Costa J, Espírito-Santo C, Borges A, Ferreira J J, Coelho M, Moore P, Sampaio C
Instituto de Farmacologia e Terapêutica Geral, Faculdade de Medicina Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal, 1649-028.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD004899. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004899.pub2.
Hemifacial spasm is characterised by unilateral involuntary contractions of muscles innervated by the facial nerve. The usual cause is a vessel touching the facial nerve near its origin from the brain stem. Although it is a benign condition it can cause significant cosmetic and functional disability. It is a chronic disease and spontaneous recovery is very rare. The two treatments routinely available are microvascular decompression and Botulinum Toxin type A (BtA) muscular injections.
To determine whether botulinum toxin (BtA) is an effective and safe treatment for hemifacial spasm.
We searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group trials register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 1, 2004), MEDLINE (1977 to December 2003), EMBASE (1977 to December 2003), and reference lists of articles. We also contacted drug manufacturers and researchers in the field.
Randomised studies comparing BtA with placebo in people with hemifacial spasm.
Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.
We found only one small randomised, placebo-controlled trial involving 11 people. It was a crossover trial during which patients underwent four sets of injections, comparing placebo with three different doses of BtA - formulation Botox(r) (low dose: one-half of the intermediate dose; intermediate dose; and high dose: twice the intermediate dose), and one of placebo. In this trial BtA was superior to placebo.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this single eligible trial support the results of large, open, case-control studies showing a benefit rate between 76 and 100%. This effect size probably makes it very difficult to perform new large placebo controlled trials for hemifacial spasm. Despite the paucity of good quality controlled data, all the studies available suggest that BtA is effective and safe for treating hemifacial spasm. Future trials should explore technical factors such as the optimum treatment intervals, different injection techniques, doses, Bt types and formulations. Other issues include service delivery, quality of life, long-term efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity. BtA should be compared with surgical microvascular decompression.
面肌痉挛的特征是由面神经支配的肌肉出现单侧不自主收缩。常见病因是血管在面神经从脑干发出的起始部位附近压迫面神经。尽管这是一种良性疾病,但它会导致明显的外貌和功能障碍。它是一种慢性疾病,自发恢复极为罕见。常规可用的两种治疗方法是微血管减压术和A型肉毒杆菌毒素(BtA)肌肉注射。
确定肉毒杆菌毒素(BtA)治疗面肌痉挛是否有效且安全。
我们检索了Cochrane运动障碍组试验注册库、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(2004年第1期Cochrane图书馆)、MEDLINE(1977年至2003年12月)、EMBASE(1977年至2003年12月)以及文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了该领域的药品制造商和研究人员。
比较BtA与安慰剂治疗面肌痉挛患者的随机研究。
两名评价员独立评估试验质量并提取数据。联系研究作者获取更多信息。从试验中收集不良反应信息。
我们仅找到一项涉及11人的小型随机、安慰剂对照试验。这是一项交叉试验,在此期间患者接受了四组注射,将安慰剂与三种不同剂量的BtA(商品名Botox(r))进行比较——低剂量:中间剂量的一半;中间剂量;高剂量:中间剂量的两倍,还有一组是安慰剂。在该试验中,BtA优于安慰剂。
这项唯一符合条件的试验结果支持了大型开放性病例对照研究的结果,这些研究显示有效率在76%至100%之间。这种效应大小可能使得开展新的大型面肌痉挛安慰剂对照试验变得非常困难。尽管高质量对照数据匮乏,但所有现有研究表明,BtA治疗面肌痉挛有效且安全。未来的试验应探索技术因素,如最佳治疗间隔、不同注射技术、剂量、肉毒杆菌类型和制剂。其他问题包括服务提供、生活质量、长期疗效、安全性和免疫原性。应将BtA与外科微血管减压术进行比较。