Rosci C, Sacco D, Laiacona M, Capitani E
Clinic for Nervous Diseases, S. Paolo Hospital Milan University, Via Di Rudinì 8, I-20142, Milan, Italy.
Neurol Sci. 2005 Feb;25(6):322-30. doi: 10.1007/s10072-004-0365-6.
A. R. Luria introduced the interpretation of a meaningful picture as a tool for assessing pre-frontal impairment. We gave this test to 196 normal adults, who were asked to communicate what was happening in the portrayed scene (a boy chases a mouse hidden under a cupboard, while three frightened girls assist). The same subjects were given two other frontal tests (verbal fluency on phonemic cue and Trail Making Test (TMT)) and Raven's Matrices. Twenty-three normal subjects (12%) failed to correctly interpret the picture. We also examined 20 patients whose brain lesion encroached upon pre-frontal areas, in order to check if this version of the test could be easily administered to this type of patient, and if its difficulty level was appropriate for avoiding ceiling and floor effects. Twelve patients were unable to interpret the picture (60%). A similar failure rate was observed with the same subjects on verbal fluency and TMT, while Raven's Matrices were less impaired (35%). Some dissociation was found between Picture Interpretation and the TMT. The Italian version of the Picture Interpretation Test is suitable for the examination of pre-frontal patients.
A. R. 卢里亚引入了将对有意义图片的解读作为评估前额叶损伤的一种工具。我们对196名正常成年人进行了这项测试,要求他们讲述所描绘场景(一个男孩在追赶藏在橱柜下的老鼠,同时有三个受惊的女孩在帮忙)中发生了什么。同样这些受试者还接受了另外两项前额叶测试(基于音素线索的言语流畅性测试和连线测验(TMT))以及瑞文推理测验。23名正常受试者(12%)未能正确解读图片。我们还检查了20名脑损伤侵犯前额叶区域的患者,以检验该版本的测试是否能轻松应用于这类患者,以及其难度水平是否适合避免天花板效应和地板效应。12名患者无法解读图片(60%)。在言语流畅性和TMT测试中,同样这些受试者也出现了类似的失败率,而瑞文推理测验的受损程度较小(35%)。在图片解读和TMT之间发现了一些分离现象。图片解读测试的意大利语版本适用于前额叶患者的检查。