• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医学生中抄袭行为的发生率。

Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students.

作者信息

Bilić-Zulle Lidija, Frković Vedran, Turk Tamara, Azman Josip, Petrovecki Mladen

机构信息

Department of Computer Science, Rijeka University School of Medicine, Brace Branchetta 20, 51000 Rijeka, Croatia.

出版信息

Croat Med J. 2005 Feb;46(1):126-31.

PMID:15726686
Abstract

AIM

To determine the prevalence of plagiarism among medical students in writing essays.

METHODS

During two academic years, 198 second year medical students attending Medical Informatics course wrote an essay on one of four offered articles. Two of the source articles were available in an electronic form and two in printed form. Two (one electronic and one paper article) were considered less complex and the other two more complex. The essays were examined using plagiarism detection software "WCopyfind," which counted the number of matching phrases with six or more words. Plagiarism rate, expressed as the percentage of the plagiarized text, was calculated as a ratio of the absolute number of matching words and the total number of words in the essay.

RESULTS

Only 17 (9%) of students did not plagiarize at all and 68 (34%) plagiarized less than 10% of the text. The average plagiarism rate (% of plagiarized text) was 19% (5-95% percentile=0-88). Students who were strictly warned not to plagiarize had a higher total word count in their essays than students who were not warned (P=0.002) but there was no difference between them in the rate of plagiarism. Students with higher grades in Medical Informatics exam plagiarized less than those with lower grades (P=0.015). Gender, subject source, and complexity had no influence on the plagiarism rate.

CONCLUSIONS

Plagiarism in writing essays is common among medical students. An explicit warning is not enough to deter students from plagiarism. Detection software can be used to trace and evaluate the rate of plagiarism in written student assays.

摘要

目的

确定医学生撰写论文时的抄袭发生率。

方法

在两个学年期间,198名参加医学信息学课程的二年级医学生就四篇提供的文章之一撰写一篇论文。其中两篇源文章有电子版本,另外两篇有印刷版本。两篇(一篇电子文章和一篇纸质文章)被认为难度较低,另外两篇难度较高。使用抄袭检测软件“WCopyfind”检查论文,该软件统计六个或更多单词的匹配短语数量。抄袭率以抄袭文本的百分比表示,计算方法为匹配单词的绝对数量与论文总单词数量的比率。

结果

只有17名(9%)学生完全没有抄袭,68名(34%)学生的抄袭文本少于10%。平均抄袭率(抄袭文本的百分比)为19%(第5 - 95百分位数 = 0 - 88)。被严格警告不得抄袭的学生所写论文的总字数比未被警告的学生多(P = 0.002),但他们的抄袭率没有差异。医学信息学考试成绩较高的学生抄袭比成绩较低的学生少(P = 0.015)。性别、主题来源和难度对抄袭率没有影响。

