Suppr超能文献

经腹腹腔镜疝修补术还是完全腹膜外腹腔镜疝修补术?

Transabdominal or totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair?

作者信息

Cohen R V, Alvarez G, Roll S, Garcia M E, Kawahara N, Schiavon C A, Schaffa T D, Pereira P R, Margarido N F, Rodrigues A J

机构信息

Department of Surgery, University of São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1998 Aug;8(4):264-8.

PMID:9703597
Abstract

Laparoscopic repair of inguinal hernias follows some principles that have already proven its efficiency, as a posterior approach and the prosthetic repair that allows a "tension-free" repair with consequent early return to work and low recurrence rate. To determine the most appropriate laparoscopic repair, we compared the transabdominal preperitoneal (TAPP) and the totally extraperitoneal (TEP) approach. Patients undergoing TAPP and TEP were compared regarding technical feasibility and difficulties, time until return to work and follow-up, including intraoperative and postoperative complications. Seventy-eight patients (108 hernias) were submitted to TAPP and 67 (100 hernias) were repaired through TEP. All data were analyzed by Yates-corrected chi-square test to qualitative analysis of each group and p < or = 0.05 was considered significant. Both procedures were indicated mainly for bilateral and/or recurrent hernias (68%). The operative time was shorter in TAPP (not statistically significant). Surgeons complained of more technical difficulties while performing the TEP approach (70% complaints of difficulty in TEP--four conversions to TAPP). There was no difference in hospital stay (mean of 30 h) and return to work (TAPP 7 days and TEP 5.5 days). Regarding the complication rate (TAPP = 20.5% and TEP = 13.5%; not significant), none were related to the pneumoperitoneum technique or its systemic effects. In the TAPP approach, two trocar site hernias occurred, and in the TEP approach, one severe cellulitis occurred, which was managed without surgical intervention. The mean follow-up period for each procedure was not the same, so the recurrence rates are not comparable statistically (rate of 1.85% in TAPP and 0 in TEP). Both techniques are safe and have the same advantages, but TAPP is easier: a better view of the anatomy is achieved, shortening the learning curve. We suggest that TAPP can be an adequate laparoscopic approach to groin hernias. A longer follow-up period and more cases are needed to determine recurrence rates.

摘要

腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术遵循一些已被证明有效的原则,如后路手术和假体修补术,可实现“无张力”修补,从而使患者能早日恢复工作且复发率低。为确定最合适的腹腔镜修补方法,我们比较了经腹腹膜前修补术(TAPP)和完全腹膜外修补术(TEP)。对接受TAPP和TEP手术的患者在技术可行性与难度、恢复工作时间及随访情况(包括术中及术后并发症)方面进行了比较。78例患者(108处疝)接受了TAPP手术,67例患者(100处疝)通过TEP进行了修补。所有数据采用Yates校正卡方检验进行定性分析,p≤0.05被视为具有统计学意义。两种手术主要适用于双侧和/或复发性疝(68%)。TAPP的手术时间较短(无统计学意义)。外科医生在进行TEP手术时抱怨技术难度更大(70%的人抱怨TEP手术有难度——4例转为TAPP手术)。住院时间(平均30小时)和恢复工作时间(TAPP为7天,TEP为5.5天)没有差异。关于并发症发生率(TAPP = 20.5%,TEP = 13.5%;无统计学意义),均与气腹技术或其全身影响无关。在TAPP手术中,发生了2例套管针穿刺部位疝,在TEP手术中,发生了1例严重蜂窝织炎,未进行手术干预。每种手术的平均随访期不同,因此复发率在统计学上不可比(TAPP为1.85%,TEP为0)。两种技术都安全且具有相同的优点,但TAPP更容易:能更好地观察解剖结构,缩短学习曲线。我们认为TAPP可以作为一种合适的腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补方法。需要更长时间的随访和更多病例来确定复发率。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验