Pijls-Johannesma M C G, De Ruysscher D, Lambin P, Rutten I, Vansteenkiste J F
Radiation Oncology, Maastro-clinic, The Netherlands, H.Dunantstraat 5, Heerlen, Netherlands, 6419 PC.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2004(1):CD004700. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004700.pub2.
It is standard clinical practice to combine chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy in treating patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer. However, the best way to integrate both modalities is unclear.
To establish the most effective way of combining chest radiotherapy with chemotherapy for patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer in order to improve long-term survival.
The electronic databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cancerlit and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), reference lists, handsearching of journals and conference proceedings, and discussion with experts were used to identify potentially eligible trials, published and unpublished.
Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing different timing of chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer.
Seven randomised trials were reviewed. There were differences in the timing and the overall treatment time of chest radiotherapy, the overall treatment time of , and the type of chemotherapy used.
No significant differences in the 2-year and the 5-year survival were found, whether chest radiotherapy was delivered within 30 days after the start of chemotherapy or later. When the only study that delivered chest radiotherapy during cycles of non-platinum chemotherapy was excluded, a trend for the 5-year survival was observed (RR:0.93, p=0.07) in favour of early radiation, but not for the 2-year survival. Survival at 5 years, but not at 2 years, was significantly better for those having early chest radiotherapy delivered in an overall treatment time of less than 30 days compared with a longer treatment time (RR: 0.90, p=0.006). These results, however, should be interpreted with caution because the largest trial has follow-up data at three years, but not later. It remains to be seen what the effect of longer follow up will be for 5-year survival rates. Local tumour control was not significantly different between early and late chest radiotherapy. The incidence of severe pneumonitis or severe oesophagitis was not significantly different for early versus late thoracic radiotherapy. However, a trend for a higher chance to develop pneumonitis when early chest radiotherapy was delivered during non-platinum based chemotherapy was observed.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: At present, it is uncertain whether the timing of chest radiotherapy as such is important for survival. The optimal integration of chemotherapy and chest radiotherapy in patients with limited-stage small cell lung cancer is unknown. Therefore, further research is needed to establish the most effective combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy in this disease.
在治疗局限期小细胞肺癌患者时,联合化疗与胸部放疗是标准的临床实践。然而,整合这两种治疗方式的最佳方法尚不清楚。
为局限期小细胞肺癌患者确定胸部放疗与化疗联合的最有效方式,以提高长期生存率。
使用电子数据库MEDLINE、EMBASE、Cancerlit和Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(CENTRAL)、参考文献列表、手工检索期刊和会议论文集,并与专家进行讨论,以识别潜在符合条件的已发表和未发表的试验。
比较局限期小细胞肺癌患者胸部放疗不同时间安排的随机对照临床试验。
回顾了7项随机试验。胸部放疗的时间、总治疗时间以及所用化疗类型存在差异。
无论胸部放疗在化疗开始后30天内还是之后进行,2年和5年生存率均无显著差异。当排除唯一一项在非铂类化疗周期内进行胸部放疗的研究后,观察到5年生存率有一个有利于早期放疗的趋势(风险比:0.93,p = 0.07),但2年生存率无此趋势。与较长治疗时间相比,在总治疗时间少于30天内进行早期胸部放疗的患者,5年生存率显著更高,但2年生存率无此差异(风险比:0.90,p = 0.006)。然而,这些结果应谨慎解读,因为最大规模的试验只有三年的随访数据,之后没有。5年生存率受更长随访时间的影响还有待观察。早期和晚期胸部放疗的局部肿瘤控制无显著差异。早期与晚期胸部放疗的严重肺炎或严重食管炎发生率无显著差异。然而,观察到在非铂类化疗期间进行早期胸部放疗时发生肺炎的几率有升高趋势。
目前,胸部放疗的时间本身对生存率是否重要尚不确定。局限期小细胞肺癌患者化疗与胸部放疗的最佳整合方式未知。因此,需要进一步研究以确定该疾病放疗与化疗的最有效联合方式。