Hermsdörfer J, Terlinden G, Mühlau M, Goldenberg G, Wohlschläger A M
Clinical Neuropsychology Research Group (EKN), Technical University Munich, Germany.
Neuroimage. 2007;36 Suppl 2:T109-18. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.03.037. Epub 2007 Mar 31.
Pantomime of tool use is a highly sensitive test to detect apraxia. The relationship to real-life performance is however unclear since apraxic patients frequently improve substantially when allowed to actually use tools. In the present study, the neural correlates of pantomimed and actual tool use were directly compared in healthy subjects using an event-related functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) paradigm. Subjects were requested to demonstrate the use of various tools either as pantomimes or with the tool in hand. Movement and pre-movement events were evaluated. The comparison of all conditions versus rest revealed a widespread activation including parietal, posterior temporal, frontal, and subcortical areas with some characteristic activation for the different events. The direct comparison between pantomime and actual use conditions revealed no or only minor differential activations for pre-movement events. During the movement event, actual tool use induced the expected additional activation in sensory and motor areas, but also representations presumably related to tool-use knowledge at parietal, posterior temporal, and frontal sites. The opposite contrast of pantomimed versus actual tool use revealed differential activation only in the left intraparietal sulcus in a corresponding region-of-interest analysis. We conclude that planning and preparing of either pantomimed or actual tool use share large parts of a common network. Characteristic differences in the kinematics and dynamics of both movement conditions may be defined just before or during the initiation of the movement when sensory cues about the tool and environment are available in the actual use condition. Sensory and cognitive cues may provide apraxic patients the capacity to evoke a correct action program despite impaired pantomime.
工具使用的模仿动作是检测失用症的一项高度敏感的测试。然而,由于失用症患者在实际允许使用工具时常常有显著改善,所以其与现实生活表现之间的关系尚不清楚。在本研究中,我们使用事件相关功能磁共振成像(fMRI)范式,在健康受试者中直接比较了工具使用模仿动作和实际工具使用的神经关联。要求受试者以模仿动作或手持工具的方式演示各种工具的使用。对动作和动作前事件进行了评估。将所有条件与静息状态进行比较,发现广泛的激活,包括顶叶、颞叶后部、额叶和皮质下区域,不同事件有一些特征性激活。模仿动作和实际使用条件之间的直接比较显示,动作前事件没有或只有轻微的差异激活。在动作事件期间,实际工具使用在感觉和运动区域诱发了预期的额外激活,同时在顶叶、颞叶后部和额叶部位也有大概与工具使用知识相关的表征。模仿动作与实际工具使用的相反对比在相应的感兴趣区域分析中仅显示左侧顶内沟有差异激活。我们得出结论,模仿动作或实际工具使用的计划和准备共享一个共同网络的大部分。当实际使用条件下有关于工具和环境的感觉线索时,两种动作条件在运动学和动力学上的特征差异可能在动作开始前或开始期间就已确定。感觉和认知线索可能使失用症患者尽管模仿动作受损仍能唤起正确的动作程序。