Ferrario Marco, Chiodini Paolo, Chambless Lloyd E, Cesana Giancarlo, Vanuzzo Diego, Panico Salvatore, Sega Roberto, Pilotto Lorenza, Palmieri Luigi, Giampaoli Simona
Dipartimento di Scienze Cliniche e Biologiche, Università degli studi dell'Insubria, Varese 21100, Italy.
Int J Epidemiol. 2005 Apr;34(2):413-21. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyh405. Epub 2005 Jan 19.
The aims of this paper are to derive a 10-year coronary risk predictive equation for adult Italian men, and to assess its accuracy in comparison with the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) and PROCAM study equations.
The CUORE study is a prospective fixed-cohort study. Eleven cohorts, from the north and the centre-south of Italy, had been investigated at baseline between 1982 and 1996, adopting MONICA methods to measure risk factors. Among this sample of 6865 men, aged 35-69 years and free of coronary heart disease (CHD) at baseline, 312 first fatal and non-fatal major coronary events occurred in 9.1 years median follow-up. Calibration, as the difference between 10-year predicted and actual risk, and discrimination, as the ability of the risk functions to separate high-risk from low-risk subjects, have been assessed to compare accuracy of the FHS, the PROCAM, and the CUORE study equations.
The best CUORE equation includes age, total cholesterol, systolic blood pressure, cigarette smoking, HDL-cholesterol, diabetes mellitus, hypertension drug treatment, and family history of CHD (area under the ROC curve = 0.75). The uncalibrated estimates of the 10-year risk in this CUORE follow-up data were 0.093 and 0.109 higher (P < 0.05) from the Framingham and PROCAM risk scores, respectively, than the Kaplan-Meier estimate for CUORE, indicating risk overestimates for both equations. Standard recalibration techniques improved accuracy of the FHS equation only. PROCAM overestimates were prominent in the higher risk deciles. With an alternative method for recalibration better risk estimates were obtained, but a cohort study was needed to obtain a properly calibrated risk equation.
The CUORE Project predictive equation showed better accuracy of the FHS and PROCAM equations, overcoming frequently reported risk overestimates. The CUORE equation may be adopted to identify men with high coronary risk in Italy.
本文旨在推导一个适用于成年意大利男性的10年冠心病风险预测方程,并与弗雷明汉心脏研究(FHS)和PROCAM研究方程相比,评估其准确性。
CUORE研究是一项前瞻性固定队列研究。1982年至1996年间,采用莫尼卡方法测量危险因素,对来自意大利北部和中南部的11个队列进行了基线调查。在这个由6865名年龄在35 - 69岁且基线时无冠心病(CHD)的男性组成的样本中,在中位随访9.1年期间发生了312例首次致命和非致命的主要冠心病事件。已评估校准(即10年预测风险与实际风险之间的差异)和区分度(即风险函数将高危人群与低危人群区分开的能力),以比较FHS、PROCAM和CUORE研究方程的准确性。
最佳的CUORE方程包括年龄、总胆固醇、收缩压、吸烟、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇、糖尿病、高血压药物治疗以及冠心病家族史(ROC曲线下面积 = 0.75)。在该CUORE随访数据中,10年风险的未校准估计值分别比弗雷明汉和PROCAM风险评分高出0.093和0.109(P < 0.05),高于CUORE的Kaplan-Meier估计值,表明这两个方程都高估了风险。标准重新校准技术仅提高了FHS方程的准确性。PROCAM的高估在较高风险十分位数中较为突出。采用另一种重新校准方法获得了更好的风险估计,但需要进行队列研究以获得经过适当校准的风险方程。
CUORE项目预测方程显示出比FHS和PROCAM方程更高的准确性,克服了经常报道的风险高估问题。CUORE方程可用于识别意大利冠心病高危男性。