Langelaan Maaike, Wouters Bill, Moll Annette C, de Boer Michiel R, vans Rens Ger H M B
Department of Ophthalmology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Ophthalmic Physiol Opt. 2005 Mar;25(2):136-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00266.x.
In 2001, the American Medical Association adopted the Functional Vision Score (FVS). It is built on Functional Acuity Scores (FAS) and Functional Field Scores (FFS). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intra- and interrater reproducibility of the FFS. The study sample was composed of 62 persons, mean age 41.8 years, from the population of patients who visited a rehabilitation centre for visually impaired adults. We analysed 30 FFSs of isopter III-4e and 58 of isopter V-4e. Two raters independently scored the plots. The smallest detectable difference (SDD) and the weighted kappa quantified agreement. The SDDs were smaller than the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 10 points. Thus, the MCID can be distinguished from measurement error. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) quantified reliability. The intra- and inter ICCs were high (ICCs > 0.98). We concluded that both intra- and interrater reliability of the FFS were excellent.
2001年,美国医学协会采用了功能性视力评分(FVS)。它基于功能性视力敏锐度评分(FAS)和功能性视野评分(FFS)构建。本研究的目的是评估FFS的评分者内和评分者间的可重复性。研究样本由62名平均年龄41.8岁的人组成,他们来自前往成人视力障碍康复中心就诊的患者群体。我们分析了30个III - 4e等视线的FFS和58个V - 4e等视线的FFS。两名评分者独立对图表进行评分。最小可检测差异(SDD)和加权kappa用于量化一致性。SDD小于10分的最小临床重要差异(MCID)。因此,MCID可以与测量误差区分开来。组内相关系数(ICC)用于量化可靠性。评分者内和评分者间的ICC都很高(ICC > 0.98)。我们得出结论,FFS的评分者内和评分者间可靠性都非常好。