Suppr超能文献

人工破膜引产

Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.

作者信息

Boulvain M, Stan C, Irion O

机构信息

Unité de Développement en Obstétrique, Maternité Hôpitaux Universitaires de Genève, Département de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrique, Boulevard de la Cluse, 32, Geneva 14, Switzerland, CH-1211.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub2.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Sweeping of the membranes, also named stripping of the membranes, is a relatively simple technique usually performed without admission to hospital. During vaginal examination, the clinician's finger is introduced into the cervical os. Then, the inferior pole of the membranes is detached from the lower uterine segment by a circular movement of the examining finger. This intervention has the potential to initiate labour by increasing local production of prostaglandins and, thus, reduce pregnancy duration or pre-empt formal induction of labour with either oxytocin, prostaglandins or amniotomy. This is one of a series of reviews of methods of cervical ripening and labour induction using standardised methodology.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of membrane sweeping for third trimester induction of labour.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register (6 July 2004) and bibliographies of relevant papers.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Clinical trials comparing membrane sweeping used for third trimester cervical ripening or labour induction with placebo/no treatment or other methods listed above it on a predefined list of labour induction methods.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A strategy was developed to deal with the large volume and complexity of trial data relating to labour induction. This involved a two-stage method of data extraction.

MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-two trials (2797 women) were included, 20 comparing sweeping of membranes with no treatment, three comparing sweeping with prostaglandins and one comparing sweeping with oxytocin (two studies reported more than one comparison). Risk of caesarean section was similar between groups (relative risk (RR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.70 to 1.15). Sweeping of the membranes, performed as a general policy in women at term, was associated with reduced duration of pregnancy and reduced frequency of pregnancy continuing beyond 41 weeks (RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.46 to 0.74) and 42 weeks (RR 0.28, 95% CI 0.15 to 0.50). To avoid one formal induction of labour, sweeping of membranes must be performed in eight women (NNT = 8). There was no evidence of a difference in the risk of maternal or neonatal infection. Discomfort during vaginal examination and other adverse effects (bleeding, irregular contractions) were more frequently reported by women allocated to sweeping. Studies comparing sweeping with prostaglandin administration are of limited sample size and do not provide evidence of benefit.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Routine use of sweeping of membranes from 38 weeks of pregnancy onwards does not seem to produce clinically important benefits. When used as a means for induction of labour, the reduction in the use of more formal methods of induction needs to be balanced against women's discomfort and other adverse effects.

摘要

背景

胎膜剥离,也称为胎膜清扫,是一种相对简单的技术,通常无需住院即可进行。在阴道检查时,临床医生将手指伸入宫颈口。然后,通过检查手指的圆周运动将胎膜的下端从子宫下段分离。这种干预有可能通过增加局部前列腺素的产生来启动分娩,从而缩短妊娠期或避免使用缩宫素、前列腺素或羊膜穿刺术进行正式引产。这是一系列使用标准化方法对宫颈成熟和引产方法进行综述的其中一篇。

目的

确定胎膜清扫用于晚期引产的效果。

检索策略

我们检索了Cochrane妊娠与分娩组试验注册库(2004年7月6日)以及相关论文的参考文献。

选择标准

将用于晚期宫颈成熟或引产的胎膜清扫与安慰剂/不治疗或在预定义引产方法列表中排在其上方的其他方法进行比较的临床试验。

数据收集与分析

制定了一项策略来处理与引产相关的大量且复杂的试验数据。这涉及两阶段的数据提取方法。

主要结果

纳入了22项试验(2797名女性),20项将胎膜清扫与不治疗进行比较,3项将胎膜清扫与前列腺素进行比较,1项将胎膜清扫与缩宫素进行比较(两项研究报告了不止一项比较)。两组之间剖宫产风险相似(相对风险(RR)0.90,95%置信区间(CI)0.70至1.15)。足月时对女性普遍进行胎膜清扫与妊娠期缩短以及超过41周(RR 0.59,95% CI 0.46至0.74)和42周(RR 0.28,95% CI 0.15至0.50)继续妊娠的频率降低有关。为避免一次正式引产,必须对8名女性进行胎膜清扫(需治疗人数 = 8)。没有证据表明母体或新生儿感染风险存在差异。分配到胎膜清扫组的女性更频繁地报告阴道检查时的不适以及其他不良反应(出血、不规则宫缩)。将胎膜清扫与前列腺素给药进行比较的研究样本量有限,未提供有益证据。

作者结论

从妊娠38周起常规使用胎膜清扫似乎不会产生临床上重要的益处。当用作引产手段时,减少更正式引产方法的使用需要与女性的不适和其他不良反应相权衡。

相似文献

1
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub2.
2
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.
3
Intravenous oxytocin alone for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD003246. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003246.
4
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(4):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.
5
Stripping/sweeping the membranes for inducing labour or preventing post-term pregnancy.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.
6
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003(1):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.
7
Vaginal prostaglandin (PGE2 and PGF2a) for induction of labour at term.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(2):CD003101. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003101.
8
Amniotomy alone for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(4):CD002862. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002862.
9
Vaginal misoprostol for cervical ripening and induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3):CD000941. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000941.
10
Intravenous prostaglandin for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;2000(4):CD002864. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002864.

引用本文的文献

4
Membrane Sweeping to Induce Labor in Post-term Pregnant Women: Success Rate and Outcomes.
Cureus. 2023 Mar 31;15(3):e36942. doi: 10.7759/cureus.36942. eCollection 2023 Mar.
5
Mechanical methods for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Mar 30;3(3):CD001233. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001233.pub4.
6
Labor induction information leaflets-Do women receive evidence-based information about the benefits and harms of labor induction?
Front Glob Womens Health. 2022 Nov 21;3:936770. doi: 10.3389/fgwh.2022.936770. eCollection 2022.
7
Dinoprostone vaginal insert (DVI) versus adjunctive sweeping of membranes and DVI for term induction of labor.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2021 Sep;47(9):3171-3178. doi: 10.1111/jog.14907. Epub 2021 Jun 23.
9
Membrane sweeping for induction of labour.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Feb 27;2(2):CD000451. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000451.pub3.
10
Recent advances in the induction of labor.
F1000Res. 2019 Oct 30;8. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.17587.1. eCollection 2019.

本文引用的文献

1
Membrane sweeping to induce labor in low-risk patients at term pregnancy: a randomised controlled trial.
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2010 Jul;23(7):681-7. doi: 10.3109/14767050903387078.
2
The effect of membrane sweeping on prelabor rupture of membranes: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2008 Jun;111(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31816fdcf3.
4
Effect of membrane sweeping at term pregnancy on duration of pregnancy and labor induction: a randomized trial.
Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2006;62(1):41-4. doi: 10.1159/000091842. Epub 2006 Mar 3.
5
Membrane sweeping at initiation of formal labor induction: a randomized controlled trial.
Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Mar;107(3):569-77. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000200094.89388.70.
6
Membrane sweeping and prevention of post-term pregnancy in low-risk pregnancies: a randomised controlled trial.
BJOG. 2006 Apr;113(4):402-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.00870.x. Epub 2006 Feb 20.
7
Membrane stripping versus single dose intracervical prostaglandin gel administration for cervical ripening.
Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2004 Sep;86(3):388-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2004.04.035.
8
Induction of labor by stripping membranes.
Obstet Gynecol. 1958 Jan;11(1):74-8.
10
Does sweeping of membranes beyond 40 weeks reduce the need for formal induction of labour?
BJOG. 2002 Jun;109(6):632-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2002.01193.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验