• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

超声骨刀与传统涡轮钻在下颌第三磨牙阻生中应用的三维面部肿胀评价:一项随机临床试验。

Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of piezo-electric vs conventional drilling bur surgery of impacted lower third molar: a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphological and Functional Imaging, University of Messina, Via C. Valeria, 98125, Messina, Italy.

出版信息

BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02910-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12903-023-02910-6
PMID:37085833
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10120228/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among the post-surgical complications of lower wisdom teeth surgery, swelling is considered by patients one of the most impairing, with both social and biological influences and impacting patients' quality of life. Aim of the study was to evaluate the swelling following the osteotomy when performed with drilling burs versus piezo-electric instruments in the mandibular impacted third molar extraction, using a facial reconstruction software.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A randomized, split-mouth, single-blind study was conducted on patients, ranging between 18 and 40 years of age, requiring lower third molars extraction and referred at the Oral Surgery Unit of the School of Dentistry of the University of Messina. Twenty-two patients were recruited during an 8 months period according to the following criteria: good general health conditions; bilateral, symmetrical, impacted third molars; no use of medication that would influence or alter wound healing; no temporomandibular joint disorder history; no smoking. All patients underwent bilateral surgical removal. For each patient, a facial scan was obtained prior to the surgical procedures. The two extractions were conducted performing, in a randomized way, osteotomy with rotatory burs or use of piezo surgical instruments. Facial scans were repeated at 3 and 7 days after the surgical procedures. Volumetric differences were calculated via superimposition using a dedicated software. The data obtained were processed using paired t-test.

RESULTS

The results obtained from our study showed no significant differences between two groups regarding post-operative swelling. To the best of our knowledge, this study represents the first experience of using an objective method that can be reproducible on the collection of patients' clinical parameters.

CONCLUSIONS

The 3D digital analysis, in the evaluation of facial swelling, is a technique of simple application, objective, reproducible, reliable, decreasing the variables of error. Based on these data, it is possible to conclude that piezo surgery is a safe way for performing the osteotomies during third molar surgery. However, regarding the post-operative swelling, it does not show an advantage over classical rotary instruments.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (ID: NCT05488028, on 04/08/2022). Approved by Ethical Committee of Messina: (ID 01-2020, on 27/04/2020).

摘要

背景

在下颌智齿手术后的并发症中,肿胀被患者认为是最具破坏性的一种,它既有社会影响,也有生物学影响,会影响患者的生活质量。本研究旨在使用面部重建软件评估在劈开下颌阻生第三磨牙时使用旋转钻头和超声骨刀进行截骨术后的肿胀情况。

材料和方法

这是一项在年龄在 18 至 40 岁之间、需要拔除下颌第三磨牙并被转诊到墨西拿大学牙科学院口腔外科的患者中进行的随机、劈裂口腔、单盲研究。在 8 个月的时间里,根据以下标准招募了 22 名患者:一般健康状况良好;双侧、对称、阻生的第三磨牙;没有使用会影响或改变伤口愈合的药物;没有颞下颌关节紊乱病史;不吸烟。所有患者均行双侧手术切除。在手术前,每位患者都进行了面部扫描。以随机的方式,通过旋转钻头或使用超声骨刀进行截骨术。在手术后 3 天和 7 天重复进行面部扫描。通过使用专用软件进行叠加计算体积差异。使用配对 t 检验处理获得的数据。

结果

我们的研究结果显示,两组患者在术后肿胀方面没有显著差异。据我们所知,这是首次使用可以在收集患者临床参数方面具有可重复性的客观方法进行的研究。

结论

在评估面部肿胀方面,3D 数字分析是一种简单应用、客观、可重复、可靠、减少误差变量的技术。基于这些数据,可以得出结论,超声骨刀在第三磨牙手术中进行截骨术是一种安全的方法。然而,在术后肿胀方面,它并没有比传统的旋转器械显示出优势。

