• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

不道德基因:它真的存在吗?

The immoral gene: does it really exist?

作者信息

Zimmer Franz-Josef, Sethmann Svenja

机构信息

Grünecker, Kinkeldey, Stockmair & Schwanhäusser, Law Firm, Munich, Germany.

出版信息

Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jan;11(1):97-104. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0061-9.

DOI:10.1007/s11948-005-0061-9
PMID:15727005
Abstract

Over the last years several European patents were opposed for protecting technology violating the morality requirement under Article 53(a) EPC. Attempts have been made by the Appeal Boards of the European Patent Office (EPO), as well as by amendments introduced into the Implementing Regulations of the European Patent Convention (EPC), to address this sensitive patentability requirement more precisely. The most recent hot topic coming up in this context is the patentability of stem cells. It is to be expected that this discussion will still go on in the field of biotechnological inventions for the next several years.

摘要

在过去几年中,多项欧洲专利因保护违反《欧洲专利公约》(EPC)第53(a)条道德要求的技术而遭到反对。欧洲专利局(EPO)上诉委员会以及对《欧洲专利公约》(EPC)实施细则的修订都试图更精确地处理这一敏感的可专利性要求。在此背景下出现的最新热门话题是干细胞的可专利性。预计在未来几年里,生物技术发明领域的这场讨论仍将继续。

相似文献

1
The immoral gene: does it really exist?不道德基因:它真的存在吗?
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jan;11(1):97-104. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0061-9.
2
Ethics and patentability in biotechnology.生物技术中的伦理与可专利性
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jan;11(1):105-11. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0062-8.
3
Impact of bioethics on patentability of inventions.生物伦理学对发明可专利性的影响。
Indian J Med Ethics. 2010 Jan-Mar;7(1):14-7. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2010.005.
4
Biotechnology patenting policy in the European Union--as exemplified by the development in Germany.欧盟的生物技术专利政策——以德国的发展为例。
Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol. 2007;107:13-39. doi: 10.1007/10_2007_049.
5
Bio-patents, law and ethics. Critical analysis of the EU biotechnology directive.生物专利、法律与伦理。欧盟生物技术指令的批判性分析。
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2003 Jul-Dec(19):187-203.
6
The ethics of patenting biotechnology.
Leg Ethics. 2002 Spring;5(1-2):14-7. doi: 10.1080/1460728x.2002.11424155.
7
Patentability of life and ethics.生命的可专利性与伦理
C R Biol. 2003 Oct-Nov;326(10-11):1127-34. doi: 10.1016/j.crvi.2003.09.016.
8
Regulating morality through patent law. Critique of the EC Directive.通过专利法规范道德。对欧盟指令的批判。
Rev Derecho Genoma Hum. 2000 Jan-Jun(12):141-71.
9
Ethico-legal issues in biomedicine patenting: a patent professional viewpoint.生物医学专利中的伦理法律问题:专利专业人士视角
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jan;11(1):117-36. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0064-6.
10
Ethical questions to ponder in the European stem cell patent debate.欧洲干细胞专利辩论中需要思考的伦理问题。
J Biolaw Bus. 2006;9(3):12-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Patent Ethics: The Misalignment of Views Between the Patent System and the Wider Society.专利伦理:专利制度与更广泛的社会之间观点的错位。
Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1551-1576. doi: 10.1007/s11948-017-9956-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
2
Observations on a meeting on the ethics of intellectual property rights and patents.
Sci Eng Ethics. 2005 Jan;11(1):151-8. doi: 10.1007/s11948-005-0066-4.