• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

双相障碍 1 型和 2 型在多患者家庭中的临床和遗传差异。

Clinical and genetic differences between bipolar disorder type 1 and 2 in multiplex families.

机构信息

Department of Mental Health, University Regional Hospital of Málaga, Institute of Biomedicine of Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain.

Department of Genetic Epidemiology in Psychiatry, Central Institute of Mental Health, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany.

出版信息

Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01146-0.

DOI:10.1038/s41398-020-01146-0
PMID:33431802
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7801527/
Abstract

The two major subtypes of bipolar disorder (BD), BD-I and BD-II, are distinguished based on the presence of manic or hypomanic episodes. Historically, BD-II was perceived as a less severe form of BD-I. Recent research has challenged this concept of a severity continuum. Studies in large samples of unrelated patients have described clinical and genetic differences between the subtypes. Besides an increased schizophrenia polygenic risk load in BD-I, these studies also observed an increased depression risk load in BD-II patients. The present study assessed whether such clinical and genetic differences are also found in BD patients from multiplex families, which exhibit reduced genetic and environmental heterogeneity. Comparing 252 BD-I and 75 BD-II patients from the Andalusian Bipolar Family (ABiF) study, the clinical course, symptoms during depressive and manic episodes, and psychiatric comorbidities were analyzed. Furthermore, polygenic risk scores (PRS) for BD, schizophrenia, and depression were assessed. BD-I patients not only suffered from more severe symptoms during manic episodes but also more frequently showed incapacity during depressive episodes. A higher BD PRS was significantly associated with suicidal ideation. Moreover, BD-I cases exhibited lower depression PRS. In line with a severity continuum from BD-II to BD-I, our results link BD-I to a more pronounced clinical presentation in both mania and depression and indicate that the polygenic risk load of BD predisposes to more severe disorder characteristics. Nevertheless, our results suggest that the genetic risk burden for depression also shapes disorder presentation and increases the likelihood of BD-II subtype development.

