Wennerstrand J, Johnston C, Roethlisberger-Holm K, Erichsen C, Eksell P, Drevemo S
Department of Anatomy and Physiology, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, SE-750 07 Uppsala, Sweden.
Equine Vet J. 2004 Dec;36(8):707-11. doi: 10.2746/0425164044848226.
Earlier studies have developed a clinical tool to evaluate objectively the function of the equine back. The ability to differentiate horses with back pain from asymptomatic, fully functioning horses using kinematic measures from this tool has not been evaluated.
To compare the kinematics of the back at walk and trot in riding horses with back dysfunction to the same parameters in asymptomatic sport horses.
The kinematics of the back in 12 horses with impaired performance and back pain were studied at walk and trot on a treadmill. Data were captured for 10 sees at 240 Hz. Range of movement (ROM) and intravertebral pattern symmetry of movement for flexion and extension (FE), lateral bending (LB) and axial rotation (AR) were derived from angular motion pattern data and the results compared to an earlier established database on asymptomatic riding horses.
At walk, horses with back dysfunction had a ROM smaller for dorsoventral FE in the caudal thoracic region (T13 = 7.50 degrees, T17 = 7.71 degrees; P<0.05), greater for LB at T13 (8.13 degrees; P<0.001) and smaller for AR of the pelvis (10.97 degrees; P<0.05) compared to asymptomatic horses (FE-T13 = 8.28 degrees, FE-T17 = 8.49 degrees, LB-T13 = 6.34 degrees, AR-pelvis = 12.77 degrees). At trot, dysfunctional horses had a smaller (P<0.05) ROM for FE at the thoracic lumbar junction (T17 = 2.46 degrees, L1 = 2.60 degrees) compared to asymptomatic horses (FE-T17 = 3.07 degrees, FE-L1 = 3.12 degrees).
The objective measurement technique can detect differences between back kinematics in riding horses with signs of back dysfunction and asymptomatic horses. The clinical manifestation of back pain results in diminished flexion/extension movement at or near the thoracic lumbar junction. However, before applying the method more extensively in practice it is necessary to evaluate it further, including measurements of patients whose diagnoses can be confirmed and long-term follow-ups of back patients after treatment.
Since the objective measurement technique can detect small movement differences in back kinematics, it should help to clinically describe and, importantly, objectively detect horses with back pain and dysfunction.
早期研究开发了一种临床工具,用于客观评估马背部的功能。但尚未评估利用该工具的运动学测量方法区分背部疼痛的马与无症状、功能正常的马的能力。
比较有背部功能障碍的骑乘马在行走和小跑时背部的运动学情况与无症状运动马的相同参数。
对12匹表现不佳且有背部疼痛的马在跑步机上行走和小跑时的背部运动学进行研究。以240Hz的频率采集10秒的数据。从角运动模式数据中得出屈伸(FE)、侧弯(LB)和轴向旋转(AR)的运动范围(ROM)和椎骨间运动模式对称性,并将结果与早期建立的无症状骑乘马数据库进行比较。
在行走时,与无症状马(FE-T13 = 8.28度,FE-T17 = 8.49度,LB-T13 = 6.34度,AR-骨盆 = 12.77度)相比,有背部功能障碍的马在胸段尾部区域(T13 = 7.50度,T17 = 7.71度;P<0.05)的背腹向FE的ROM较小,在T13处的LB较大(8.13度;P<0.001),骨盆的AR较小(10.97度;P<0.05)。在小跑时,与无症状马(FE-T17 = 3.07度,FE-L1 = 3.12度)相比,功能障碍马在胸腰交界处(T17 = 2.46度,L1 = 2.60度)的FE的ROM较小(P<0.05)。
客观测量技术可以检测出有背部功能障碍迹象的骑乘马与无症状马在背部运动学上的差异。背痛的临床表现导致胸腰交界处或其附近的屈伸运动减少。然而,在更广泛地将该方法应用于实践之前,有必要进一步评估,包括对诊断可确诊的患者进行测量以及对背部疾病患者治疗后的长期随访。
由于客观测量技术可以检测出背部运动学上的微小运动差异,它应有助于在临床上描述并重要的是客观检测出有背痛和功能障碍的马。