Gunasekaran K, Sahu S S, Jambulingam P, Das P K
Vector Control Research Centre, Medical Complex, Indira Nagar, Pondicherry 605 006, India.
Trop Med Int Health. 2005 Feb;10(2):160-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3156.2004.01369.x.
This study from two districts of Orissa State which are endemic for Plasmodium falciparum transmitted by Anopheles fluviatilis and A. culicifacies investigated the impact of dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane (DDT) indoor residual spraying, in view of the ongoing discussion on phasing out DDT in India. Based on their high annual parasite incidence and logistical considerations, 26 villages in Malkangiri and 28 in Koraput district were selected for DDT spraying. For comparison, six and four unsprayed villages were chosen from the same districts. In each district, the prevalence of malaria infection and incidence of malaria fever, indoor resting density and parous rate of the vectors, and their susceptibility to DDT were monitored in six and three villages selected randomly from the sprayed and unsprayed groups respectively. Anopheles fluviatilis was susceptible to DDT while A. culicifacies was resistant. DDT residual spraying with 1 g/m(2), was carried out in October-November 2001. Spraying 74-86% of human dwellings and 100% of cattle sheds brought down the indoor resting density of A. fluviatilis by 93-95%. This was associated with a significant reduction of incidence of malaria fever as well as prevalence of malaria infection from November to February in both districts. The spraying also seemed to impact on vector longevity, and a residual effect of DDT on the sprayed walls was observed up to 10-12 weeks despite re-plastering. Hence DDT spraying can still be an effective tool for controlling fluviatilis-transmitted malaria. Although this species is exophilic, its nocturnal resting behaviour facilitates its contact with the sprayed surfaces. DDT is still useful for residual spraying in India, particularly in areas where the vectors are endophilic and not resistant.
这项研究来自奥里萨邦的两个地区,这两个地区是由溪流按蚊和库氏按蚊传播恶性疟原虫的流行区,鉴于印度正在讨论逐步淘汰滴滴涕,该研究调查了滴滴涕室内滞留喷洒的影响。基于其高年度寄生虫发病率和后勤考虑因素,在马尔康吉里区选择了26个村庄,在科拉普特区选择了28个村庄进行滴滴涕喷洒。为作比较,从同一地区分别选取了6个和4个未喷洒的村庄。在每个区,分别从喷洒组和未喷洒组中随机选取6个和3个村庄,监测疟疾感染率、疟疾发热发病率、媒介的室内栖息密度和产卵率,以及它们对滴滴涕的易感性。溪流按蚊对滴滴涕敏感,而库氏按蚊具有抗性。2001年10月至11月进行了每平方米1克的滴滴涕滞留喷洒。对74 - 86%的人类住所和100%的牛棚进行喷洒,使溪流按蚊的室内栖息密度降低了93%至95%。这与两个区11月至2月疟疾发热发病率以及疟疾感染率的显著降低相关。喷洒似乎还影响了媒介寿命,尽管重新粉刷,但在喷洒过的墙壁上观察到滴滴涕的残留效果可持续10至12周。因此,滴滴涕喷洒仍然可以是控制由溪流按蚊传播的疟疾的有效工具。尽管该物种喜外栖,但它的夜间栖息行为便于其与喷洒表面接触。滴滴涕在印度仍可用于滞留喷洒,特别是在媒介为嗜内性且无抗性的地区。