• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国EQ-5D健康状态的估值:D1估值模型的开发与测试

US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.

作者信息

Shaw James W, Johnson Jeffrey A, Coons Stephen Joel

机构信息

Tobacco Control Research Branch, Behavioral Research Program, Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.

出版信息

Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003
PMID:15725977
Abstract

PURPOSE

The EQ-5D is a brief, multiattribute, preference-based health status measure. This article describes the development of a statistical model for generating US population-based EQ-5D preference weights.

METHODS

A multistage probability sample was selected from the US adult civilian noninstitutional population. Respondents valued 13 of 243 EQ-5D health states using the time trade-off (TTO) method. Data for 12 states were used in econometric modeling. The TTO valuations were linearly transformed to lie on the interval [-1, 1]. Methods were investigated to account for interaction effects caused by having problems in multiple EQ-5D dimensions. Several alternative model specifications (eg, pooled least squares, random effects) also were considered. A modified split-sample approach was used to evaluate the predictive accuracy of the models. All statistical analyses took into account the clustering and disproportionate selection probabilities inherent in our sampling design.

RESULTS

Our D1 model for the EQ-5D included ordinal terms to capture the effect of departures from perfect health as well as interaction effects. A random effects specification of the D1 model yielded a good fit for the observed TTO data, with an overall R of 0.38, a mean absolute error of 0.025, and 7 prediction errors exceeding 0.05 in absolute magnitude.

CONCLUSIONS

The D1 model best predicts the values for observed health states. The resulting preference weight estimates represent a significant enhancement of the EQ-5D's utility for health status assessment and economic analysis in the US.

摘要

目的

EQ-5D是一种简短的、多属性的、基于偏好的健康状况测量工具。本文描述了一种用于生成基于美国人群的EQ-5D偏好权重的统计模型的开发过程。

方法

从美国成年非机构化平民人口中选取了一个多阶段概率样本。受访者使用时间权衡(TTO)方法对243种EQ-5D健康状态中的13种进行了估值。12种状态的数据用于计量经济学建模。TTO估值经过线性变换后落在区间[-1, 1]内。研究了考虑EQ-5D多个维度出现问题所引起的交互作用的方法。还考虑了几种替代模型规格(例如,混合最小二乘法、随机效应)。采用改进的拆分样本方法评估模型的预测准确性。所有统计分析都考虑了我们抽样设计中固有的聚类和不均衡选择概率。

结果

我们的EQ-5D D1模型包括序数项以捕捉偏离完美健康的影响以及交互作用。D1模型的随机效应规格对观察到的TTO数据拟合良好,总体R值为0.38,平均绝对误差为0.025,绝对幅度超过0.05的预测误差有7个。

结论

D1模型最能预测观察到的健康状态的值。由此得到的偏好权重估计值显著提高了EQ-5D在美国健康状况评估和经济分析中的效用。

相似文献

1
US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.美国EQ-5D健康状态的估值:D1估值模型的开发与测试
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003.
2
Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?EQ-5D健康状态的估值:美国和英国有所不同吗?
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004.
3
Chinese time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states.中国人群 EQ-5D 量表健康状态时间权衡值。
Value Health. 2014 Jul;17(5):597-604. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.05.007. Epub 2014 Jul 23.
4
Experience-Based Swedish TTO and VAS Value Sets for EQ-5D-5L Health States.基于经验的瑞典 TTO 和 EQ-5D-5L 健康状态下的 VAS 值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2020 Aug;38(8):839-856. doi: 10.1007/s40273-020-00905-7.
5
A median model for predicting United States population-based EQ-5D health state preferences.预测美国人群基于 EQ-5D 的健康状态偏好的中位数模型。
Value Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;13(2):278-88. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00675.x. Epub 2009 Dec 4.
6
South Korean time trade-off values for EQ-5D health states: modeling with observed values for 101 health states.韩国时间权衡值对 EQ-5D 健康状态的评估:对 101 个健康状态的观察值进行建模。
Value Health. 2009 Nov-Dec;12(8):1187-93. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00579.x. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
7
Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.EQ-5D-5L健康状态的时间权衡估值的决定因素:来自加拿大EQ-5D-5L估值研究的数据。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1679-85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1203-4. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
8
Estimating quality weights for EQ-5D (EuroQol-5 dimensions) health states with the time trade-off method in Taiwan.采用时间权衡法评估台湾 EQ-5D(欧洲五维健康量表)健康状态的质量权重。
J Formos Med Assoc. 2013 Nov;112(11):699-706. doi: 10.1016/j.jfma.2012.12.015. Epub 2013 Feb 12.
9
Estimating an EQ-5D value set for Malaysia using time trade-off and visual analogue scale methods.采用时间权衡法和视觉模拟评分法对马来西亚进行 EQ-5D 效用值评估。
Value Health. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1 Suppl):S85-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2011.11.024.
10
Valuation of Quality Weights for EuroQol 5-Dimensional Health States With the Time Trade-Off Method in the Capital of Iran.在伊朗首都采用时间权衡法对欧洲五维健康量表健康状态的质量权重进行评估。
Value Health Reg Issues. 2019 May;18:170-175. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2019.01.007. Epub 2019 May 13.

