• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一个与当地社区合作以影响慢性病的区域医疗保健系统。

A regional health care system partnership with local communities to impact chronic disease.

作者信息

Plescia Marcus, Joyner Dennis R, Scheid Teresa L

机构信息

Carolinas Community Health Institute, Carolinas HealthCare System and North Carolina Division of Public Health, Raleigh, NC 27699-1915, USA.

出版信息

Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A16. Epub 2004 Sep 15.

PMID:15670448
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1277956/
Abstract

Regional health care systems have significant opportunities to adopt community-oriented approaches that impact the incidence and burden of chronic disease. In 1998, a vertically integrated, regional health care system established a community health institute to identify, understand, and respond to health needs from a community perspective. The project was implemented in four communities (two rural counties, a rural/urban transitional county, and an inner-city community) using five steps: 1) support or form a local community coalition; 2) hire and support a local coordinator; 3) prepare a formal community assessment; 4) fund locally designed interventions; and 5) evaluate each project. In four narrative case studies, we present the steps, challenges, and common principles faced at the local level by Carolinas Community Health Institute. The case studies were prepared using three data sources: reviews of written documents, interviews with the seven-member steering committee, and interviews with six key informants from each county. Data were coded and analyzed using standard qualitative software to identify common themes and sources of variance between cases. The project model was generally well accepted. Local autonomy and domain disputes were challenges in all four sites. Funding for local projects was the most frequently cited benefit. The project was successful in increasing local capacity and supporting well-designed interventions to prevent chronic disease. This approach can be used by large health care systems and by other organizations to better support local health initiatives.

摘要

区域医疗保健系统有重大机会采用以社区为导向的方法,这些方法会影响慢性病的发病率和负担。1998年,一个垂直整合的区域医疗保健系统设立了一个社区健康研究所,从社区角度识别、理解并回应健康需求。该项目在四个社区(两个农村县、一个城乡过渡县和一个市中心社区)实施,采用了五个步骤:1)支持或组建当地社区联盟;2)雇佣并支持一名当地协调员;3)准备一份正式的社区评估;4)为当地设计的干预措施提供资金;5)评估每个项目。在四个叙述性案例研究中,我们展示了卡罗莱纳社区健康研究所在地方层面面临的步骤、挑战和共同原则。案例研究使用了三个数据源:书面文件审查、对七人指导委员会的访谈以及对每个县六名关键信息提供者的访谈。使用标准定性软件对数据进行编码和分析,以识别案例之间的共同主题和差异来源。该项目模式总体上得到了广泛认可。地方自主权和领域争端在所有四个地点都是挑战。为当地项目提供资金是最常被提及的益处。该项目成功提高了地方能力,并支持了精心设计的预防慢性病的干预措施。大型医疗保健系统和其他组织可以采用这种方法来更好地支持地方健康倡议。

相似文献

1
A regional health care system partnership with local communities to impact chronic disease.一个与当地社区合作以影响慢性病的区域医疗保健系统。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2004 Oct;1(4):A16. Epub 2004 Sep 15.
2
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
3
A Participatory Regional Partnership Approach to Promote Nutrition and Physical Activity Through Environmental and Policy Change in Rural Missouri.一种通过密苏里州农村地区的环境与政策变革促进营养与身体活动的参与式区域伙伴关系方法。
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Jun 11;12:E92. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.140593.
4
The WAMI Rural Hospital Project. Part 6: Overview and conclusions.瓦米农村医院项目。第6部分:概述与结论。
J Rural Health. 1991 Fall;7(5):560-74.
5
Community-based interventions to promote increased physical activity: a primer.基于社区的促进身体活动增加的干预措施:入门指南。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2008;6(4):173-87. doi: 10.1007/BF03256132.
6
The WAMI Rural Hospital Project. Part 1: Historical and theoretical underpinnings.WAMI农村医院项目。第1部分:历史与理论基础。
J Rural Health. 1991 Fall;7(5):473-91.
7
Skill improvement among coalition members in the California Healthy Cities and Communities Program.加利福尼亚健康城市与社区项目中联盟成员的技能提升。
Health Educ Res. 2007 Jun;22(3):450-7. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl109. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
8
The Bridge to Health Project: a collaborative model for assessing the health of a community.健康桥梁项目:一种评估社区健康状况的协作模式。
J Public Health Manag Pract. 1998 May;4(3):43-9. doi: 10.1097/00124784-199805000-00005.
9
Wiisokotaatiwin: development and evaluation of a community-based palliative care program in Naotkamegwanning First Nation.威索科塔蒂温:在瑙特卡梅格万宁第一民族开展的基于社区的姑息治疗项目的开发与评估
Rural Remote Health. 2018 Apr;18(2):4317. doi: 10.22605/RRH4317. Epub 2018 Apr 28.
10
[Integrated sustainability-oriented reporting--key indicators for communities and cities. Results of a research and development project].[面向可持续发展的综合报告——社区和城市的关键指标。一项研发项目的成果]
Gesundheitswesen. 2005 Feb;67(2):150-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2005-857892.

引用本文的文献

1
HealthCARE principles: a model for healthy city collaboratives.医疗保健原则:健康城市合作模式
Prev Chronic Dis. 2007 Apr;4(2):A35. Epub 2007 Mar 15.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluating partnerships for community health improvement: tracking the footprints.评估改善社区健康的伙伴关系:追踪足迹。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 2002 Feb;27(1):49-91. doi: 10.1215/03616878-27-1-49.
2
Rekindling the flame: routine practices that promote hospital community leadership.
J Healthc Manag. 2002 Mar-Apr;47(2):98-109; discussion 109-10.
3
Building partnerships with the community: lessons from the Camden Health Improvement Learning Collaborative.与社区建立伙伴关系:来自卡姆登健康改善学习协作组织的经验教训
J Healthc Manag. 2000 May-Jun;45(3):189-205.
4
Best practices in managing organized delivery systems.管理有组织的分娩系统的最佳实践。
Hosp Health Serv Adm. 1997 Fall;42(3):299-321.
5
A critique of contemporary community health promotion approaches: based on a qualitative review of six programs in Maine.对当代社区健康促进方法的批判:基于对缅因州六个项目的定性综述
Am J Health Promot. 1993 Jan-Feb;7(3):208-20. doi: 10.4278/0890-1171-7.3.208.
6
Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement.确定和界定社区能力的维度,为衡量提供基础。
Health Educ Behav. 1998 Jun;25(3):258-78. doi: 10.1177/109019819802500303.
7
The challenges of governing public-private community health partnerships.公私合营社区卫生伙伴关系的治理挑战。
Health Care Manage Rev. 1998 Spring;23(2):39-55. doi: 10.1097/00004010-199804000-00005.
8
Implementation of the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation's Community Health Promotion Grant Program: a process evaluation.亨利·J·凯泽家庭基金会社区健康促进资助项目的实施:一项过程评估
Milbank Q. 1998;76(1):121-47. doi: 10.1111/1468-0009.00081.
9
Community experiments in action: developing community-defined models for reconfiguring health care delivery.实际开展的社区实验:开发社区定义的医疗服务重新配置模型。
J Health Polit Policy Law. 1997 Aug;22(4):1051-76. doi: 10.1215/03616878-22-4-1051.
10
Community coalitions for prevention and health promotion: factors predicting satisfaction, participation, and planning.预防与健康促进社区联盟:预测满意度、参与度和规划的因素
Health Educ Q. 1996 Feb;23(1):65-79. doi: 10.1177/109019819602300105.