Costa J, Espírito-Santo C, Borges A, Ferreira J J, Coelho M, Sampaio C
Instituto de Farmacologia e Terapêutica Geral, Faculdade de Medicina Lisboa, Av. Prof. Egas Moniz, Lisboa, Portugal, 1649-028.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jan 25;2005(1):CD004312. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004312.pub2.
Cervical dystonia is the most common form of focal dystonia. It is characterized by involuntary posturing of the head and frequently is associated with neck pain. Disability and social withdrawal are common. Most cases are idiopathic and generally cervical dystonia is a life-long disorder. Botulinum toxin Type A (BtA) is now the first line therapy. Before BtA, anticholinergics were the most widely accepted treatment, so it is important to understand how these two treatments compare.
To compare the clinical efficacy and safety of BtA versus anticholinergic drugs in the treatment of cervical dystonia.
We searched the Cochrane Movement Disorders Group trials register (June 2003), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 2, 2003), MEDLINE 1977 to June 2003), EMBASE (1977 to June 2003) and reference lists of articles. We also contacted manufacturers and researchers in the field.
Randomised studies comparing BtA versus any anticholinergic drug for the treatment of cervical dystonia.
Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information. Adverse effects information was collected from the trials.
We found only one trial suitable for inclusion and accordingly no meta-analysis was performed. It compared BtA versus trihexyphenidyl in 66 patients with cervical dystonia. Although this was a relatively small trial with short duration, the results can probably be generalized for the population, since the trial appears to be unbiased and produced clear clinically significant results. The results favoured BtA, and the difference was similar in size to that obtained in a systematic review comparing BtA with placebo. BtA was better tolerated.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The available evidence suggests that BtA injections provide more objective and subjective benefit than trihexyphenidyl to patients with cervical dystonia. We could not draw any conclusions about other anticholinergic drugs. Future trials should explore the role of anticholinergic drugs in patients that do not get benefit with BtA.
颈部肌张力障碍是局限性肌张力障碍最常见的形式。其特征为头部的不自主姿势,且常伴有颈部疼痛。残疾和社交退缩很常见。大多数病例为特发性,颈部肌张力障碍通常是一种终身性疾病。A型肉毒毒素(BtA)现在是一线治疗方法。在BtA出现之前,抗胆碱能药物是最广泛接受的治疗方法,因此了解这两种治疗方法的比较情况很重要。
比较BtA与抗胆碱能药物治疗颈部肌张力障碍的临床疗效和安全性。
我们检索了Cochrane运动障碍组试验注册库(2003年6月)、Cochrane对照试验中央注册库(《Cochrane图书馆》2003年第2期)、MEDLINE(1977年至2003年6月)、EMBASE(1977年至2003年6月)以及文章的参考文献列表。我们还联系了该领域的制造商和研究人员。
比较BtA与任何抗胆碱能药物治疗颈部肌张力障碍的随机研究。
两名评价者独立评估试验质量并提取数据。联系研究作者获取更多信息。从试验中收集不良反应信息。
我们仅发现一项适合纳入的试验,因此未进行荟萃分析。该试验比较了66例颈部肌张力障碍患者使用BtA与使用苯海索的情况。尽管这是一项持续时间较短的相对小型试验,但结果可能适用于该人群,因为该试验似乎无偏倚且产生了明确的具有临床意义的结果。结果支持BtA,其差异大小与一项比较BtA与安慰剂的系统评价所得结果相似。BtA的耐受性更好。
现有证据表明,对于颈部肌张力障碍患者,BtA注射比苯海索能带来更多客观和主观益处。我们无法就其他抗胆碱能药物得出任何结论。未来的试验应探索抗胆碱能药物在对BtA无反应的患者中的作用。