Mercier P, Precious D
Department of Oral Surgery, St. Mary's Hospital, Montreal, Canada.
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1992 Feb;21(1):17-27. doi: 10.1016/s0901-5027(05)80447-3.
A critical review of the literature about risks and benefits of the removal of impacted 3rd molar teeth is presented in 4 categories: risk of non-intervention, risk of intervention, benefit of non-intervention and benefit of intervention. There are well-defined criteria for removal of impacted 3rd molar teeth. Absolute indications and contra-indications for the removal of asymptomatic 3rd molar teeth cannot be established because no long-term studies exist which validate the benefit to the patient either of early removal or of deliberate retention of these teeth. The prudent course of action for the clinician to follow is based on rational clinical decision-making using traditional methods of evaluation to effect the optimal outcome, keeping the interests of the individual patient above all else.
本文对有关拔除阻生第三磨牙的风险和益处的文献进行了批判性综述,分为四类:不干预的风险、干预的风险、不干预的益处和干预的益处。拔除阻生第三磨牙有明确的标准。由于不存在长期研究来证实早期拔除或刻意保留这些牙齿对患者的益处,因此无法确定拔除无症状第三磨牙的绝对适应证和禁忌证。临床医生应遵循的谨慎做法是基于合理的临床决策,采用传统评估方法以实现最佳结果,将个体患者的利益置于首位。