结论

医学生撰写论文时抄袭现象普遍。明确警告不足以阻止学生抄袭。检测软件可用于追踪和评估学生书面作业中的抄袭率。

相似文献

1
Prevalence of plagiarism among medical students.医学生中抄袭行为的发生率。
Croat Med J. 2005 Feb;46(1):126-31.
2
Is there an effective approach to deterring students from plagiarizing?有没有一种有效的方法来阻止学生抄袭?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Mar;14(1):139-47. doi: 10.1007/s11948-007-9037-2. Epub 2007 Nov 8.
3
Plagiarism in residency application essays.住院医师申请论文中的剽窃行为。
Ann Intern Med. 2010 Jul 20;153(2):112-20. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-153-2-201007200-00007.
4
Prevalence of plagiarism in recent submissions to the Croatian Medical Journal.克罗地亚医学杂志近期投稿中的剽窃现象的流行率。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):223-39. doi: 10.1007/s11948-011-9347-2. Epub 2011 Dec 30.
5
Academic performance and scientific involvement of final year medical students coming from urban and rural backgrounds.来自城市和农村背景的医学专业最后一年学生的学业成绩和科研参与情况。
Rural Remote Health. 2006 Apr-Jun;6(2):530. Epub 2006 Apr 20.
6
Perceptions of plagiarism in the use of other authors' language.对使用其他作者语言时抄袭行为的认知。
Fam Med. 1994 Jun;26(6):356-60.
7
Student's plagiarism--a challenge for paramedic educators.学生抄袭——护理人员教育工作者面临的挑战。
Nucl Med Rev Cent East Eur. 2006;9(1):89-91.
8
The Cloze procedure as a test of plagiarism: the influence of text readability.作为剽窃检测手段的完形填空测试:文本可读性的影响
J Psychol. 2005 May;139(3):221-31. doi: 10.3200/JRLP.139.3.221-232.
9
Plagiarism: a case study of quality improvement in a taught postgraduate programme.抄袭:一个教学型研究生课程质量改进的案例研究。
Med Teach. 2011;33(7):e375-81. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2011.579201.
10
Plagiarism in Personal Statements of Anesthesiology Residency Applicants.麻醉学住院医师申请个人陈述中的抄袭现象。
A A Case Rep. 2016 Feb 15;6(4):103-5. doi: 10.1213/XAA.0000000000000202.

引用本文的文献

1
Describing the Attributional Nature of Academic Dishonesty.描述学术不诚实行为的归因本质。
Med Sci Educ. 2019 Feb 19;29(2):577-581. doi: 10.1007/s40670-019-00710-8. eCollection 2019 Jun.
2
Comprehensive Survey of Plagiarism in Iran.伊朗抄袭行为综合调查。
Pak J Med Sci. 2020 Nov-Dec;36(7):1441-1448. doi: 10.12669/pjms.36.7.3456.
3
Plagiarism Perceptions and Attitudes Among Medical Students in Saudi Arabia.沙特阿拉伯医学生对抄袭的认知与态度
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2020 Feb;20(1):e77-e82. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2020.20.01.011. Epub 2020 Mar 9.
4
Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing.知识、态度和行为:作者参与 AuthorAID 研究写作 MOOC 后报告的剽窃情况。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2020 Apr;26(2):1067-1088. doi: 10.1007/s11948-020-00198-1. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
5
The impact of gender and academic achievement on the violation of academic integrity for medical faculty students, a descriptive cross-sectional survey study.性别和学业成绩对医学生学术诚信违规行为的影响:一项描述性横断面调查研究。
BMC Med Educ. 2019 Nov 20;19(1):427. doi: 10.1186/s12909-019-1865-7.
6
Attitudes and Knowledge About Plagiarism Among University Students: Cross-Sectional Survey at the University of Split, Croatia.大学生对剽窃的态度和认知:克罗地亚斯普利特大学的横断面调查。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2019 Oct;25(5):1467-1483. doi: 10.1007/s11948-018-0073-x. Epub 2018 Oct 24.
7
Perceptions of Plagiarism Among Medical and Nursing Students in Erbil, Iraq.伊拉克埃尔比勒医学与护理专业学生对抄袭行为的认知
Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2018 May;18(2):e196-e201. doi: 10.18295/squmj.2018.18.02.012. Epub 2018 Sep 9.
8
Descriptors for unprofessional behaviours of medical students: a systematic review and categorisation.描述医学生非专业行为的术语:系统评价与分类。
BMC Med Educ. 2017 Sep 15;17(1):164. doi: 10.1186/s12909-017-0997-x.
9
Interventions to prevent misconduct and promote integrity in research and publication.预防科研与出版领域不当行为并促进诚信的干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):MR000038. doi: 10.1002/14651858.MR000038.pub2.
10
Research Misconduct in the Croatian Scientific Community: A Survey Assessing the Forms and Characteristics of Research Misconduct.克罗地亚科学界的研究不端行为:一项评估研究不端行为形式与特征的调查
Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Feb;23(1):165-181. doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9767-0. Epub 2016 Mar 3.