Plescia Marcus, Joyner Dennis R, Scheid Teresa L
Carolinas Community Health Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System and North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, NC 27699-1915, USA.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A16. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
Regional health care systems have significant opportunities to adopt community-oriented approaches that impact the incidence and burden of chronic disease. In 1998, a vertically integrated, regional health care system established a community health institute to identify, understand, and respond to health needs from a community perspective. The project was implemented in four communities (two rural counties, a rural/urban transitional county, and an inner-city community) using five steps: 1) support or form a local community coalition; 2) hire and support a local coordinator; 3) prepare a formal community assessment; 4) fund locally designed interventions; and 5) evaluate each project. In four narrative case studies, we present the steps, challenges, and common principles faced at the local level by Carolinas Community Health Institute. The case studies were prepared using three data sources: reviews of written documents, interviews with the seven-member steering committee, and interviews with six key informants from each county. Data were coded and analyzed using standard qualitative software to identify common themes and sources of variance between cases. The project model was generally well accepted. Local autonomy and domain disputes were challenges in all four sites. Funding for local projects was the most frequently cited benefit. The project was successful in increasing local capacity and supporting well-designed interventions to prevent chronic disease. This approach can be used by large health care systems and by other organizations to better support local health initiatives.
区域医疗保健系统有重大机会采用以社区为导向的方法,这些方法会影响慢性病的发病率和负担。1998年,一个垂直整合的区域医疗保健系统设立了一个社区健康研究所,从社区角度识别、理解并回应健康需求。该项目在四个社区(两个农村县、一个城乡过渡县和一个市中心社区)实施,采用了五个步骤:1)支持或组建当地社区联盟;2)雇佣并支持一名当地协调员;3)准备一份正式的社区评估;4)为当地设计的干预措施提供资金;5)评估每个项目。在四个叙述性案例研究中,我们展示了卡罗莱纳社区健康研究所在地方层面面临的步骤、挑战和共同原则。案例研究使用了三个数据源:书面文件审查、对七人指导委员会的访谈以及对每个县六名关键信息提供者的访谈。使用标准定性软件对数据进行编码和分析,以识别案例之间的共同主题和差异来源。该项目模式总体上得到了广泛认可。地方自主权和领域争端在所有四个地点都是挑战。为当地项目提供资金是最常被提及的益处。该项目成功提高了地方能力,并支持了精心设计的预防慢性病的干预措施。大型医疗保健系统和其他组织可以采用这种方法来更好地支持地方健康倡议。