Leong-Poi Howard, Coggins Matthew P, Sklenar Jiri, Jayaweera Ananda R, Wang Xin-Qun, Kaul Sanjiv
Cardiovascular Imaging Center, Cardiovascular Division, University of Virginia, Charlottesville 22908-0158, USA.
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005 Feb 15;45(4):565-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2004.11.032.
The aim of this study was to test the hypothesis that the apparent disparity between the circumferential extent of abnormal wall thickening (WT) and that of infarct size (IS) at rest or size of ischemic zone (IZ) during demand ischemia (DI) is principally due to the effects of collateral blood flow (CollBF).
A disparity has been reported between the circumferential extent of abnormal WT and that of IS at rest or IZ size during DI.
Wall thickening and CollBF were measured in 18 dogs: at 6 h after coronary occlusion (Group 1, n = 6), and during 40 microg x kg x min(-1) of dobutamine in the presence of either one-vessel (Group 2, n = 6) or two-vessel stenosis (Group 3, n = 6).
The apparent overestimation of the IS by the circumferential extent of abnormal WT was due to intermediate levels of CollBF in border zones within the risk area that had escaped necrosis. Although reduced, WT in these regions was commensurate with the level of flow. Similarly, during DI, regions within the IZ exhibiting the worst WT in Group 2 and 3 dogs were those not supplied by CollBF. The regions supplied by CollBF had intermediate WT, which was also commensurate with the level of flow. Only in two Group 3 dogs was tethering seen in small, normally perfused regions that were interspersed between two large IZ. Excluding these few tethered regions, data from different myocardial regions (infarcted, ischemic, CollBF dependent, and normal) were described by a single relation: y = 57(1 - e([-0.72(x - 0.06)])) (r = 0.80, p < 0.001).
Myocardial regions at the margins of ischemic territories contribute to the apparent disparity between the circumferential extent of abnormal WT and IS or IZ during DI. In most circumstances, these regions are supplied by collaterals and their WT is commensurate with the degree of myocardial blood flow. The apparent disparity between the circumferential extent of WT and ischemia is rarely due to myocardial tethering, which is seen only in some instances of multi-vessel disease where a small normal region is interspersed between two large IZs.
本研究旨在验证以下假设,即静息时异常心肌壁增厚(WT)的圆周范围与梗死面积(IS)之间,或负荷性心肌缺血(DI)期间缺血区(IZ)大小之间明显的差异,主要是由于侧支血流(CollBF)的影响。
已有报道称,静息时异常WT的圆周范围与IS之间,或DI期间与IZ大小之间存在差异。
对18只犬测量心肌壁增厚和CollBF:在冠状动脉闭塞后6小时(第1组,n = 6),以及在给予40μg·kg·min⁻¹多巴酚丁胺期间,分别处于单支血管狭窄(第2组,n = 6)或双支血管狭窄(第3组,n = 6)的情况下。
异常WT的圆周范围对IS的明显高估,是由于风险区内边缘区域存在中等水平的CollBF,这些区域未发生坏死。虽然这些区域的WT有所降低,但与血流水平相称。同样,在DI期间,第2组和第3组犬中IZ内WT最差的区域是那些没有CollBF供血的区域。有CollBF供血的区域WT中等,这也与血流水平相称。仅在第3组的两只犬中,在两个大IZ之间散布的小的正常灌注区域中观察到了心肌牵拉现象。排除这少数几个有牵拉的区域后,来自不同心肌区域(梗死、缺血、CollBF依赖和正常)的数据可用单一关系描述:y = 57(1 - e([-0.72(x - 0.06)])) (r = 0.80,p < 0.001)。
缺血区域边缘的心肌区域导致了DI期间异常WT的圆周范围与IS或IZ之间明显的差异。在大多数情况下,这些区域由侧支供血,其WT与心肌血流程度相称。WT的圆周范围与缺血之间明显的差异很少是由于心肌牵拉,仅在某些多支血管病变的情况下可见,即两个大IZ之间散布着小的正常区域。