Mol Peter G M, Wieringa Jaap E, Nannanpanday Prashant V, Gans Rijk O B, Degener John E, Laseur M, Haaijer-Ruskamp Flora M
Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
J Antimicrob Chemother. 2005 Apr;55(4):550-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dki037. Epub 2005 Feb 22.
This study investigated the impact of a combined intervention strategy to improve antimicrobial prescribing at University Hospital Groningen. For the intervention, the antimicrobial treatment guidelines were updated and disseminated in paperback and electronic format. The credibility of the guidelines was improved by consultation with users. In a second phase, academic detailing (AD) was used to improve specific areas of low compliance with the guidelines.
Prescribing data were prospectively collected for 2869 patients receiving 7471 prescriptions for an antimicrobial for an infection covered by the guidelines between July 2001 and September 2003. After collection of baseline data, the guidelines were actively disseminated in February 2002. Next, after a 5 month interval, a second intervention, i.e. an AD approach, addressed suboptimal prescribing of ciprofloxacin and co-amoxiclav. Segmented regression analysis was used to analyse the interrupted time-series data.
At baseline, compliance with the drug choice guidelines was 67%. The first intervention showed a significant change in the level of compliance of +15.5% (95% CI: 8%; 23%). AD did not lead to statistically significant additional changes in already high levels +12.5% (95% CI:-3%; 28%) of compliance. Post-intervention compliance was stable at 86%.
Updating the guidelines in close collaboration with the specialists involved followed by active dissemination proved to be an efficient way to improve compliance with guideline recommendations. An 86% compliance level was achieved in this study without compulsory measures. A ceiling effect may have limited the added value of AD.
本研究调查了联合干预策略对格罗宁根大学医院抗菌药物处方的影响。对于干预措施,抗菌治疗指南以平装本和电子形式进行了更新和传播。通过与用户协商提高了指南的可信度。在第二阶段,采用学术推广(AD)来改善指南依从性较低的特定领域。
前瞻性收集了2001年7月至2003年9月期间2869例患者接受指南涵盖感染的抗菌药物处方7471张的处方数据。收集基线数据后,于2002年2月积极传播指南。接下来,在间隔5个月后,进行了第二项干预措施,即采用AD方法解决环丙沙星和阿莫西林克拉维酸处方欠佳的问题。采用分段回归分析来分析中断时间序列数据。
基线时,药物选择指南的依从率为67%。第一次干预使依从水平显著提高了15.5%(95%可信区间:8%;23%)。AD并未导致在已经较高的依从水平(12.5%,95%可信区间:-3%;28%)上出现统计学上显著的额外变化。干预后的依从率稳定在86%。
与相关专家密切合作更新指南并积极传播,被证明是提高对指南建议依从性的有效方法。本研究在没有强制措施的情况下实现了86%的依从率。天花板效应可能限制了AD的附加价值。