Suppr超能文献

用电磁流量计和指示剂稀释法测量肝血流量时氙-133清除率的比较。

A comparison of xenon-133 clearance with electromagnetic flowmeters and an indicator dilution method for the measurement of liver blood flow.

作者信息

Thorne J, Bennett R, Shields R, Johnson J, Taylor I

出版信息

Br J Surg. 1979 Jun;66(6):385-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800660604.

Abstract

Measurement of liver blood flow has been carried out by three different methods in 14 dogs to assess the accuracy of xenon-133 clearance following portal vein injection. Electromagnetic flowmetry with flow probes on the hepatic artery and portal vein resulted in a mean value of 121.9 +/- 39.3 ml min-1 100 g-1. An indicator dilution study utilizing chromium-51-labelled red cells gave a mean value of 119.4 +/- 31.4 ml min-1 100 g-1 and the xenon-133 clearance following portal vein injection, 120.3 +/- 33.8 ml min-1 100 g-1. One-way analysis of variance showed no statistically significant variation between these three groups. There was a close correlation between xenon-133 clearance and electromagnetic flowmetry and between xenon-133 clearance and the indicator dilution technique. These data suggest that xenon-133 clearance following portal vein injection gives an accurate assessment of liver blood flow and this technique (as well as direct parenchymal injection) can be adapted for clinical use.

摘要

在14只狗身上采用三种不同方法测量肝血流量,以评估门静脉注射后氙-133清除率的准确性。在肝动脉和门静脉上使用流量探头进行电磁血流测量,得出的平均值为121.9±39.3毫升·分钟⁻¹·100克⁻¹。利用铬-51标记红细胞进行的指示剂稀释研究得出的平均值为119.4±31.4毫升·分钟⁻¹·100克⁻¹,门静脉注射后的氙-133清除率为120.3±33.8毫升·分钟⁻¹·100克⁻¹。单因素方差分析显示这三组之间无统计学显著差异。氙-133清除率与电磁血流测量之间以及氙-133清除率与指示剂稀释技术之间存在密切相关性。这些数据表明门静脉注射后的氙-133清除率能准确评估肝血流量,且该技术(以及直接实质内注射)可适用于临床。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验