Pelletier C
Can J Surg. 1979 Jul;22(4):347-50.
The accuracy of thermodilution for measuring cardiac output was studied by comparing this method with measurements obtained by an electromagnetic flowmeter in the dog. Thermal curves were computed by a cardiac output computer and absolute flows were obtained by pump calibration of the flowmeter. Regression analysis showed an excellent correlation (P less than 0.001) between thermodilution measurements with injectates at 0 degrees C and flowmeter measurements using either cannulating probes (n = 105, r = 0.98) or periaortic probes (n = 100, r = 0.96). With the use of normal room temperature injectates, a good correlation was also found with absolute flows (n = 75, r = 0.92, P less than 0.001). Thermodilution overestimated cardiac output by 3% to 9%. In 32 pairs of successive cardiac output determinations by thermodilution, there was no significant difference between the two measurements (P greater than 0.05). In eight patients cardiac output was measured postoperatively by thermodilution with injectates at 0 degrees C and 24 degrees C administered in rapid succession. Regression analysis of 50 pairs of measurements at the two temperatures showed a strong correlation between the two techniques (r = 0.96) and the two results were not significantly different (P = 0.00001).
通过将热稀释法与电磁流量计在犬身上测得的结果相比较,研究了热稀释法测量心输出量的准确性。热曲线由心输出量计算机计算得出,绝对流量通过流量计的泵校准获得。回归分析表明,在使用0℃注射剂的热稀释测量值与使用插管探头(n = 105,r = 0.98)或主动脉周围探头(n = 100,r = 0.96)的流量计测量值之间存在极佳的相关性(P小于0.001)。使用常温注射剂时,与绝对流量也发现有良好的相关性(n = 75,r = 0.92,P小于0.001)。热稀释法高估心输出量3%至9%。在通过热稀释法进行的32对连续心输出量测定中,两次测量之间无显著差异(P大于0.05)。在8例患者中,术后通过热稀释法快速连续给予0℃和24℃的注射剂来测量心输出量。对两个温度下的50对测量值进行回归分析表明,两种技术之间有很强的相关性(r = 0.96),且两个结果无显著差异(P = 0.00001)。