Glimcher Paul W
Center for Neural Science, New York University, New York, NY 10003, USA.
Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:25-56. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.141429.
The central goal of modern science that evolved during the Enlightenment was the empirical reduction of uncertainty by experimental inquiry. Although there have been challenges to this view in the physical sciences, where profoundly indeterminate events have been identified at the quantum level, the presumption that physical phenomena are fundamentally determinate seems to have defined modern behavioral science. Programs like those of the classical behaviorists, for example, were explicitly anchored to a fully deterministic worldview, and this anchoring clearly influenced the experiments that those scientists chose to perform. Recent advances in the psychological, social, and neural sciences, however, have caused a number of scholars to begin to question the assumption that all of behavior can be regarded as fundamentally deterministic in character. Although it is not yet clear whether the generative mechanisms for human and animal behavior will require a philosophically indeterminate approach, it is clear that behavioral scientists of all kinds are beginning to engage the issues of indeterminacy that plagued physics at the beginning of the twentieth century.
启蒙运动时期发展起来的现代科学的核心目标,是通过实验探究从经验上减少不确定性。尽管在物理科学领域有人对这一观点提出了挑战,在量子层面已发现了具有深刻不确定性的事件,但物理现象在根本上是确定的这一假定似乎已界定了现代行为科学。例如,像经典行为主义者的那些研究项目就明确基于一种完全决定论的世界观,而这种依托显然影响了那些科学家所选择进行的实验。然而,心理学、社会科学和神经科学的最新进展已促使一些学者开始质疑这样一种假设,即所有行为在本质上都可被视为根本是决定论的。虽然目前尚不清楚人类和动物行为的生成机制是否将需要一种哲学上的非决定论方法,但很明显,各类行为科学家都开始关注在20世纪初困扰物理学的不确定性问题。