引用本文的文献

1
Do generic population utility scores accurately represent real-world experienced health?通用人群效用评分能否准确代表现实世界中经历的健康状况?
Qual Life Res. 2025 Sep 10. doi: 10.1007/s11136-025-04060-4.
2
Patient and Physician Preferences for Maintenance Treatment in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Insights into Treatment Selection.晚期非小细胞肺癌维持治疗中患者与医生的偏好:对治疗选择的见解
Adv Ther. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s12325-025-03347-9.
3
Cost-effectiveness of spinal manipulation, exercise, and self-management for spinal pain.
脊柱推拿、运动及自我管理对脊柱疼痛的成本效益分析
Chiropr Man Therap. 2025 Aug 23;33(1):36. doi: 10.1186/s12998-025-00599-8.
4
Revisiting the Valuation of Child Health-Related Quality of Life: Replacing Paired Comparisons With Kaizen Tasks and QALY Scaling With Experience Scaling.重新审视儿童健康相关生活质量的评估:用改善任务取代配对比较,用经验量表取代质量调整生命年量表。
Med Care. 2025 Oct 1;63(10):771-778. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0000000000002200. Epub 2025 Aug 18.
5
Validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Hungarian version of the spine oncology study group outcomes questionnaire.匈牙利版脊柱肿瘤学研究组结局问卷的效度、信度和反应度
Eur Spine J. 2025 Aug 18. doi: 10.1007/s00586-025-09255-4.
6
Longitudinal patient outcomes over 18 months following a hip, clinical vertebral, distal forearm, or proximal humerus fracture in the United States: results from the ICUROS US study.美国髋部、临床椎体、前臂远端或肱骨近端骨折后18个月的纵向患者预后:ICUROS美国研究结果
JBMR Plus. 2025 May 30;9(7):ziaf077. doi: 10.1093/jbmrpl/ziaf077. eCollection 2025 Jul.
7
Empowering safety managers to champion the implementation of smoking cessation services in the construction industry: Protocol for a sequential multiple assignment randomized trial.赋予安全管理人员在建筑行业倡导实施戒烟服务的权力:一项序贯多重分配随机试验方案
PLoS One. 2025 Jun 9;20(6):e0324717. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0324717. eCollection 2025.
8
Implications of sociodemographic and clinical factors on symptom burden: Age-specific survivorship care in the primary central nervous system tumor population.社会人口学和临床因素对症状负担的影响:原发性中枢神经系统肿瘤人群的特定年龄生存护理。
Neurooncol Pract. 2024 Nov 26;12(3):498-510. doi: 10.1093/nop/npae116. eCollection 2025 Jun.
9
Clinical and cost-effectiveness of detailed anomaly ultrasound screening in the first trimester: a mixed-methods study.孕早期详细异常超声筛查的临床效果及成本效益:一项混合方法研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(22):1-250. doi: 10.3310/NLTP7102.
10
Health Risk and the Value of Life.健康风险与生命价值。
J Public Econ. 2025 May;245. doi: 10.1016/j.jpubeco.2025.105346. Epub 2025 Apr 3.