Glazko Galina V, Koonin Eugene V, Rogozin Igor B
Stowers Institute for Medical Research, 1000 E. 50th Street, Kansas City, MO 64110, USA.
Trends Genet. 2005 Feb;21(2):89-92. doi: 10.1016/j.tig.2004.12.006.
Molecular time estimates, especially those that employed the 310 million years ago (Mya) date of mammal-bird divergence as the calibration point, were criticized in recent publications. In this article, we estimate the divergence time of primates and rodents, primates and artiodactyls and the different great ape species by using two independent calibration-time ranges and maximally conservative error estimates. We observed a variation of approximately +/-15-20% for most of the molecular time estimates in the 10-100 Mya range. The estimated range of the primate-rodent divergence time, 84-121 Mya, includes the date obtained with the 310 million years calibration point (110 Mya). We conclude that molecular time estimates remain useful tools of evolutionary biology, although utmost caution is required when interpreting the results.
分子时间估计,尤其是那些将3.1亿年前(百万年前,Mya)哺乳动物与鸟类分歧的时间作为校准点的估计,在最近的出版物中受到了批评。在本文中,我们通过使用两个独立的校准时间范围和最大程度保守的误差估计,来估计灵长类动物与啮齿动物、灵长类动物与偶蹄动物以及不同类人猿物种之间的分歧时间。我们观察到,在10 - 100百万年前范围内的大多数分子时间估计值存在约±15 - 20%的变化。灵长类动物与啮齿动物分歧时间的估计范围为84 - 121百万年前,其中包括使用3.1亿年校准点(110百万年前)获得的日期。我们得出结论,分子时间估计仍然是进化生物学的有用工具,尽管在解释结果时需要极其谨慎。