Rubin David C, Schrauf Robert W, Greenberg Daniel L
Psychological and Brain Sciences, Duke University, Box 90086, Durham NC 27707-0086, USA.
Memory. 2004 Nov;12(6):715-21. doi: 10.1080/09658210344000512.
A total of 30 undergraduates recalled the same 20 autobiographical memories at two sessions separated by 2 weeks. At each session they dated their memories and rated them on 18 properties commonly studied in autobiographical memory experiments. Individuals showed moderate stability in their ratings on the 18 scales (r approximately .5), with consistency of dating being much higher (r = .96). There was more stability in the individuals' average rating on each scale (r approximately .8), even when the averages were calculated on different memories in the different sessions. The results are consistent with a constructive view of autobiographical memory, in which stable individual differences in cognitive style are important.
共有30名本科生在相隔两周的两次实验中回忆了相同的20段自传式记忆。在每次实验中,他们标注了这些记忆的日期,并根据自传式记忆实验中常用的18个属性对其进行评分。个体在18个量表上的评分显示出中等程度的稳定性(r约为0.5),日期标注的一致性则高得多(r = 0.96)。即使是在不同实验中对不同记忆计算平均值,个体在每个量表上的平均评分也具有更高的稳定性(r约为0.8)。这些结果与自传式记忆的建构性观点一致,即认知风格中稳定的个体差异很重要。