Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2012 Jul;21(7):902-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2011.05.005. Epub 2011 Aug 10.
Arthroscopic repair techniques for anterior instability most commonly address only the anterior band of the inferior glenohumeral ligament. This study quantitatively evaluated and compared the combined anterior and posterior arthroscopic plication by repairing both the anterior and posterior bands of the inferior glenohumeral ligament with the anterior arthroscopic plication alone.
Six cadaveric shoulders were tested in 60° of glenohumeral abduction with 22 N of compressive force in the coronal plane for intact, after anterior capsular stretching, after anterior repair, and after posterior arthroscopic repair. Range of motion, glenohumeral translation, and glenohumeral kinematics throughout the rotational range of motion were measured with a MicroScribe 3DLX (Immersion, San Jose, CA, USA). Glenohumeral contact pressure and area were measured with a pressure measurement system (Tekscan Inc, South Boston, MA, USA).
Stretching the anterior capsule significantly increased external rotation and anterior translation (P < .05). After anterior plication, external rotation was restored to the intact condition, and anterior translation was significantly decreased compared with stretched condition (P < .05). The combined anterior and posterior plication significantly decreased internal rotation compared with the intact condition. The anterior plication shifted the humeral head posterior in external rotation, whereas the combined anterior and posterior plication shifted the humeral head anterior in internal rotation (P < .05). Both repairs led to a decrease in glenohumeral contact area at 45° external rotation (P < .07).
The addition of a posterior plication to anterior plication for anterior instability has no biomechanical advantage over a typical arthroscopic anterior repair for anterior glenohumeral instability.
关节镜下修复前不稳定的技术通常只处理下盂肱韧带的前束。本研究通过修复下盂肱韧带的前束和后束,定量评估和比较了单纯前关节镜下修补术和单纯前关节镜下修补术。
6 具尸体肩关节在冠状面施加 22N 压缩力,在 60°盂肱关节外展下进行测试,包括完整、前囊拉伸后、前修复后和后关节镜下修复后。使用 MicroScribe 3DLX(Immersion,San Jose,CA,USA)测量运动范围、盂肱关节平移和整个旋转运动范围内的盂肱关节运动学。使用压力测量系统(Tekscan Inc,South Boston,MA,USA)测量盂肱关节接触压力和面积。
拉伸前囊可显著增加外旋和前向平移(P<0.05)。前修补后,外旋恢复到完整状态,与拉伸状态相比,前向平移显著减少(P<0.05)。与完整状态相比,前-后联合修补显著减少内旋。前修补术使肱骨头在外旋时向后移位,而前-后联合修补术使肱骨头在内旋时向前移位(P<0.05)。两种修复均导致 45°外旋时盂肱接触面积减小(P<0.07)。
对于前不稳定,在前修补的基础上增加后修补,与典型的前关节镜下修复术相比,在前盂肱关节不稳定方面没有生物力学优势。