Clinton Michael, Murrells Trevor, Robinson Sarah
The Management Centre, King's College London, London SE1 9NN, UK.
J Clin Nurs. 2005 Jan;14(1):82-94. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2004.01015.x.
The present study aimed to investigate the competencies of qualifiers from three-year degree and three-year diploma courses in England at one, two and three years after qualification.
The provision of three-year preregistration nursing degrees in the UK has increased in recent years and in many colleges degrees are offered alongside the existing three-year diploma courses. Yet little is known about the relationship between these different education programmes and the competence of qualifiers.
A cross-sectional survey design was employed to make comparisons of both self-reported and line-manager-rated competencies of graduate and diplomate nurses who had qualified up to three years previously.
A revised version of the Nursing Competencies Questionnaire was used to measure both overall competence and also eight specific nursing competencies. A shortened version of this scale was also used to assess internal consistency across measures. Two additional competencies, research awareness and policy awareness, were also measured.
Structural equation modelling found very little difference in the overall competence and specific competencies of graduates and diplomates. Where differences were found in the self-report data, diplomates scored more highly than graduates in the constructs of planning and social participation; however, these differences became non-significant when background variables were controlled for.
The findings are interpreted with caution due to the size of differences, the size of some of the samples of respondents and the developmental stage of the instrument used.
It does not appear that graduates and diplomates in England differ in their level of competence to any great extent as measured by the Nursing Competencies Questionnaire. Areas of further work are discussed in the light of the findings.
While this may alleviate concerns about clinical disparities between the two groups, it raises questions about the proposed benefits to nursing of three-year preregistration degrees in terms of quality of care during the first three years of qualification.
本研究旨在调查英格兰三年制学位课程和三年制文凭课程的毕业生在毕业后1年、2年和3年时的能力水平。
近年来,英国三年制预注册护理学位的提供有所增加,在许多学院中,学位课程与现有的三年制文凭课程同时开设。然而,对于这些不同教育项目与毕业生能力之间的关系,我们所知甚少。
采用横断面调查设计,对毕业时间不超过三年的本科护士和文凭护士的自我报告能力和直属上级评定能力进行比较。
使用修订版的《护理能力问卷》来衡量总体能力以及八项特定的护理能力。该量表的简化版也用于评估各项测量指标的内部一致性。另外还测量了两项能力,即研究意识和政策意识。
结构方程模型显示,本科护士和文凭护士在总体能力和特定能力方面差异极小。在自我报告数据中发现差异的地方,文凭护士在计划和社会参与这两个方面的得分高于本科护士;然而,在控制背景变量后,这些差异变得不显著。
由于差异的大小、部分受访者样本的规模以及所用工具的发展阶段,对研究结果的解读需谨慎。
根据《护理能力问卷》的测量结果,英格兰的本科护士和文凭护士在能力水平上似乎没有很大差异。根据研究结果讨论了进一步的工作领域。
虽然这可能减轻对两组临床差异的担忧,但这也引发了关于三年制预注册学位对护理在资格认证头三年护理质量方面所宣称益处的质疑。