and 1.5 microg.kg(-1).h(-1).

MEASUREMENTS

Depth of sedation was subjectively assessed with the Ramsay Sedation Score. The aepEX was recorded using an auditory evoked potentials system. The bispectral index and SEF95% were measured using an Aspect A-1000 monitor.

RESULTS

The aepEX, bispectral index, and SEF95% correlated with the Ramsay Sedation Score, the Pk value being greatest for the aepEX, followed by the bispectral index. All three variables could predict opening of the eyes in response to verbal commands or a glabellar tap, the aepEX being a better predictor than the bispectral index or SEF95%. All three EEG variables had Pk values >0.5 in predicting coughing or movement in response to tracheal suction, but they were unable to predict increases in heart rate or systolic blood pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

The aepEX was the best predictor, followed by bispectral index. Although in most intensive care patients subjective sedation scales are sufficient to assess levels of sedation, the aepEX and bispectral index were potential alternatives to subjective scales when they do not work well in the setting of neuromuscular blockade or may not be sufficiently sensitive to evaluate very deep sedation.

摘要

目的

比较听觉诱发电位衍生物aepEX、脑电双频指数和SEF95%预测对各种刺激反应的能力。

设计

前瞻性临床研究。

地点

一所大学医院的综合重症监护病房。

患者和参与者

40例术后机械通气患者。

干预措施

血液中丙泊酚的目标浓度随机设定为0.5微克/毫升、1.0微克/毫升、1.5微克/毫升和2.0微克/毫升,芬太尼输注速率固定在0.5微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹至1.5微克·千克⁻¹·小时⁻¹之间。

测量指标

使用Ramsay镇静评分主观评估镇静深度。使用听觉诱发电位系统记录aepEX。使用Aspect A - 1000监护仪测量脑电双频指数和SEF95%。

结果

aepEX、脑电双频指数和SEF95%与Ramsay镇静评分相关,aepEX的Pk值最大,其次是脑电双频指数。所有这三个变量都可以预测对言语指令或眉间轻叩的睁眼反应,aepEX比脑电双频指数或SEF95%是更好的预测指标。所有这三个脑电图变量在预测气管吸引引起的咳嗽或运动时的Pk值>0.5,但它们无法预测心率或收缩压的升高。

结论

aepEX是最佳预测指标,其次是脑电双频指数。虽然在大多数重症监护患者中,主观镇静量表足以评估镇静水平,但当主观量表在神经肌肉阻滞情况下效果不佳或对评估极深镇静不够敏感时,aepEX和脑电双频指数是主观量表的潜在替代指标。

相似文献

1
Prediction of responses to various stimuli during sedation: a comparison of three EEG variables.镇静期间对各种刺激反应的预测:三种脑电图变量的比较
Intensive Care Med. 2005 Jan;31(1):41-7. doi: 10.1007/s00134-004-2516-x. Epub 2004 Dec 1.
2
Comparison of a new composite index based on midlatency auditory evoked potentials and electroencephalographic parameters with bispectral index (BIS) during moderate propofol sedation.在丙泊酚中度镇静期间,基于中潜伏期听觉诱发电位和脑电图参数的新型复合指数与脑电双频指数(BIS)的比较。
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Nov;23(11):931-6. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506001050. Epub 2006 Jul 7.
3
Relative reliability of the auditory evoked potential and Bispectral Index for monitoring sedation level in surgical intensive care patients.听觉诱发电位与脑电双频指数监测外科重症监护患者镇静水平的相对可靠性
Anaesth Intensive Care. 2008 Jul;36(4):553-9. doi: 10.1177/0310057X0803600409.
4
Comparison of the two different auditory evoked potentials index monitors in propofol-fentanyl-nitrous oxide anesthesia.比较丙泊酚-芬太尼-氧化亚氮麻醉中两种不同听觉诱发电位指数监测仪。
J Clin Anesth. 2009 Dec;21(8):551-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2008.12.024.
5
Evaluation of the aepEX™ monitor of hypnotic depth in pediatric patients receiving propofol-remifentanil anesthesia.在接受丙泊酚-瑞芬太尼麻醉的儿科患者中评估aepEX™催眠深度监测仪。
Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Oct;23(10):891-7. doi: 10.1111/pan.12235. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
6
Monitoring sedation in critically ill patients: bispectral index, Ramsay and observer scales.危重症患者的镇静监测:脑电双频指数、拉姆齐评分及观察者评分量表
Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2006 Aug;23(8):649-53. doi: 10.1017/S0265021506000056. Epub 2006 Jan 27.
7
Changes in the auditory evoked potentials and the bispectral index following propofol or propofol and alfentanil.丙泊酚或丙泊酚与阿芬太尼合用后听觉诱发电位和脑电双频指数的变化。
Anesthesiology. 2000 May;92(5):1300-10. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200005000-00018.
8
Bispectral index variations during tracheal suction in mechanically ventilated critically ill patients: effect of an alfentanil bolus.
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Feb;28(2):211-3. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1189-y. Epub 2002 Jan 12.
9
Assessment of the level of sedation in children after cardiac surgery.心脏手术后儿童镇静水平的评估。
Ann Thorac Surg. 2009 Jul;88(1):144-50. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2009.03.074.
10
Assessment of recovery in patients undergoing intravenous conscious sedation using bispectral analysis.使用双谱分析评估接受静脉清醒镇静患者的恢复情况。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2001 Jun;59(6):603-11; discussion 611-2. doi: 10.1053/joms.2001.23366.

