Department of Medicine and Clinical Science, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Kyushu University, 3-1-1 Maidashi, Higashi-ku, Fukuoka 812-8582, Japan.
J Gastroenterol. 2012 Apr;47(4):387-93. doi: 10.1007/s00535-011-0501-z. Epub 2011 Dec 15.
Selective cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors are less harmful to the small bowel mucosa than non-selective anti-inflammatory drugs. We aimed to compare the severity of small bowel mucosal injury in healthy volunteers induced by two selective COX-2 inhibitors, celecoxib and meloxicam, in a randomized, double-blind trial, using capsule endoscopy (CE).
Twenty-nine healthy subjects were randomized to take either celecoxib (200 mg twice daily) or meloxicam (10 mg once daily) for 2 weeks. The incidence and the number of small bowel mucosal injuries (bleeding, ulcers, and erosions) observed by CE were compared between the two groups.
The overall incidence of small bowel mucosal injury was not different between the celecoxib group (6 of 14 subjects, 42.9%) and the meloxicam group (4 of 15 subjects, 26.7%, P = 0.45). In subjects with positive CE findings, the number of ulcers was greater in the meloxicam group than in the celecoxib group (P = 0.02), while such a trend was not found with regard to erosions (P = 0.52). The distribution of mucosal lesions within the small bowel was similar in the two groups.
Selective COX-2 inhibitors are not completely safe for the small bowel. The mucosal lesions may be less severe with celecoxib than with meloxicam.
选择性环氧化酶(COX)-2 抑制剂对小肠黏膜的危害小于非选择性抗炎药。我们旨在通过胶囊内镜(CE)比较两种选择性 COX-2 抑制剂塞来昔布和美洛昔康在健康志愿者中诱导的小肠黏膜损伤的严重程度,这是一项随机、双盲试验。
29 名健康受试者被随机分为塞来昔布(200mg,每日 2 次)或美洛昔康(10mg,每日 1 次)组,分别服用 2 周。比较两组胶囊内镜观察到的小肠黏膜损伤(出血、溃疡和糜烂)的发生率和数量。
塞来昔布组(14 名受试者中的 6 名,42.9%)和美洛昔康组(15 名受试者中的 4 名,26.7%)小肠黏膜损伤的总体发生率无差异(P=0.45)。在 CE 阳性的受试者中,美洛昔康组的溃疡数量多于塞来昔布组(P=0.02),而在糜烂方面没有这种趋势(P=0.52)。两组小肠黏膜病变的分布相似。
选择性 COX-2 抑制剂对小肠并不完全安全。与美洛昔康相比,塞来昔布引起的黏膜损伤可能较轻。