摘要

双相情感障碍 (BD) 的两个主要亚型,BD-I 和 BD-II,是基于躁狂或轻躁狂发作的存在来区分的。历史上,BD-II 被认为是 BD-I 较轻的一种形式。最近的研究挑战了这种严重程度连续体的概念。对大量无关联患者样本的研究描述了亚型之间的临床和遗传差异。除了 BD-I 中精神分裂症多基因风险负荷增加外,这些研究还观察到 BD-II 患者的抑郁风险负荷增加。本研究评估了在具有遗传和环境异质性降低的多基因家族性 BD 患者中是否也存在这些临床和遗传差异。在来自安达卢西亚双相情感障碍家族(ABiF)研究的 252 名 BD-I 和 75 名 BD-II 患者中比较了临床病程、抑郁和躁狂发作期间的症状以及精神共病情况。此外,还评估了 BD、精神分裂症和抑郁的多基因风险评分(PRS)。BD-I 患者不仅在躁狂发作期间症状更严重,而且在抑郁发作期间更频繁地出现能力丧失。较高的 BD PRS 与自杀意念显著相关。此外,BD-I 病例的抑郁 PRS 较低。与从 BD-II 到 BD-I 的严重程度连续体一致,我们的结果将 BD-I 与躁狂和抑郁发作中更明显的临床表现联系起来,并表明 BD 的多基因风险负荷导致更严重的疾病特征。然而,我们的结果表明,抑郁的遗传风险负担也会影响疾病表现,并增加 BD-II 亚型发展的可能性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/7801527/a7011d89275b/41398_2020_1146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/7801527/a7011d89275b/41398_2020_1146_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6f91/7801527/a7011d89275b/41398_2020_1146_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Clinical and genetic differences between bipolar disorder type 1 and 2 in multiplex families.双相障碍 1 型和 2 型在多患者家庭中的临床和遗传差异。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Jan 11;11(1):31. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-01146-0.
2
Key subphenotypes of bipolar disorder are differentially associated with polygenic liabilities for bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, and major depressive disorder.双相障碍的主要亚型与双相障碍、精神分裂症和重度抑郁症的多基因风险因素存在不同的关联。
Mol Psychiatry. 2024 Jul;29(7):1941-1950. doi: 10.1038/s41380-024-02448-1. Epub 2024 Feb 14.
3
Bipolar multiplex families have an increased burden of common risk variants for psychiatric disorders.双相情感障碍多重家庭患精神疾病的常见风险变异负担增加。
Mol Psychiatry. 2021 Apr;26(4):1286-1298. doi: 10.1038/s41380-019-0558-2. Epub 2019 Nov 11.
4
Association of schizophrenia polygenic risk score with manic and depressive psychosis in bipolar disorder.精神分裂症多基因风险评分与双相情感障碍中躁狂和抑郁性精神病的关联。
Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Sep 10;8(1):188. doi: 10.1038/s41398-018-0242-3.
5
Contribution of Rare Copy Number Variants to Bipolar Disorder Risk Is Limited to Schizoaffective Cases.罕见拷贝数变异对双相情感障碍风险的贡献仅限于精神分裂情感性病例。
Biol Psychiatry. 2019 Jul 15;86(2):110-119. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.12.009. Epub 2018 Dec 20.
6
Genetic Liabilities Differentiating Bipolar Disorder, Schizophrenia, and Major Depressive Disorder, and Phenotypic Heterogeneity in Bipolar Disorder.遗传易感性区分双相障碍、精神分裂症和重度抑郁症,以及双相障碍的表型异质性。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2022 Oct 1;79(10):1032-1039. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2022.2594.
7
Polygenic risk scores distinguish patients from non-affected adult relatives and from normal controls in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder multi-affected kindreds.在精神分裂症和双相情感障碍多患病家系中,多基因风险评分可区分患者与未患病的成年亲属以及正常对照。
Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet. 2018 Apr;177(3):329-336. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.b.32614. Epub 2017 Nov 28.
8
Association of Polygenic Liabilities for Major Depression, Bipolar Disorder, and Schizophrenia With Risk for Depression in the Danish Population.丹麦人群中重度抑郁症、双相情感障碍和精神分裂症的多基因遗传易感性与抑郁风险的关联。
JAMA Psychiatry. 2019 May 1;76(5):516-525. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2018.4166.
9
Combining schizophrenia and depression polygenic risk scores improves the genetic prediction of lithium response in bipolar disorder patients.将精神分裂症和抑郁症的多基因风险评分相结合,可提高双相情感障碍患者锂反应的遗传预测。
Transl Psychiatry. 2021 Nov 29;11(1):606. doi: 10.1038/s41398-021-01702-2.
10
Genetic risk for psychiatric illness is associated with the number of hospitalizations of bipolar disorder patients.精神疾病的遗传风险与双相情感障碍患者的住院次数有关。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Jan 1;296:532-540. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.09.073. Epub 2021 Sep 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Dissecting causal relationships between cortical morphology and neuropsychiatric disorders: a bidirectional Mendelian randomization study.剖析皮质形态与神经精神疾病之间的因果关系:一项双向孟德尔随机化研究。
Nat Ment Health. 2025 Jun;3(6):613-625. doi: 10.1038/s44220-025-00397-4. Epub 2025 May 19.
2
Polygenic risk scores for severe psychiatric disorders in bipolar disorders: associations with the clinical and dimensional expression, interactions with childhood maltreatment and mediation models.双相情感障碍中严重精神疾病的多基因风险评分:与临床和维度表达的关联、与童年虐待的相互作用以及中介模型
Transl Psychiatry. 2025 Jul 25;15(1):256. doi: 10.1038/s41398-025-03466-5.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Contribution of common and rare damaging variants in familial forms of bipolar disorder and phenotypic outcome.常见和罕见的破坏性变体在双相情感障碍家族形式和表型结果中的贡献。
