Moss Rehabilitation Research Institute, Elkins Park, PA, USA.
University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Cortex. 2019 Jun;115:184-200. doi: 10.1016/j.cortex.2019.01.032. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
The mechanisms and brain regions underlying error monitoring in complex action are poorly understood, yet errors and impaired error correction in these tasks are hallmarks of apraxia, a common disorder associated with left hemisphere stroke. Accounts of monitoring of language posit an internal route by which production planning or competition between candidate representations provide predictive signals that monitoring is required to prevent error, and an external route in which output is monitored using the comprehension system. Abnormal reliance on the external route has been associated with damage to brain regions critical for sensory-motor transformation and a pattern of gradual error 'clean-up' called conduite d'approche (CD). Action pantomime data from 67 participants with left hemisphere stroke were consistent with versions of internal route theories positing that competition signals monitoring requirements. Support Vector Regression Lesion Symptom Mapping (SVR-LSM) showed that lesions in the inferior parietal, posterior temporal, and arcuate fasciculus/superior longitudinal fasciculus predicted action conduite d'approche, overlapping the regions previously observed in the language domain. A second experiment with 12 patients who produced substantial action CD assessed whether factors impacting the internal route (action production ability, competition) versus external route (vision of produced actions, action comprehension) influenced correction attempts. In these 'high CD' patients, vision of produced actions and integrity of gesture comprehension interacted to determine successful error correction, supporting external route theories. Viewed together, these and other data suggest that skilled actions are monitored both by an internal route in which conflict aids in detection and correction of errors during production planning, and an external route that detects mismatches between produced actions and stored knowledge of action appearance. The parallels between language and action monitoring mechanisms and neuroanatomical networks pave the way for further exploration of common and distinct processes across these domains.
在复杂动作中,错误监控的机制和大脑区域尚未被充分理解,然而,在这些任务中出现错误和错误纠正能力受损是失用症的标志,失用症是一种与左半球中风相关的常见障碍。对语言监控的解释提出了一种内部途径,即通过产生计划或候选表示之间的竞争提供预测信号,需要监控以防止错误,以及一种外部途径,其中使用理解系统监控输出。异常依赖外部途径与对感觉运动转换至关重要的大脑区域的损伤以及一种称为接近通路(CD)的逐渐错误“清理”模式有关。来自 67 名左半球中风患者的动作哑剧数据与内部途径理论的版本一致,这些理论假设竞争信号监控要求。支持向量回归损伤症状映射(SVR-LSM)显示,顶下小叶、后颞叶和弓状束/上纵束的损伤预测了动作接近通路,与语言领域中先前观察到的区域重叠。第二项涉及 12 名产生大量动作 CD 的患者的实验评估了影响内部途径(动作产生能力、竞争)与外部途径(产生动作的视觉、动作理解)的因素是否会影响纠正尝试。在这些“高 CD”患者中,产生的动作的视觉和手势理解的完整性相互作用以确定成功的错误纠正,支持外部途径理论。综合来看,这些和其他数据表明,熟练的动作既可以通过内部途径进行监控,在产生计划过程中,冲突有助于检测和纠正错误,也可以通过外部途径进行监控,该途径检测产生的动作与动作外观存储知识之间的不匹配。语言和动作监控机制以及神经解剖网络之间的相似之处为进一步探索这些领域中的共同和独特过程铺平了道路。