Doughty Michael J, Jalota Vinati, Bennett Emma, Naase Taher, Oblak Emil
Department of Vision Sciences, Glasgow-Caledonian University, Glasgow G4 OBA, UK.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Mar;25(2):119-27. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00261.x.
To assess whether fluorexon strips could be used in tear stability [tear film break-up time (TBUT)] measures, as compared with fluorescein strips.
The pre-ocular tear film stability was assessed in 40 adults (19-29 years of age), half of whom were adapted soft contact lens wearers, using the dye-assisted tear film break-up time (TBUT) method. The measures were carried out between 10.00 and 17.00 hours, with contact lens wearers removing their lenses just before the assessments. For all subjects, fluorescein or fluorexon ophthalmic strips (pre-wetted with preservative-free saline) were used to add dye to the tear film, the TBUT was assessed three times and then the eye lightly irrigated with saline. The measures were repeated 45 min later with the other dye, with half the subjects receiving fluorescein first and the other half receiving fluorexon first.
Overall, the mean TBUT times were 12.2 +/- 5.9 s for fluorescein and 12.6 +/- 5.6 s for fluorexon (p = n.s.), but the non-lens wearers had longer TBUT times (14.6 and 14.5 s for the two dyes) compared with contact lens wearers (9.8 and 10.7 s, p < 0.01). While the inter-subject variability (as S.D.) was larger for non-contact lens wearers, the intra-subject variability [as coefficient of variation (COV)] was greater in the contact lens wearers when fluorescein was used (p < 0.001). When analysed as a function of the time of day that the measures were made, there were clear trends for both the fluorescein and fluorexon. TBUT values to increase in non-contact lens wearers and decrease in contact lens wearers. These trends failed to reach statistical significance, but the results with the contact lens wearers showed less variation than the non-contact lens wearers.
The use of a fluorexon dye-impregnated strip (pre-wetted with preservative-free saline) yielded comparable results with a fluorescein strip for assessments of tear film stability based on TBUT. The studies also indicate that further research is needed on changes in TBUT values during the day.
与荧光素试纸相比,评估荧光黄试纸是否可用于泪液稳定性[泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)]测量。
采用染料辅助泪膜破裂时间(TBUT)法,对40名成年人(19 - 29岁)进行眼前泪膜稳定性评估,其中一半为软性隐形眼镜佩戴者。测量在10:00至17:00之间进行,隐形眼镜佩戴者在评估前摘下镜片。对于所有受试者,使用荧光素或荧光黄眼科试纸(预先用无防腐剂生理盐水湿润)向泪膜中添加染料,对TBUT进行三次评估,然后用生理盐水轻轻冲洗眼睛。45分钟后用另一种染料重复测量,一半受试者先接受荧光素,另一半先接受荧光黄。
总体而言,荧光素的平均TBUT时间为12.2±5.9秒,荧光黄为12.6±5.6秒(p =无统计学意义),但与隐形眼镜佩戴者(9.8和10.7秒,p < 0.01)相比,非隐形眼镜佩戴者的TBUT时间更长(两种染料分别为14.6和14.5秒)。虽然非隐形眼镜佩戴者的受试者间变异性(以标准差表示)更大,但使用荧光素时,隐形眼镜佩戴者的受试者内变异性[以变异系数(COV)表示]更大(p < 0.001)。当作为测量时间的函数进行分析时,荧光素和荧光黄都有明显趋势。非隐形眼镜佩戴者的TBUT值增加,隐形眼镜佩戴者的TBUT值降低。这些趋势未达到统计学意义,但隐形眼镜佩戴者的结果变化小于非隐形眼镜佩戴者。
使用预先用无防腐剂生理盐水湿润的含荧光黄染料试纸,在基于TBUT评估泪膜稳定性方面,与荧光素试纸产生的结果相当。研究还表明,需要进一步研究一天中TBUT值的变化。