试验注册

在 ClinicalTrials.gov 注册(ID:NCT05488028,于 2022 年 8 月 4 日)。经墨西拿伦理委员会批准(ID 01-2020,于 2020 年 4 月 27 日)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/3f9d22569504/12903_2023_2910_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/dc44e9890d18/12903_2023_2910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/3781d94b2430/12903_2023_2910_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/803c10f1efe4/12903_2023_2910_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/58e423c07cc4/12903_2023_2910_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/5daf31fb16f2/12903_2023_2910_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/9b0a52edeb2e/12903_2023_2910_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/b43544520a97/12903_2023_2910_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/65a86d008520/12903_2023_2910_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/3f9d22569504/12903_2023_2910_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/dc44e9890d18/12903_2023_2910_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/3781d94b2430/12903_2023_2910_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/803c10f1efe4/12903_2023_2910_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/58e423c07cc4/12903_2023_2910_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/5daf31fb16f2/12903_2023_2910_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/9b0a52edeb2e/12903_2023_2910_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/b43544520a97/12903_2023_2910_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/65a86d008520/12903_2023_2910_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/71ac/10120228/3f9d22569504/12903_2023_2910_Fig9_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional facial swelling evaluation of piezo-electric vs conventional drilling bur surgery of impacted lower third molar: a randomized clinical trial.超声骨刀与传统涡轮钻在下颌第三磨牙阻生中应用的三维面部肿胀评价:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Apr 21;23(1):233. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-02910-6.
2
Piezo-surgery technique and intramuscular dexamethasone injection to reduce postoperative pain after impacted mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.超声骨刀法结合肌内注射地塞米松减轻下颌阻生第三磨牙术后疼痛的随机临床研究。
BMC Oral Health. 2021 Aug 11;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12903-021-01759-x.
3
A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal.一项评估压电手术与传统技术在拔除下颌智齿时的性能的半口随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 13.
4
A comparative analysis of postoperative morbidity and alveolar bone regeneration following surgical extraction of ımpacted lower third molar teeth using piezosurgery and conventional ınstruments: a split-mouth clinical ınvestigation.超声骨刀与传统器械在下颌第三磨牙阻生齿拔除术中术后并发症及牙槽骨再生的对比分析:一项随机对照临床研究。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Sep 14;29(1):460. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-02051-8.
5
Comparative Study of Piezoelectric and Rotary Osteotomy Technique for Third Molar Impaction.第三磨牙阻生的压电与旋转截骨技术对比研究
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2017 Jan 1;18(1):60-64. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1990.
6
Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.压电技术与传统旋转技术用于拔除阻生第三磨牙:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(41):e1685. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001685.
7
A Clinical Comparison of Er:YAG Laser, Piezosurgery, and Conventional Bur Methods in the Impacted Third Molar Surgery.《Er:YAG 激光、超声骨刀与传统涡轮钻在下颌第三磨牙阻生手术中临床效果比较》
Photobiomodul Photomed Laser Surg. 2023 Jun;41(6):283-290. doi: 10.1089/photob.2022.0142.
8
Comparison of clinical parameters and environmental noise levels between regular surgery and piezosurgery for extraction of impacted third molars.常规手术与压电手术拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的临床参数及环境噪声水平比较。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2015 Oct;114(10):929-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Mar 21.
9
A split-mouth study comparing piezo electric surgery and traditional rotary burs on impacted third molars in young patients: an intraoperative and postoperative evaluation.一项针对年轻患者阻生第三磨牙,比较压电手术与传统旋转牙钻的半口对照研究:术中和术后评估。
Minerva Stomatol. 2020 Oct;69(5):278-285. doi: 10.23736/S0026-4970.20.04349-6. Epub 2020 May 14.
10
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.下颌智齿拔除的手术技术。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical efficacy of magnet-assisted removal for dental high-speed dental handpiece broken Burs in mandibular third molar surgery: a retrospective study.磁辅助取出在下颌第三磨牙手术中折断于高速牙科手机的车针的临床疗效:一项回顾性研究
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 15;25(1):1161. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06513-1.
2
Piezoelectric and conventional rotary techniques for mandibular impacted third molar extraction: A comparative study.下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除的压电与传统旋转技术:一项比较研究。
Bioinformation. 2025 Apr 30;21(4):699-702. doi: 10.6026/973206300210699. eCollection 2025.
3
Comparative Outcomes of Different Surgical Techniques for the Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars.

