Ahmad Christopher S, Wang Vincent M, Sugalski Matthew T, Levine William N, Bigliani Louis U
Center for Shoulder, Elbow, and Sports Medicine, Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Columbia University, 622 W. 168th Street, PH-11th Center, New York, NY 10032, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005 Jan-Feb;14(1 Suppl S):12S-18S. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2004.09.015.
Nonanatomic capsulorrhaphy procedures and reconstructions used to treat shoulder instability create mechanical alterations to the glenohumeral joint that lead to eventual arthrosis. Current capsulorrhaphy procedures have evolved toward restoring normal anatomy and have stimulated relevant anatomic research. Analysis of the subscapularis insertion has demonstrated a superior tendinous insertion and an inferior muscular insertion with the inferior glenohumeral capsule consistently located beneath the muscular insertion of the subscapularis. In addition, 2 types of inferior humeral capsular attachments have been identified. The anterior capsular insertion may bifurcate into a superior internal fold adjacent to the articular cartilage and an inferior external fold on the humeral surgical neck. Alternatively, the capsule may insert over a broad area on the surgical neck. Therefore, releasing the muscular portion of the subscapularis and both capsular folds or the entire broad capsular insertion enhances proper shifting of the capsule during laterally based capsulorrhaphy procedures. Biomechanical studies allow direct study of the different parameters involved in capsulorrhaphy procedures, and several recent studies have improved our understanding. Anterior tightening procedures such as the Putti-Platt or Magnuson-Stack procedure, as well as a tight Bankart repair, result in a loss of external rotation and maximum elevation. Furthermore, this type of operative intervention creates greater posterior joint loads and abnormal posteroinferior humeral head subluxation, leading to pain and arthrosis. Anatomic capsulorrhaphy procedures produce more normal joint mechanics. Current and future studies will evaluate new arthroscopic capsulorrhaphy techniques.
用于治疗肩关节不稳的非解剖性关节囊缝合术和重建术会对盂肱关节造成机械性改变,最终导致关节病。目前的关节囊缝合术已朝着恢复正常解剖结构发展,并推动了相关解剖学研究。对肩胛下肌止点的分析表明,其上方为腱性止点,下方为肌性止点,下盂肱关节囊始终位于肩胛下肌的肌性止点下方。此外,已确定了两种类型的肱骨下关节囊附着。前关节囊止点可分为与关节软骨相邻的上方内侧皱襞和肱骨外科颈上的下方外侧皱襞。或者,关节囊可在外科颈上广泛区域附着。因此,在基于外侧的关节囊缝合术中,松解肩胛下肌的肌性部分以及两个关节囊皱襞或整个广泛的关节囊附着,可增强关节囊的正确移位。生物力学研究允许直接研究关节囊缝合术中涉及的不同参数,最近的几项研究增进了我们的理解。诸如Putti-Platt或Magnuson-Stack手术等前方收紧手术以及牢固的Bankart修复,会导致外旋和最大抬高丧失。此外,这种手术干预会产生更大的后方关节负荷和肱骨头后下方异常半脱位,导致疼痛和关节病。解剖性关节囊缝合术可产生更正常的关节力学。当前和未来的研究将评估新的关节镜下关节囊缝合技术。