• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

EQ-5D健康状态的估值:美国和英国有所不同吗?

Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?

作者信息

Johnson Jeffrey A, Luo Nan, Shaw James W, Kind Paul, Coons Stephen Joel

机构信息

Institute of Health Economics and University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.

出版信息

Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004.

DOI:10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004
PMID:15725978
Abstract

PURPOSE

We sought to compare directly elicited valuations for EQ-5D health states between the US and UK general adult populations.

METHODS

We analyzed data from 2 EQ-5D valuation studies where, using similar time trade-off protocols, values for 42 common health states were elicited from representative samples of the US and UK general adult populations. First, US and UK population mean valuations were estimated and compared for each health state. Second, random-effect models were used to compare the US and UK valuations while adjusting for known predictors of EQ-5D valuations (ie, age, sex, health state descriptors) and to investigate whether and how the valuations differ.

RESULTS

Population mean valuations of the 42 health states ranged from -0.38 to 0.88 for the United States and from -0.54 to 0.88 for the United Kingdom, with the US mean scores being numerically higher than the UK for 39 health states (mean difference: 0.11; range: -0.01 to 0.25). After adjusting for the main effects of known predictors, the average difference in valuations was 0.10 (P < 0.001). The magnitude of the difference in the US and UK valuations was not constant across EQ-5D health states; greater differences in valuations were present in health states characterized by extreme problems.

CONCLUSIONS

Meaningful differences exist in directly elicited TTO valuations of EQ-5D health states between the US and UK general populations. Therefore, EQ-5D index scores generated using valuations from the US general population should be used for studies aiming to reflect health state preferences of the US general public.

摘要

目的

我们试图直接比较美国和英国普通成年人群对EQ-5D健康状态的估值。

方法

我们分析了两项EQ-5D估值研究的数据,这两项研究使用了类似的时间权衡协议,从美国和英国普通成年人群的代表性样本中得出了42种常见健康状态的价值。首先,估计并比较美国和英国人群对每种健康状态的平均估值。其次,使用随机效应模型比较美国和英国的估值,同时调整EQ-5D估值的已知预测因素(即年龄、性别、健康状态描述符),并调查估值是否存在差异以及如何存在差异。

结果

42种健康状态的人群平均估值在美国为-0.38至0.88,在英国为-0.54至0.88,其中39种健康状态的美国平均得分在数值上高于英国(平均差异:0.11;范围:-0.01至0.25)。在调整已知预测因素的主要影响后,估值的平均差异为0.10(P < 0.001)。美国和英国估值的差异幅度在EQ-5D健康状态中并非恒定不变;在以极端问题为特征的健康状态中,估值差异更大。

结论

美国和英国普通人群对EQ-5D健康状态的直接得出的时间权衡估值存在显著差异。因此,使用美国普通人群估值生成的EQ-5D指数得分应用于旨在反映美国普通公众健康状态偏好的研究。

