Saliangas K
Department of Surgery, General Hospital of Edessa, Markou Botsari 114, GR-59100 Veria, Greece.
Tech Coloproctol. 2004 Nov;8 Suppl 1:s10-3. doi: 10.1007/s10151-004-0098-9.
A review of the literature regarding the screening strategies for colorectal cancer (CRC), particularly for average risk individuals, is analysed. The advantages and disadvantages or limitations of screening modalities for CRC, such as faecal occult blood testing (FOBT) with guaiac-based tests or the new faecal deoxyribonucleic acid tests, endoscopic screening by flexible sigmoidoscopy, colonoscopy, or CT-colonography and double contrast barium enema examination, are reported. The efficacy and cost of the screening tests are evaluated, and it is found that any of the suggested tests is more cost effective than other medical intervention or treatment as compared with no screening. The reported compliance to any form of screening test was 30-40%, a rate that is low enough. The experience of our surgical department of a screening programme, based on FOBT, on 4189 individuals over 50 years old, and application of colonoscopy in positive subjects, is reported.
本文分析了关于结直肠癌(CRC)筛查策略的文献综述,特别是针对平均风险个体的筛查策略。报告了CRC筛查方式的优缺点或局限性,如基于愈创木脂试验的粪便潜血试验(FOBT)或新的粪便脱氧核糖核酸检测、通过乙状结肠镜检查、结肠镜检查、CT结肠成像或双对比钡灌肠检查进行的内镜筛查。评估了筛查试验的有效性和成本,发现与不进行筛查相比,任何一种建议的试验都比其他医疗干预或治疗更具成本效益。报告的任何形式筛查试验的依从率为30%-40%,这一比率足够低。报告了我们外科基于FOBT对4189名50岁以上个体进行筛查计划以及对阳性受试者应用结肠镜检查的经验。