Suppr超能文献

双相 I 型障碍、双相 II 型障碍和重度抑郁症中“躁狂”症状的概况。

Profiles of "manic" symptoms in bipolar I, bipolar II and major depressive disorders.

作者信息

Serretti Alessandro, Olgiati Paolo

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Vita-Salute University, San Raffaele Institute, Via Stamira D'Ancona 20, 20127 Milan, Italy.

出版信息

J Affect Disord. 2005 Feb;84(2-3):159-66. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2003.09.011.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Classical authors such as Kraepelin, as well as the emerging literature during the past decade, indicate that manic-like signs and symptoms are present to a variable degree in all mood disorders. Current nosography does not differentiate between them and only the number of symptoms or severity is used for classification. This is particularly true for mania and hypomania. This paper will analyze the patterns of manic symptoms in bipolar I (BP-I), bipolar II (BP-II) and major depressive disorders (MDD), to test the hypothesis that mania and hypomania have different profiles, and ascertain which excitatory manic phenomena do occur in unipolar MDD.

METHODS

Six hundred and fifty-two inpatients (158 BP-I, 122 BP-II and 372 MDD) were assessed using the operational criteria for psychotic illness checklist (OPCRIT) [Arch. Gen. Psychiatry 48 (1991) 764] with a lifetime perspective. Manic or hypomanic symptoms were investigated and compared between BP-I, BP-II and MDD.

RESULTS

When compared with BP-II, BP-I disorder had a higher prevalence of reckless activity, distractibility, psychomotor agitation, irritable mood and increased self-esteem. These five symptoms correctly classified 82.8% of BP-I and 80.1% of BP-II patients. One or two manic symptoms were observed in more than 30% of major depressive patients; psychomotor agitation was the most frequent manifestations present in 18% of the MDD group.

LIMITATIONS

We did not control for severity of symptoms, nor for neuroleptic use that could produce akathisia.

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that mania and hypomania can be differentiated in their symptom profiles, and highlights the presence of few manic symptoms, particularly psychomotor agitation, in MDD. From the standpoint of number of manic signs and symptoms, controlling for psychomotor agitation did not substantially change the predictive power of the remaining manic symptoms. Given that excitatory manic signs and symptoms are present to a decreasing degree in BP-I, BP-II and MDD, these disorders can be proposed to lie along a dimensional model. Overall, these data are compatible with the concept of a bipolar spectrum, whereby each of the affective subtypes requires specific genetic factors.

摘要

背景

诸如克雷佩林等经典作家以及过去十年中不断涌现的文献表明,在所有心境障碍中,均不同程度地存在类躁狂症状和体征。当前的疾病分类法并未对它们进行区分,仅依据症状数量或严重程度进行分类。对于躁狂和轻躁狂而言尤其如此。本文将分析双相 I 型障碍(BP-I)、双相 II 型障碍(BP-II)和重度抑郁症(MDD)中躁狂症状的模式,以检验躁狂和轻躁狂具有不同特征的假设,并确定在单相 MDD 中确实会出现哪些兴奋性躁狂现象。

方法

采用精神病性疾病检查表操作标准(OPCRIT)[《美国精神病学杂志》48(1991)764],从终生角度对 652 名住院患者(158 例 BP-I、122 例 BP-II 和 372 例 MDD)进行评估。对 BP-I、BP-II 和 MDD 之间的躁狂或轻躁狂症状进行调查和比较。

结果

与 BP-II 相比,BP-I 障碍中鲁莽行为、注意力分散、精神运动性激越、易激惹情绪和自尊增强的患病率更高。这五种症状正确分类了 82.8%的 BP-I 患者和 80.1%的 BP-II 患者。超过 30%的重度抑郁患者出现一两种躁狂症状;精神运动性激越是 MDD 组中最常见的表现,占 18%。

局限性

我们未对症状严重程度进行控制, 也未对可能导致静坐不能的抗精神病药物使用情况进行控制。

结论

本研究表明,躁狂和轻躁狂在症状特征上可以区分,并突出了 MDD 中存在少数躁狂症状,尤其是精神运动性激越。从躁狂症状数量的角度来看,控制精神运动性激越并未实质性改变其余躁狂症状的预测能力。鉴于兴奋性躁狂症状和体征在 BP-I、BP-II 和 MDD 中出现的程度逐渐降低,可提出这些障碍沿维度模型分布。总体而言,这些数据与双相谱系概念相符,即每种情感亚型都需要特定的遗传因素。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验