Suppr超能文献

他汀类药物使用指南的影响:1998 - 2002年处方趋势分析

The influence of guidelines on the use of statins: analysis of prescribing trends 1998-2002.

作者信息

Teeling M, Bennett K, Feely J

机构信息

Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Trinity College/St James's Hospital, Dublin, Ireland.

出版信息

Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;59(2):227-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02256.x.

Abstract

AIMS

To monitor statin prescribing trends over time in order to determine whether prescribers were influenced by study results and/or clinical guidelines in terms of type and dosage of statin prescribed.

METHODS

The GMS (General Medical Services) prescription database in Ireland was used to identify a cohort of patients, prescribed statins, in order to investigate prescribing trends from January 1998-December 2002. Statin prescribing rates for patients with ischaemic heart disease and diabetes were compared with rates in the general GMS population. Logistic regression analysis was used in patients with ischaemic heart disease and diabetes and adjusted odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals presented.

RESULTS

Increased statin prescribing over time was noted (test for linear trend P < 0.0001). Pravastatin was the most frequently prescribed, followed by atorvastatin; simvastatin and fluvastatin showed lower rates of prescribing. Atorvastatin showed the greatest increased rate over time. An increase in the overall dose prescribed (test for trend P < 0.01) was chiefly due to increases in pravastatin dose, but doses were still below those recommended from clinical trials. Statins were prescribed more frequently in patients with ischaemic heart disease and diabetes, 44% (95% CI 43-45%) compared with the total GMS population, 7.7% (95% CI 7.6-7.8%), by December 2002. However, statins were only prescribed to 52% (95% CI 51-53%) of ischaemic heart disease patients and 40% (95% CI 39-41%) of patients with diabetes by December 2002. Patients aged 45-64 years were more likely to receive statins, compared with those aged 65 years and older.

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that the beneficial effects of statins shown in clinical studies may not be achieved in practice.

摘要

目的

监测他汀类药物随时间的处方趋势,以确定处方者在他汀类药物的类型和剂量方面是否受到研究结果和/或临床指南的影响。

方法

利用爱尔兰的全科医疗服务(GMS)处方数据库确定一组服用他汀类药物的患者队列,以调查1998年1月至2002年12月的处方趋势。将缺血性心脏病和糖尿病患者的他汀类药物处方率与GMS总体人群的处方率进行比较。对缺血性心脏病和糖尿病患者进行逻辑回归分析,并给出调整后的优势比和95%置信区间。

结果

注意到他汀类药物的处方量随时间增加(线性趋势检验P<0.0001)。普伐他汀是最常被处方的药物,其次是阿托伐他汀;辛伐他汀和氟伐他汀的处方率较低。阿托伐他汀随时间的增加率最高。总体处方剂量增加(趋势检验P<0.01)主要是由于普伐他汀剂量增加,但仍低于临床试验推荐的剂量。到2002年12月,缺血性心脏病和糖尿病患者中他汀类药物的处方频率更高,分别为44%(95%置信区间43-45%),而GMS总体人群为7.7%(95%置信区间7.6-7.8%)。然而,到2002年12月,只有52%(95%置信区间51-53%)的缺血性心脏病患者和40%(95%置信区间39-41%)的糖尿病患者服用了他汀类药物。与65岁及以上的患者相比,45-64岁的患者更有可能接受他汀类药物治疗。

结论

这些发现表明,他汀类药物在临床研究中显示的有益效果在实际应用中可能无法实现。

相似文献

1
The influence of guidelines on the use of statins: analysis of prescribing trends 1998-2002.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Feb;59(2):227-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02256.x.
2
Statin prescribing in the elderly in the Netherlands: a pharmacy database time trend study.
Drugs Aging. 2010 Jul 1;27(7):589-96. doi: 10.2165/11537330-000000000-00000.
3
Trends in co-prescribing of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers in Ireland.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2011 Mar;71(3):458-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.2010.03835.x.
4
Age, sex and practice variations in the use of statins in general practice in England and Wales.
J Public Health Med. 2000 Sep;22(3):275-9. doi: 10.1093/pubmed/22.3.275.
5
A 10-Year Trend in Statin Use Among Older Adults in Australia: an Analysis Using National Pharmacy Claims Data.
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018 Jun;32(3):265-272. doi: 10.1007/s10557-018-6794-x.
8
Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?
Heart. 2003 Apr;89(4):417-21. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.4.417.
10
Impact of high dose statin trials on hospital prescribers.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;63(1):65-72. doi: 10.1007/s00228-006-0208-x. Epub 2006 Nov 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Statin Prescription Patterns Among Elderly Patients with Type 2 Diabetes: A Cross-Sectional Study in Lebanon.
Drugs Real World Outcomes. 2023 Mar;10(1):159-166. doi: 10.1007/s40801-022-00335-1. Epub 2022 Nov 23.
3
Statin Therapy Prescribing for Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Review of Current Evidence and Challenges.
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2017 Apr-Jun;9(2):80-87. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.JPBS_30_17.
6
Trends in statin therapy initiation during the period 2000-2010 in Israel.
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 May;70(5):557-64. doi: 10.1007/s00228-013-1637-y. Epub 2014 Jan 25.
9
Statin prescribing in the elderly in the Netherlands: a pharmacy database time trend study.
Drugs Aging. 2010 Jul 1;27(7):589-96. doi: 10.2165/11537330-000000000-00000.
10
Patterns and predictors of statin prescription in patients with type 2 diabetes.
Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009 May 13;8:25. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-8-25.

本文引用的文献

1
The prescribing of lipid lowering drugs during a 1-year period: analysis of 7490 health insurance files.
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2000 Mar;9(2):119-26. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1557(200003/04)9:2<119::AID-PDS476>3.0.CO;2-R.
5
A safety look at currently available statins.
Expert Opin Drug Saf. 2002 Sep;1(3):269-74. doi: 10.1517/14740338.1.3.269.
7
Evidence for an age and gender bias in the secondary prevention of ischaemic heart disease in primary care.
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2003 Jun;55(6):604-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2125.2003.01795.x.
8
The lipid and non-lipid effects of statins.
Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Jul;99(1):95-112. doi: 10.1016/s0163-7258(03)00055-x.
9
Evolution of statin prescribing 1994-2001: a case of agism but not of sexism?
Heart. 2003 Apr;89(4):417-21. doi: 10.1136/heart.89.4.417.
10
Risk for myopathy with statin therapy in high-risk patients.
Arch Intern Med. 2003 Mar 10;163(5):553-64. doi: 10.1001/archinte.163.5.553.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验