Chikazoe Junichi, Konishi Seiki, Asari Tomoki, Jimura Koji, Miyashita Yasushi
The University of Tokyo School of Medicine, Hongo, Tokyo, Japan.
J Cogn Neurosci. 2007 Jan;19(1):69-80. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2007.19.1.69.
The go/no-go task, which effectively taps the ability to inhibit prepotent response tendency, has consistently activated the lateral prefrontal cortex, particularly the right inferior frontal gyrus (rIFG). On the other hand, rIFG activation has rarely been reported in the antisaccade task, seemingly an oculomotor version of the manual go/no-go task. One possible explanation for the variable IFG activation is the modality difference of the two tasks: The go/no-go task is performed manually, whereas the antisaccade task is performed in the oculomotor modality. Another explanation is that these two tasks have different task structures that require different cognitive processes: The traditional antisaccade task requires (i) configuration of a preparatory set prior to antisaccade execution and (ii) response inhibition at the time of antisaccade execution, whereas the go/no-go task requires heightened response inhibition under a minimal preparatory set. To test these possibilities, the traditional antisaccade task was modified in the present functional magnetic resonance imaging study such that it required heightened response inhibition at the time of antisaccade execution under a minimal preparatory set. Prominent activation related to response inhibition was observed in multiple frontoparietal regions, including the rIFG. Moreover, meta-analyses revealed that the rIFG activation in the present study was observed in the go/no-go tasks but not in the traditional antisaccade task, indicating that the rIFG activation was sensitive to the task structure difference, but not to the response modality difference. These results suggest that the rIFG is part of a network active during response inhibition across different response modalities.
停止信号任务能够有效检验抑制优势反应倾向的能力,该任务一直激活外侧前额叶皮质,尤其是右侧额下回(rIFG)。另一方面,在反眼跳任务中,rIFG激活的报道却很少,反眼跳任务似乎是手动停止信号任务的一种动眼形式。对IFG激活情况存在差异的一种可能解释是这两项任务的模态不同:停止信号任务是手动执行的,而反眼跳任务是以动眼模态执行的。另一种解释是这两项任务具有不同的任务结构,需要不同的认知过程:传统的反眼跳任务要求(i)在执行反眼跳之前配置一个准备集,以及(ii)在执行反眼跳时进行反应抑制,而停止信号任务要求在最小准备集下增强反应抑制。为了检验这些可能性,在本功能磁共振成像研究中对传统反眼跳任务进行了修改,使其在最小准备集下执行反眼跳时需要增强反应抑制。在包括rIFG在内的多个额顶叶区域观察到了与反应抑制相关的显著激活。此外,荟萃分析显示,在本研究中,rIFG激活出现在停止信号任务中,而不是传统反眼跳任务中,这表明rIFG激活对任务结构差异敏感,而不是对反应模态差异敏感。这些结果表明,rIFG是在不同反应模态的反应抑制过程中活跃的神经网络的一部分。