Shanahan M D, Doran C M, Digiusto E, Bell J, Lintzeris N, White J, Ali R, Saunders J B, Mattick R P, Gilmour S
National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre (NDARC), University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW 2052, Australia.
Addict Behav. 2006 Mar;31(3):371-87. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2005.05.016. Epub 2005 Jun 21.
This economic evaluation was part of the Australian National Evaluation of Pharmacotherapies for Opioid Dependence (NEPOD) project. Data from four trials of heroin detoxification methods, involving 365 participants, were pooled to enable a comprehensive comparison of the cost-effectiveness of five inpatient and outpatient detoxification methods. This study took the perspective of the treatment provider in assessing resource use and costs. Two short-term outcome measures were used-achievement of an initial 7-day period of abstinence, and entry into ongoing post-detoxification treatment. The mean costs of the various detoxification methods ranged widely, from AUD 491 dollars(buprenorphine-based outpatient); to AUD 605 dollars for conventional outpatient; AUD 1404 dollars for conventional inpatient; AUD 1990 dollars for rapid detoxification under sedation; and to AUD 2689 dollars for anaesthesia per episode. An incremental cost-effectiveness analysis was carried out using conventional outpatient detoxification as the base comparator. The buprenorphine-based outpatient detoxification method was found to be the most cost-effective method overall, and rapid opioid detoxification under sedation was the most cost-effective inpatient method.
这项经济评估是澳大利亚阿片类药物依赖药物治疗国家评估(NEPOD)项目的一部分。汇集了四项涉及365名参与者的海洛因戒毒方法试验的数据,以便全面比较五种住院和门诊戒毒方法的成本效益。本研究从治疗提供者的角度评估资源使用和成本。使用了两项短期结果指标——实现最初7天的禁欲期,以及进入持续的戒毒后治疗。各种戒毒方法的平均成本差异很大,从基于丁丙诺啡的门诊治疗的491澳元到传统门诊治疗的605澳元;传统住院治疗的1404澳元;镇静下快速戒毒的1990澳元;以及每次发作麻醉治疗的2689澳元。以传统门诊戒毒作为基础对照进行了增量成本效益分析。结果发现,基于丁丙诺啡的门诊戒毒方法总体上是最具成本效益的方法,而镇静下快速阿片类药物戒毒是最具成本效益的住院治疗方法。