Transl Psychiatry. 2020 Apr 28;10(1):124. doi: 10.1038/s41398-020-0783-0.
2
Executive functions and memory in bipolar disorders I and II: new insights from meta-analytic results.双相I型和II型障碍中的执行功能与记忆:荟萃分析结果带来的新见解
Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020 Feb;141(2):110-130. doi: 10.1111/acps.13121. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
3
Genome-wide association study identifies 30 loci associated with bipolar disorder.
Epigenetics and Gut Microbiota in the Pathogenesis and Treatment of Bipolar Disorder (BD).
表观遗传学与肠道微生物群在双相情感障碍(BD)发病机制及治疗中的作用
Cells. 2025 Jul 18;14(14):1104. doi: 10.3390/cells14141104.
4
The relationships between impulsivity and mood in bipolar disorder: An ecological momentary assessment study.双相情感障碍中冲动性与情绪的关系:一项生态瞬时评估研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Jul 2;20(7):e0314963. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0314963. eCollection 2025.
5
Neurological Soft Signs in Type I Bipolar Disorder and Bipolar Spectrum Patients and Their Unaffected First-Degree Relatives: A Cross-Sectional Study.I型双相情感障碍及双相谱系患者及其未患病的一级亲属的神经软体征:一项横断面研究。
Health Sci Rep. 2025 Jan 12;8(1):e70341. doi: 10.1002/hsr2.70341. eCollection 2025 Jan.
6
Managing a Complex Case of Bipolar Disorder in a Patient With Recurrent Hospitalizations.管理一名反复住院的双相情感障碍复杂病例患者
Cureus. 2024 Jul 10;16(7):e64271. doi: 10.7759/cureus.64271. eCollection 2024 Jul.
7
White and gray matter alterations in bipolar I and bipolar II disorder subtypes compared with healthy controls - exploring associations with disease course and polygenic risk.双相情感障碍 I 型和 II 型亚型与健康对照组相比的白质和灰质改变——探讨与疾病病程和多基因风险的关联。
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2024 Apr;49(5):814-823. doi: 10.1038/s41386-024-01812-7. Epub 2024 Feb 8.
8
Impulsivity, decision-making, and risk behavior in bipolar disorder and major depression from bipolar multiplex families.双相情感障碍和重度抑郁症患者冲动性、决策能力及风险行为的研究:来自双相情感障碍多重家庭的观察
Brain Behav. 2023 Dec 18;14(2):e3337. doi: 10.1002/brb3.3337.
9
Polygenic Risk Scores for Bipolar Disorder: Progress and Perspectives.双相情感障碍的多基因风险评分:进展与展望
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2023 Nov 29;19:2617-2626. doi: 10.2147/NDT.S433023. eCollection 2023.
10
A characteristic cerebellar biosignature for bipolar disorder, identified with fully automatic machine learning.通过全自动机器学习识别出的双相情感障碍的一种特征性小脑生物特征。
IBRO Neurosci Rep. 2023 Jul 1;15:77-89. doi: 10.1016/j.ibneur.2023.06.008. eCollection 2023 Dec.
全基因组关联研究确定了 30 个与双相情感障碍相关的位点。
Nat Genet. 2019 May;51(5):793-803. doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0397-8. Epub 2019 May 1.
4
Genome-wide meta-analysis of depression identifies 102 independent variants and highlights the importance of the prefrontal brain regions.全基因组荟萃分析抑郁症鉴定出 102 个独立变异,并强调了前额叶脑区的重要性。
Nat Neurosci. 2019 Mar;22(3):343-352. doi: 10.1038/s41593-018-0326-7. Epub 2019 Feb 4.
5
Comparative familial aggregation of bipolar disorder in patients with bipolar I and bipolar II disorders.
Australas Psychiatry. 2018 Aug;26(4):414-416. doi: 10.1177/1039856218772249. Epub 2018 May 8.
6
Specificity in Etiology of Subtypes of Bipolar Disorder: Evidence From a Swedish Population-Based Family Study.双相障碍亚型病因学的特异性:来自瑞典基于人群的家族研究的证据。
Biol Psychiatry. 2018 Dec 1;84(11):810-816. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2017.11.014. Epub 2017 Nov 20.
7
Socio-demographic and clinical characterization of patients with Bipolar Disorder I vs II: a Nationwide Italian Study.双相情感障碍 I 型与 II 型患者的社会人口学和临床特征:一项全国性意大利研究。
Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. 2018 Mar;268(2):169-177. doi: 10.1007/s00406-017-0791-0. Epub 2017 Apr 1.
8
Differences in clinical presentation between bipolar I and II disorders in the early stages of bipolar disorder: A naturalistic study.双相情感障碍早期阶段双相 I 型和 II 型障碍临床表现的差异:一项自然主义研究。
J Affect Disord. 2017 Jan 15;208:521-527. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.10.031. Epub 2016 Oct 25.
9
Control for Population Structure and Relatedness for Binary Traits in Genetic Association Studies via Logistic Mixed Models.通过逻辑混合模型在遗传关联研究中对二元性状的群体结构和相关性进行控制。
Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr 7;98(4):653-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 24.
10
Different characteristics associated with suicide attempts among bipolar I versus bipolar II disorder patients.双相I型障碍与双相II型障碍患者自杀未遂相关的不同特征。
J Psychiatr Res. 2016 May;76:94-100. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 15.