Suppr超能文献

采用或不采用椎间盘内电热疗法(IDET)的髓核成形术治疗腰椎间盘突出症。

Nucleoplasty with or without intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET) as a treatment for lumbar herniated disc.

作者信息

Cohen Steven P, Williams Shawn, Kurihara Connie, Griffith Scott, Larkin Thomas M

机构信息

Pain Management Center, Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005 Feb;18 Suppl:S119-24. doi: 10.1097/01.bsd.0000127823.54485.3f.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

In industrialized societies, the prevalence of radicular low back pain has exploded in recent years. The growing economic and personal costs of this challenging entity have led to the development of a wide array of new treatments, ranging from pharmacotherapy with neuropathic medications to open surgical treatment. Among the therapeutic options to emerge are a plethora of minimally invasive treatments aimed at removing nuclear material and lowering intradiscal pressure through devices inserted percutaneously into intervertebral discs. Yet there is a compelling lack of clinical evidence to support the use of these procedures. This study was undertaken to determine the treatment outcomes of 16 consecutive patients with lumbar radicular pain secondary to a herniated disc who underwent nucleoplasty as their primary therapy.

METHODS

Included in this series were nine patients with significant axial back pain, sitting intolerance, and positive discography who also underwent intradiscal electrothermal therapy (IDET). Among the 7 patients who only had nucleoplasty, 4 had 2 discs treated and 3 had 1 disc. In the 9 patients who also had IDET, 6 had 1 disc treated and 3 had 2 discs treated. Of the 32 total disc treatments, 20 were at L5-S1, 10 were at L4-5 and 2, one each for IDET and nucleoplasty, were at L3-4.

RESULTS

In the overall cohort, the average Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain score decreased from 6.7 to 5.6 at a mean follow-up of 9 months. In the seven patients who underwent only nucleoplasty, the mean VAS score decreased from 6.0 to 4.8. Only one patient reported a >/=50% reduction in pain score.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that with use of the present selection criteria, nucleoplasty is not an effective long-term treatment for lumbar radiculopathy, either alone or with IDET. Before conducting future clinical trials, we recommend modifying these criteria to include only those patients with small (<6-mm) contained disc herniations whose annular integrity is documented by computed tomography discography and corresponding radicular symptoms confirmed by either selective nerve root blocks or electromyography and nerve conduction studies.

摘要

背景与目的

在工业化社会中,近年来根性腰痛的患病率急剧上升。这种具有挑战性的疾病不断增加的经济和个人成本促使了一系列新治疗方法的发展,从使用治疗神经病变的药物进行药物治疗到开放手术治疗。出现的治疗选择中,有大量旨在通过经皮插入椎间盘的装置去除核物质并降低椎间盘内压力的微创治疗方法。然而,令人信服的是,缺乏支持使用这些手术的临床证据。本研究旨在确定16例因椎间盘突出继发腰椎根性疼痛且接受髓核成形术作为主要治疗方法的连续患者的治疗结果。

方法

该系列包括9例有明显轴向背痛、不耐久坐且椎间盘造影阳性的患者,他们还接受了椎间盘内电热疗法(IDET)。在仅接受髓核成形术的7例患者中,4例治疗了2个椎间盘,3例治疗了1个椎间盘。在也接受IDET的9例患者中,6例治疗了1个椎间盘,3例治疗了2个椎间盘。在总共32次椎间盘治疗中,20次在L5 - S1,10次在L4 - 5,2次(IDET和髓核成形术各1次)在L3 - 4。

结果

在整个队列中,平均随访9个月时,视觉模拟量表(VAS)疼痛评分从6.7降至5.6。在仅接受髓核成形术的7例患者中,平均VAS评分从6.0降至4.8。只有1例患者报告疼痛评分降低≥50%。

结论

我们得出结论,按照目前的选择标准,髓核成形术无论是单独使用还是与IDET联合使用,都不是治疗腰椎神经根病的有效长期治疗方法。在进行未来的临床试验之前,我们建议修改这些标准,仅纳入那些椎间盘突出较小(<6毫米)且通过计算机断层扫描椎间盘造影记录了纤维环完整性、并通过选择性神经根阻滞或肌电图及神经传导研究证实有相应根性症状的患者。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验