Suppr超能文献

撤机患者的呼吸力学

Respiratory mechanics in the patient who is weaning from the ventilator.

作者信息

MacIntyre Neil R

机构信息

Respiratory Care Services, PO Box 3911, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA.

出版信息

Respir Care. 2005 Feb;50(2):275-86; discussion 284-6.

Abstract

Ventilator management of the patient recovering from acute respiratory failure must balance competing objectives. On the one hand, aggressive efforts to promptly discontinue support and remove the artificial airway reduce the risk of ventilator-induced lung injury, nosocomial pneumonia, airway trauma from the endotracheal tube, and unnecessary sedation. On the other hand, overly aggressive, premature discontinuation of ventilatory support or removal of the artificial airway can precipitate ventilatory muscle fatigue, gas-exchange failure, and loss of airway protection. To help clinicians balance these concerns, 2 important research projects were undertaken in 1999-2001. The first was a comprehensive evidence-based literature review of the ventilator-discontinuation process, performed by the McMaster University research group on evidence-based medicine. The second was the development (by the American Association for Respiratory Care, American College of Chest Physicians, and Society of Critical Care Medicine) of a set of evidence-based guidelines based on the latter literature review. From those 2 projects, several themes emerged. First, frequent patient-assessment is required to determine whether the patient needs continued ventilatory support, from both the ventilator and the artificial airway. Second, we should continuously re-evaluate the overall medical management of patients who continue to require ventilatory support, to assure that we address all factors contributing to ventilator-dependence. Third, ventilatory support strategies should be aimed at maximizing patient comfort and unloading the respiratory muscles. Fourth, patients who require prolonged ventilatory support beyond the intensive care unit should go to specialized facilities that can provide gradual reduction of support. Fifth, many of these management objectives can be effectively carried out with protocols executed by nonphysicians.

摘要

急性呼吸衰竭康复期患者的呼吸机管理必须平衡相互矛盾的目标。一方面,积极努力迅速停止支持并移除人工气道可降低呼吸机相关性肺损伤、医院获得性肺炎、气管插管引起的气道创伤以及不必要镇静的风险。另一方面,过于激进、过早停止通气支持或移除人工气道可能会导致呼吸肌疲劳、气体交换衰竭以及气道保护功能丧失。为帮助临床医生平衡这些问题,在1999年至2001年开展了两项重要研究项目。第一项是由麦克马斯特大学循证医学研究小组对呼吸机撤机过程进行的全面循证文献综述。第二项是(由美国呼吸护理协会、美国胸科医师学会和危重病医学会)根据后者的文献综述制定一套循证指南。从这两个项目中,出现了几个主题。首先,需要对患者进行频繁评估,以确定患者是否需要呼吸机和人工气道的持续通气支持。其次,对于仍需要通气支持的患者,我们应持续重新评估其整体医疗管理,以确保我们解决导致呼吸机依赖的所有因素。第三,通气支持策略应旨在最大程度提高患者舒适度并减轻呼吸肌负担。第四,在重症监护病房之外需要长期通气支持的患者应前往能够提供逐步减少支持的专业机构。第五,许多这些管理目标可以通过非医生执行的方案有效实现。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验