Montenero Annibale S, Bruno Nicola, Zumbo Francesco, Antonelli Andrea, Fiocca Luigi, Barbieri Luca, De Bernardi Francesca, Andrew Peter, Affinito Vincenzo
Cardiology Department and Arrhythmia Center of Policlinico MultiMedica, Sesto S. Giovanni, Milan, Italy.
J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2005 Jan;12(1):45-54. doi: 10.1007/s10840-005-5840-3.
Cardiac cryoablation has been used to successfully treat a variety of arrhythmias.
This study documents our experience with a new 9 French (FR) 8 mm cryocatheter for ablation treatment of symptomatic atrial flutter.
A total of 77 consecutive patients with symptomatic atrial flutter were treated. Electrophysiological studies (EPS) were performed with diagnostic catheters and ablation was performed with a 9FR, 8 mm tip, quadripolar cryocatheter (Freezor MAX catheter, CryoCath Technologies Inc., Kirkland, Canada). Cryoablation at -75 degrees C for 8 minutes was performed, beginning at the inferior rim of the coronary sinus (CS) os and creating a posterior line to the Eustachian ridge. Safety, bidirectional isthmus block at intervention, and recurrence at 3 months post procedure were assessed.
There were no adverse events reported. All patients remained free of discomfort on cryoenergy delivery. The acute success rate at intervention was 96% for all patients and 100% for those with common atrial flutter. Follow-up data from 47 patients showed 33 (70%) patients without conduction recurrence on repeat EPS at 3 months. Although, 1 (2%) patient had both symptom and conduction recurrence. Data available from 53 acutely successful patients at 6 month clinical follow-up showed that 48 (91%) patients were asymptomatic and 5 (9%) patients had recurrence documented by ECG and/or patient diary records.
Our experience with a new 9FR, 8 mm tip, quadripolar cryocatheter yielded a high success rate at intervention and an excellent safety profile. Although repeat EPS at 3 months post ablation identified conduction recurrence in 30% of patients, at 6 month clinical follow-up only 9% of patients had recurrence. Further monitoring is necessary to assess whether the relatively low recurrence rate observed at 6 month clinical follow-up is maintained over the long term.