引用本文的文献

1
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the correlation between bispectral index (BIS) and clinical sedation scales: Toward defining the role of BIS in critically ill patients.系统评价和 bispectral index(BIS)与临床镇静评分相关性的荟萃分析:旨在确定 BIS 在危重症患者中的作用。
Pharmacotherapy. 2022 Aug;42(8):667-676. doi: 10.1002/phar.2712. Epub 2022 Jun 30.
2
The Use of Middle Latency Auditory Evoked Potentials (MLAEP) as Methodology for Evaluating Sedation Level in Propofol-Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) Procedure.应用中潜伏期听觉诱发电位(MLAEP)作为评估异丙酚药物诱导睡眠内镜检查(DISE)镇静水平的方法。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 20;18(4):2070. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18042070.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Bispectral Index in ICU: correlation with Ramsay Score on assessment of sedation level.
J Clin Monit Comput. 2002 Jul;17(5):271-7. doi: 10.1023/a:1021250320103.
2
How reliable is the Bispectral Index in critically ill patients? A prospective, comparative, single-blinded observer study.脑电双频指数在危重症患者中的可靠性如何?一项前瞻性、对比性、单盲观察者研究。
Crit Care Med. 2002 Jul;30(7):1483-7. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200207000-00014.
3
Is the bispectral index appropriate for monitoring the sedation level of mechanically ventilated surgical ICU patients?脑电双频指数是否适用于监测外科重症监护病房机械通气患者的镇静水平?
Urine Neutrophil Gelatinase-associated Lipocalin (NGAL) for Prediction of Persistent AKI and Major Adverse Kidney Events.
尿液中性粒细胞明胶酶相关脂质运载蛋白(NGAL)预测持续性 AKI 和主要不良肾脏事件。
Sci Rep. 2020 May 26;10(1):8718. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-65764-w.
4
Middle latency auditory-evoked potential index monitoring of cerebral function to predict functional outcome after emergency craniotomy in patients with brain damage.脑损伤患者急诊开颅术后脑功能的中潜伏期听觉诱发电位指数监测以预测功能转归
Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2015 Oct 20;23:80. doi: 10.1186/s13049-015-0161-8.
5
Monitoring sedation for bronchoscopy in mechanically ventilated patients by using the Ramsay sedation scale versus auditory-evoked potentials.使用 Ramsay 镇静评分与听觉诱发电位监测机械通气患者支气管镜检查时的镇静状态。
BMC Pulm Med. 2014 Feb 6;14:15. doi: 10.1186/1471-2466-14-15.
6
Assessing sedation in critically ill children by bispectral index, auditory-evoked potentials and clinical scales.通过脑电双频指数、听觉诱发电位和临床量表评估危重症儿童的镇静状态。
Intensive Care Med. 2008 Nov;34(11):2092-9. doi: 10.1007/s00134-008-1198-1. Epub 2008 Jul 4.
7
[Measurement of the depth of anaesthesia].[麻醉深度的测量]
Anaesthesist. 2008 Jan;57(1):9-30, 32-6. doi: 10.1007/s00101-007-1294-6.
8
Sedation and analgesia in German intensive care units: how is it done in reality? Results of a patient-based survey of analgesia and sedation.德国重症监护病房的镇静与镇痛:实际操作情况如何?一项基于患者的镇痛与镇静调查结果
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Aug;32(8):1137-42. doi: 10.1007/s00134-006-0214-6. Epub 2006 Jun 2.
9
Year in review in intensive care medicine, 2005. II. Infection and sepsis, ventilator-associated pneumonia, ethics, haematology and haemostasis, ICU organisation and scoring, brain injury.2005年重症医学年度回顾。二、感染与脓毒症、呼吸机相关性肺炎、伦理学、血液学与止血、重症监护病房组织与评分、脑损伤。
Intensive Care Med. 2006 Mar;32(3):380-90. doi: 10.1007/s00134-005-0060-y. Epub 2006 Feb 17.
Intensive Care Med. 2002 Feb;28(2):178-83. doi: 10.1007/s00134-001-1183-4. Epub 2002 Jan 12.
4
Effects of the auditory stimuli of an auditory evoked potential system on levels of consciousness, and on the bispectral index.听觉诱发电位系统的听觉刺激对意识水平和脑电双频指数的影响。
Br J Anaesth. 2001 Nov;87(5):778-80. doi: 10.1093/bja/87.5.778.
5
Auditory evoked potential index predicts the depth of sedation and movement in response to skin incision during sevoflurane anesthesia.听觉诱发电位指数可预测七氟醚麻醉期间对皮肤切开的镇静深度和反应性运动。
Anesthesiology. 2001 Aug;95(2):364-70. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200108000-00017.
6
Validating the Sedation-Agitation Scale with the Bispectral Index and Visual Analog Scale in adult ICU patients after cardiac surgery.在心脏手术后的成年重症监护病房患者中,用脑电双频指数和视觉模拟评分法验证镇静-躁动评分量表
Intensive Care Med. 2001 May;27(5):853-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340100912.
7
Evaluation of two processed EEG analyzers for assessment of sedation after coronary artery bypass grafting.评估两种经处理的脑电图分析仪在冠状动脉搭桥术后镇静评估中的应用。
Intensive Care Med. 2001 Jan;27(1):107-14. doi: 10.1007/s001340000761.
8
Cortical arousal in critically ill patients: an evoked response study.危重症患者的皮质觉醒:一项诱发电位研究。
Intensive Care Med. 2000 Sep;26(9):1312-8. doi: 10.1007/s001340000591.
9
Assessing sedation during intensive care unit mechanical ventilation with the Bispectral Index and the Sedation-Agitation Scale.使用脑电双频指数和镇静-躁动评分评估重症监护病房机械通气期间的镇静情况。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Aug;27(8):1499-504. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199908000-00016.
10
Prospective evaluation of the Sedation-Agitation Scale for adult critically ill patients.成人重症患者镇静-躁动量表的前瞻性评估。
Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;27(7):1325-9. doi: 10.1097/00003246-199907000-00022.