Nweke M, Oyirinnaya P, Nwoha P, Mitha S B, Mshunqane N, Govender N, Ukwuoma M, Ibeneme S C
Department of Physiotherapy, David Umahi Federal University of Health Sciences, Uburu, Ebonyi State, Nigeria.
Department of Physiotherapy, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.
BMC Neurol. 2025 Jul 7;25(1):282. doi: 10.1186/s12883-025-04229-x.
Predicting stroke risk is critical for preventive interventions. Most validated prediction models do not include data from African populations and may not be appropriate for the region. Relying solely on statistical significance to identify predictors may compromise algorithm performance. Also, some of the existing models include expensive biomarkers that are unsuitable for resource-limited settings. This study aims to develop a cost-effective and inclusive Afrocentric predictive model for stroke (CAPMS).
We conducted a meta-analysis following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses protocol and searched the PubMed, Scopus, African Journal, Medline, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Cumulative Index for Nursing and Allied Health Literature databases. We included case‒control and cohort studies reporting stroke risk factors and their estimates among African populations. Titles and abstracts were independently screened. Meta-analyses were performed using Comprehensive Meta-analysis version 3.
More than 50% of the eligible studies examined both ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke. More than 20 stroke risk factors were identified in Africa, with 18 eligible for meta-analysis. Homocysteine (risk weight [Rw] = 13.9, risk stability index [Ri] = 0.67), hypertension (Rw = 5.6, Ri = 0.94), and cardiac events (Rw = 3.1, Ri = 0.8) were the strongest independent predictors. Low green vegetable consumption (Rw = 2.4, Ri = 1.0), stress (Rw = 1.76, Ri = 1.0), and hypertension were the most clinically responsive risk factors. All risk factors/biomarkers except homocysteine cost between $2.8 and 12.2, indicating cost-effectiveness. A critical risk point of 12.7 was set at the 90th percentile. The cumulative Rw and costs for CAPMS 1 (20 and $1.2-4.6) and CAPMS 2 (22.4 and $6.5-17.3) indicate high performance and cost-effectiveness.
Targeted screening via the CAPMS 1 and CAPMS 2 models offers a cost-effective solution for stroke screening in African clinics and communities. Immediate validation of the CAPMS is needed to evaluate its performance, feasibility, and acceptability in the region.
The study protocol is registered with PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023430437).
预测中风风险对于预防干预至关重要。大多数经过验证的预测模型未纳入非洲人群的数据,可能不适用于该地区。仅依靠统计学意义来识别预测因素可能会影响算法性能。此外,一些现有模型包含昂贵的生物标志物,不适用于资源有限的环境。本研究旨在开发一种具有成本效益且包容非洲人群的中风预测模型(CAPMS)。
我们按照系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目协议进行了一项Meta分析,并检索了PubMed、Scopus、非洲期刊、Medline、Cochrane图书馆、科学网以及护理与联合健康文献累积索引数据库。我们纳入了报告非洲人群中风危险因素及其估计值的病例对照研究和队列研究。对标题和摘要进行独立筛选。使用综合Meta分析第3版进行Meta分析。
超过50%的符合条件的研究同时考察了缺血性和出血性中风。在非洲确定了20多种中风危险因素,其中18种符合Meta分析条件。同型半胱氨酸(风险权重[Rw]=13.9,风险稳定性指数[Ri]=0.67)、高血压(Rw=5.6,Ri=0.94)和心脏事件(Rw=3.1,Ri=0.8)是最强的独立预测因素。绿色蔬菜摄入量低(Rw=2.4,Ri=1.0)、压力(Rw=1.76,Ri=1.0)和高血压是临床上最具反应性的危险因素。除同型半胱氨酸外,所有危险因素/生物标志物的成本在2.8美元至12.2美元之间,表明具有成本效益。在第90百分位数处设定了12.7的临界风险点。CAPMS 1(20和1.2 - 4.6美元)和CAPMS 2(22.4和6.5 - 17.3美元)的累积Rw和成本表明其具有高性能和成本效益。
通过CAPMS 1和CAPMS 2模型进行有针对性的筛查为非洲诊所和社区的中风筛查提供了一种具有成本效益的解决方案。需要对CAPMS进行即时验证,以评估其在该地区的性能、可行性和可接受性。
该研究方案已在PROSPERO注册(标识符:CRD42023430437)。