本文引用的文献

1
Evaluation of Adjuvant Systems in Non-Surgical Peri-Implant Treatment: A Literature Review.非手术种植体周围治疗中辅助系统的评估:文献综述
Healthcare (Basel). 2022 May 11;10(5):886. doi: 10.3390/healthcare10050886.
2
Flapless and bone-preserving extraction of partially impacted mandibular third molars with dynamic navigation technology. A report of three cases.使用动态导航技术进行下颌第三磨牙部分阻生的无瓣保骨拔除术。三例报告。
Int J Comput Dent. 2021 Sep 23;24(3):253-262.
3
Probiotics diminish the post-operatory pain following mandibular third molar extraction: a randomised double-blind controlled trial (pilot study).
不同手术技术拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的比较结果
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2025 May;17(Suppl 1):S473-S475. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_1430_24. Epub 2025 Feb 25.
4
Application of the "" shaped crown sectioning method in minimally invasive extraction of mandibular horizontally impacted teeth.“ ”形冠部截骨法在下颌水平阻生牙微创拔除中的应用
Medicine (Baltimore). 2025 May 16;104(20):e42531. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000042531.
5
Lingual plate thickness influences cortical bone injury during lower third molar extraction: A cone beam computed tomography study.舌侧骨板厚度对下颌第三磨牙拔除术中皮质骨损伤的影响:一项锥形束计算机断层扫描研究。
Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2025 Apr 21;29(1):88. doi: 10.1007/s10006-025-01386-8.
6
Evaluation of the effect of manual lymphatic drainage method on edema, pain and trismus after impacted bilateral mandibular third molar surgery: a randomized clinical trial.评估手法淋巴引流法对双侧下颌阻生第三磨牙拔除术后水肿、疼痛和牙关紧闭的影响:一项随机临床试验。
BMC Oral Health. 2025 Mar 26;25(1):438. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-05817-6.
7
Evaluation of patient comfort and satisfaction after the surgical removal of mandibular impacted molars using a piezo-electric technique: A randomized double-blind clinical trial.使用压电技术拔除下颌阻生磨牙后患者舒适度和满意度的评估:一项随机双盲临床试验。
J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2025 Jan-Feb;15(1):108-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2024.12.009. Epub 2024 Dec 24.
8
Piezosurgery in Third Molar Extractions: A Systematic Review.第三磨牙拔除术中的压电外科手术:一项系统评价
J Pers Med. 2024 Dec 19;14(12):1158. doi: 10.3390/jpm14121158.
9
Automated pipeline for linear and volumetric assessment of facial swelling after third molar surgery.用于评估第三磨牙手术后面部肿胀的线性和体积的自动化流程。
BMC Oral Health. 2024 Nov 19;24(1):1404. doi: 10.1186/s12903-024-05193-7.
10
Comparative Analysis of Surgical Techniques for Wisdom Tooth Extraction.智齿拔除手术技术的比较分析
J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2024 Jul;16(Suppl 3):S2576-S2578. doi: 10.4103/jpbs.jpbs_260_24. Epub 2024 Jun 7.
益生菌可减轻下颌第三磨牙拔除术后疼痛:一项随机双盲对照试验(初步研究)。
Benef Microbes. 2020 Nov 15;11(7):631-639. doi: 10.3920/BM2020.0090. Epub 2020 Oct 30.
4
Comparison of Surgical Outcome after Impacted Third Molar Surgery Using Piezotome and a Conventional Rotary Handpiece.使用超声骨刀与传统旋转牙钻进行阻生第三磨牙手术后的手术效果比较。
Contemp Clin Dent. 2018 Sep;9(Suppl 2):S318-S324. doi: 10.4103/ccd.ccd_354_18.
5
Impact of electro-neuro-feedback on postoperative outcome of impacted lower third molar surgery.电神经反馈对下颌阻生第三磨牙手术后结果的影响。
Eur J Dent. 2018 Jan-Mar;12(1):77-88. doi: 10.4103/ejd.ejd_296_17.
6
Comparison of Piezosurgery and Conventional Rotary Instruments for Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: A Randomized Controlled Clinical and Radiographic Trial.压电手术与传统旋转器械拔除下颌阻生第三磨牙的比较:一项随机对照临床及影像学试验
Int J Dent. 2016;2016:8169356. doi: 10.1155/2016/8169356. Epub 2016 Aug 14.
7
Does Vitamin D3 Have an Impact on Clinical and Biochemical Parameters Related to Third Molar Surgery.维生素D3对与第三磨牙手术相关的临床和生化参数有影响吗?
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Mar;27(2):469-76. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002389.
8
Does the piezoelectric surgical technique produce fewer postoperative sequelae after lower third molar surgery than conventional rotary instruments? A systematic review and meta analysis.与传统旋转器械相比,压电手术技术在下颌第三磨牙手术后产生的术后后遗症是否更少?一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2016 Mar;45(3):383-91. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2015.10.005. Epub 2015 Nov 11.
9
Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Rotary Techniques for Impacted Third Molar Extraction: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.压电技术与传统旋转技术用于拔除阻生第三磨牙:一项随机对照试验的Meta分析
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Oct;94(41):e1685. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001685.
10
A split-mouth randomized clinical trial to evaluate the performance of piezosurgery compared with traditional technique in lower wisdom tooth removal.一项评估压电手术与传统技术在拔除下颌智齿时的性能的半口随机临床试验。
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Oct;72(10):1890-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.05.002. Epub 2014 May 13.