Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Duke University Hospital, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA.
Respir Care. 2013 Jun;58(6):1074-86. doi: 10.4187/respcare.02284.
The ventilator discontinuation process is an essential component of overall ventilator management. Undue delay leads to excess stay, iatrogenic lung injury, unnecessary sedation, and even higher mortality. On the other hand, premature withdrawal can lead to muscle fatigue, dangerous gas exchange impairment, loss of airway protection, and also a higher mortality. Continued ventilator dependence can be a result of persistent illness or can be a result of poor management. It is obviously important for the clinician to be able to assess both of these issues. An evidence-based task force has recommended regular assessments focusing on the causes of ventilator dependence, regular assessments for evidence of disease stability/reversal, use of regular spontaneous breathing trials (SBTs) as the primary assessment tool for ventilator discontinuation potential, use of separate assessments to evaluate the need for an artificial airway in patients tolerating the SBT, and the use of comfortable, interactive ventilator modes (that do not need to be "weaned") in between regular SBTs. More recent developments have focused on the importance of linking sedation reduction protocols to ventilator discontinuation protocols. Patients with repeated SBT failures are often considered to require prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV). These patients often receive tracheostomies and are probably better managed with more gradual reductions in support and gradually lengthened spontaneous breathing periods. PMV patients have a high 1-year mortality, and many may ultimately require lifelong support. This evidence base is growing, but the earlier guidelines are standing the test of time. Indeed, practice patterns are evolving in accordance with them. Nevertheless, there is still room for improvement, and further clinical studies, especially in the patient requiring PMV, are needed.
呼吸机撤离过程是整体呼吸机管理的重要组成部分。过度延迟会导致过度停留、医源性肺损伤、不必要的镇静,甚至更高的死亡率。另一方面,过早撤机会导致肌肉疲劳、危险的气体交换障碍、气道保护丧失,死亡率也会更高。持续的呼吸机依赖可能是疾病持续存在的结果,也可能是管理不善的结果。临床医生能够评估这两个问题显然很重要。一个基于证据的工作组建议定期评估,重点关注呼吸机依赖的原因,定期评估疾病稳定/逆转的证据,使用定期的自主呼吸试验(SBT)作为评估呼吸机撤机潜力的主要工具,使用单独的评估来评估在耐受 SBT 的患者中是否需要人工气道,以及在常规 SBT 之间使用舒适、互动的呼吸机模式(不需要“脱机”)。最近的发展重点是将镇静剂减少方案与呼吸机撤离方案联系起来的重要性。反复 SBT 失败的患者通常被认为需要长时间的机械通气(PMV)。这些患者经常接受气管切开术,可能需要更缓慢地减少支持并逐渐延长自主呼吸时间,才能得到更好的管理。PMV 患者的 1 年死亡率很高,许多患者最终可能需要终身支持。这方面的证据在不断增加,但早期的指南经受住了时间的考验。实际上,实践模式正在根据这些指南进行演变。然而,仍有改进的空间,需要进一步的临床研究,特别是在需要 PMV 的患者中。