Suppr超能文献

氯巴占间歇疗法用于热性惊厥

Intermittent clobazam therapy in febrile seizures.

作者信息

Rose Winsley, Kirubakaran Chellam, Scott Julius Xavier

机构信息

Christian Medical College and Hospita, Vellore, Tamil Nadu, India.

出版信息

Indian J Pediatr. 2005 Jan;72(1):31-3. doi: 10.1007/BF02760577.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of intermittent clobazam therapy in preventing the recurrence of febrile seizures and to assess its safety.

METHODS

The study was a prospective, randomized, double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted in the Department of Child Health, Christian Medical College Hospital, Vellore between July 2001 and September 2002. Neurologically normal children between 6 months and 3 years of age with a history of febrile seizures and no evidence of acute CNS infection or EEG abnormality were included into the study. 19 children in a clobazam group and 20 in the placebo group were randomly allocated. Temperature reduction measures with paracetamol and tepid sponging were advised to all children. In addition the dispensed medication was to be administered at the onset of fever and continued for 48 hours irrespective of the duration of fever. The children were then monitored for seizures and adverse effects of clobazam. The children were followed up for a mean period of 9.9 months. The analysis was done on the number of febrile episodes in both the groups.

RESULTS

There were a total of 110 episodes of fever during the study period. Mean number of febrile episodes in the clobazam group was 3.1 and in placebo group 2.56. Six (12.5%) of the 48 episodes in placebo group and one (1.7%) of 60 episodes in clobazam group had seizure recurrence. This was statistically significant (p = 0.01). Drowsiness and weakness were present equally in both clobazam and placebo groups whereas ataxia was present only in the clobazam group, the difference being statistically significant (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Intermittent clobazam therapy is an effective measure in the prevention of recurrence of febrile seizures. The ataxia due to clobazam was much lower than that reported with diazepam.

摘要

目的

评估间歇性氯巴占治疗预防热性惊厥复发的疗效并评估其安全性。

方法

本研究是一项前瞻性、随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验,于2001年7月至2002年9月在韦洛尔基督教医学院医院儿童健康科进行。纳入研究的是年龄在6个月至3岁之间、有热性惊厥病史且无急性中枢神经系统感染或脑电图异常证据的神经功能正常儿童。随机分配19名儿童至氯巴占组,20名儿童至安慰剂组。建议所有儿童使用对乙酰氨基酚和温水擦浴进行降温措施。此外,所分发的药物在发热开始时给药,并持续48小时,无论发热持续时间长短。然后对儿童进行惊厥监测及氯巴占不良反应监测。对儿童进行了平均9.9个月的随访。对两组的发热发作次数进行分析。

结果

研究期间共有110次发热发作。氯巴占组发热发作的平均次数为3.1次,安慰剂组为2.56次。安慰剂组48次发作中有6次(12.5%)出现惊厥复发,氯巴占组60次发作中有1次(1.7%)出现惊厥复发。这具有统计学意义(p = 0.01)。氯巴占组和安慰剂组出现嗜睡和虚弱的情况相同,而共济失调仅出现在氯巴占组,差异具有统计学意义(p = 0.04)。

结论

间歇性氯巴占治疗是预防热性惊厥复发的有效措施。氯巴占所致的共济失调远低于地西泮报道的情况。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验