Kegler Michelle C, Norton Barbara L, Aronson Robert
Emory Prevention Research Center, Department of Behavioral Sciences and Health Education, Rollins School of Public Health, Emory University, 1518 Clifton Road NE, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA.
Health Educ Res. 2007 Jun;22(3):450-7. doi: 10.1093/her/cyl109. Epub 2006 Oct 4.
Community-driven, collaborative approaches to health promotion have the potential to enhance skills among community members and, in turn, increase community capacity. This study uses data from an evaluation of the California Healthy Cities and Communities (CHCC) Program to examine whether, and how, community problem-solving and collaboration skills are improved among coalition members and local coordinators in 20 participating communities. Methods include semi-structured interviews with coordinators and mailed surveys with coalition members (n=330 in planning phase and n=243 in implementation phase). The largest number of coordinators reported skill improvement in defining health broadly and assessing needs and assets. Similarly, coalition members reported greatest skill improvement for defining health broadly, assessing needs and assets and setting priorities and developing action plans. Modest correlations were observed between number of roles played in the local healthy cities and communities project and each skill area assessed. Time committed to the local CHCC coalition and its activities was not meaningfully correlated with any of the skills. Types of skill-building opportunities may be more important than number of hours devoted to meetings and activities in strengthening community problem-solving and collaboration skills among coalition members.
由社区推动的健康促进协作方法有潜力提升社区成员的技能,进而增强社区能力。本研究利用对加利福尼亚健康城市与社区(CHCC)项目评估的数据,来检验在20个参与社区中,联盟成员和地方协调员的社区问题解决及协作技能是否以及如何得到了提高。方法包括对协调员进行半结构化访谈以及向联盟成员邮寄调查问卷(规划阶段n = 330,实施阶段n = 243)。最多的协调员报告在广泛定义健康、评估需求和资产方面技能有所提高。同样,联盟成员报告在广泛定义健康、评估需求和资产以及确定优先事项和制定行动计划方面技能提高最大。在所评估的每个技能领域与在地方健康城市与社区项目中所扮演角色的数量之间观察到适度的相关性。投入到地方CHCC联盟及其活动的时间与任何技能均无显著相关性。在加强联盟成员的社区问题解决和协作技能方面,技能建设机会的类型可能比投入到会议和活动的时间更为重要。