相似文献

1
Valuations of EQ-5D health states: are the United States and United Kingdom different?EQ-5D健康状态的估值:美国和英国有所不同吗?
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):221-8. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00004.
2
A comparison of United States and United Kingdom EQ-5D health states valuations using a nonparametric Bayesian method.采用非参数贝叶斯方法对美国和英国 EQ-5D 健康状态估值进行比较。
Stat Med. 2010 Jul 10;29(15):1622-34. doi: 10.1002/sim.3874.
3
US valuation of the EQ-5D health states: development and testing of the D1 valuation model.美国EQ-5D健康状态的估值:D1估值模型的开发与测试
Med Care. 2005 Mar;43(3):203-20. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200503000-00003.
4
Comparison of different valuation methods for population health status measured by the EQ-5D in three European countries.比较三种欧洲国家用 EQ-5D 衡量的人口健康状况的不同评估方法。
Value Health. 2009 Jul-Aug;12(5):750-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00509.x.
5
Quality-of-life valuations of advanced breast cancer by New Zealand women.新西兰女性对晚期乳腺癌的生活质量评估。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2006;24(3):281-92. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200624030-00007.
6
Determinants of time trade-off valuations for EQ-5D-5L health states: data from the Canadian EQ-5D-5L valuation study.EQ-5D-5L健康状态的时间权衡估值的决定因素:来自加拿大EQ-5D-5L估值研究的数据。
Qual Life Res. 2016 Jul;25(7):1679-85. doi: 10.1007/s11136-015-1203-4. Epub 2015 Dec 10.
7
Modelling valuations for Eq-5d health states: an alternative model using differences in valuations.对EQ-5D健康状态进行估值建模:一种使用估值差异的替代模型。
Med Care. 2002 May;40(5):442-6. doi: 10.1097/00005650-200205000-00009.
8
Valuation of EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Youth Version (EQ-5D-Y) and EuroQol Five-Dimensional Questionnaire, Three-Level Version (EQ-5D-3L) Health States: The Impact of Wording and Perspective.欧洲五维健康量表青年版(EQ-5D-Y)和欧洲五维健康量表 3 级版(EQ-5D-3L)健康状态的估值:措辞和视角的影响。
Value Health. 2018 Nov;21(11):1291-1298. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2018.05.002. Epub 2018 Aug 8.
9
Bayesian nonparametric estimation of EQ-5D utilities for United States using the existing United Kingdom data.利用英国现有数据对美国EQ-5D效用进行贝叶斯非参数估计。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017 Oct 6;15(1):195. doi: 10.1186/s12955-017-0770-1.
10
Hispanic valuation of the EQ-5D health states: a social value set for Latin Americans.西班牙裔对EQ-5D健康状态的估值:拉丁美洲人的社会价值集。
Value Health. 2008 Dec;11(7):1170-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00349.x. Epub 2008 May 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Developing an EQ-5D-5L Value Set for Singapore.为新加坡制定EQ-5D-5L价值集。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2025 Aug 29. doi: 10.1007/s40273-025-01519-7.
2
Preferences for health-related quality of life: do they vary by age? A systematic literature review on the EQ-5D measure.健康相关生活质量的偏好:它们会因年龄而异吗?关于EQ-5D量表的系统文献综述。
Eur J Health Econ. 2025 Mar 25. doi: 10.1007/s10198-025-01766-7.
3
No difference in postoperative patient satisfaction rates between mechanical and kinematic alignment total knee arthroplasty: A systematic review.
机械对线与运动学对线全膝关节置换术后患者满意度无差异:一项系统评价。
J Exp Orthop. 2024 Jul 24;11(3):e12101. doi: 10.1002/jeo2.12101. eCollection 2024 Jul.
4
The EORTC QLU-C10D: the Hong Kong valuation study.EORTC QLU-C10D:香港评估研究。
Eur J Health Econ. 2024 Jul;25(5):889-901. doi: 10.1007/s10198-023-01632-4. Epub 2023 Sep 28.
5
A lack of financial planning predicts increased mortality risk: Evidence from cohort studies in the United Kingdom and United States.缺乏财务规划预示着更高的死亡风险:来自英国和美国队列研究的证据。
PLoS One. 2023 Sep 27;18(9):e0290506. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0290506. eCollection 2023.
6
Conceptual Framework for Optimised Proxy Value Set Selection Through Supra-National Value Set Development for the EQ-5D Instruments.通过超国家 EQ-5D 工具值集开发优化代理值集选择的概念框架。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2022 Dec;40(12):1221-1234. doi: 10.1007/s40273-022-01194-y. Epub 2022 Oct 6.
7
Disability specific equivalence scales: a case-control approach applied to the cost of acquired brain injuries.特定残疾等效尺度:应用于获得性脑损伤成本的病例对照研究方法。
Int J Health Econ Manag. 2023 Dec;23(4):643-672. doi: 10.1007/s10754-022-09332-x. Epub 2022 May 24.
8
A head-to-head comparison of the EQ-5D-3L index scores derived from the two EQ-5D-3L value sets for China.中国两种 EQ-5D-3L 价值体系导出的 EQ-5D-3L 指数得分的头对头比较。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 May 19;20(1):80. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01988-w.
9
Rural population's preferences matter: a value set for the EQ-5D-3L health states for China's rural population.农村人口的偏好很重要:中国农村人口的 EQ-5D-3L 健康状况的价值设定。
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2022 Jan 29;20(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s12955-022-01917-x.
10
Valuing informal carers' quality of life using best-worst scaling-Finnish preference weights for the Adult Social Care Outcomes Toolkit for carers (ASCOT-Carer).采用最佳最差标度法评估非正规护工的生活质量——针对护工的成人社会护理结果工具包(ASCOT-Carer)的芬兰偏好权重。
Eur J Health Econ. 2022 Apr;23(3):357-374. doi: 10.1007/s10198-021-01356-3. Epub 2021 Sep 1.