Laimgruber Kerstin, Goldenberg Georg, Hermsdörfer Joachim
Clinical Neuropsychology Research Group (EKN), Neuropsychological Department, München-Bogenhausen Hospital, Dachauerstrasse 164, D-80992 Munich, Germany.
Neuropsychologia. 2005;43(5):682-92. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.004.
Impairments of the ipsilesional hand after brain damage have been reported in goal-directed motor acts and in pantomimes; the relationship between both movement conditions is largely unknown. In the presented study, pantomimed and actual prehension was examined in 29 stroke patients with left brain damage (LBD) or right brain damage (RBD) as well as in 21 control subjects. Kinematic analyses revealed various performance differences between the conditions of movement execution and the subject groups. The differences depended on the hand tested and on the side of the brain lesion. During actual prehension deviations from normal performance were obvious in the peak velocity of the transport component of the movement, which was reduced in RBD patients, and in the duration of the final adjustment phase, which was prolonged in both patient groups. Pantomime changed various features of movement execution. The transport component was particularly altered in the groups performing with the right hand. Hand aperture was significantly smaller during pantomime than during actual movement execution in all groups. However, this effect was particularly obvious in LBD patients, in whom the hand aperture was even completely absent during many of their pantomimes. Actual movement execution immediately preceding the pantomimes did not change the characteristic features of pantomimes. Thus, the cerebral processes for actually executed and pantomimed motor acts differ. Actual movements seem to be governed by external affordances and constraints; whereas, pantomimes may represent a symbolic act. During prehension, differences in grip formation reveal most directly this dichotomy. We argue that the left hemisphere plays a special role in the generation of the symbolic act; a lesion may abolish grip formation and causes the clinical symptom of apraxia.
脑损伤后患侧手在目标导向性运动行为和模仿动作中均出现了功能障碍;而这两种运动条件之间的关系在很大程度上尚不清楚。在本研究中,对29例左侧脑损伤(LBD)或右侧脑损伤(RBD)的中风患者以及21名对照受试者进行了模仿动作和实际抓握动作的测试。运动学分析揭示了运动执行条件和受试者组之间存在各种表现差异。这些差异取决于所测试的手以及脑损伤的部位。在实际抓握过程中,运动的运输部分峰值速度偏离正常表现,这在RBD患者中降低,而在最终调整阶段的持续时间方面,两组患者均延长。模仿动作改变了运动执行的各种特征。在使用右手进行动作的组中,运输部分尤其受到影响。在所有组中,模仿动作时的手张开度明显小于实际运动执行时。然而,这种影响在LBD患者中尤为明显,在他们的许多模仿动作中,手张开度甚至完全消失。紧接在模仿动作之前的实际运动执行并没有改变模仿动作的特征。因此,实际执行的运动行为和模仿的运动行为的大脑过程是不同的。实际运动似乎受外部可供性和限制因素的支配;而模仿动作可能代表一种象征性动作。在抓握过程中,握力形成的差异最直接地揭示了这种二分法。我们认为,左半球在象征性动作的产生中起着特殊作用;损伤可能会消除握力形成并导致失用症的临床症状。