• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

人际风格量表与五因素模型。

The Interpersonal Style Inventory and the five-factor model.

作者信息

Lorr M, Youniss R P, Kluth C

机构信息

Catholic University of America, Life Cycle Institute, Washington, D.C.

出版信息

J Clin Psychol. 1992 Mar;48(2):202-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199203)48:2<202::aid-jclp2270480208>3.0.co;2-p.

DOI:10.1002/1097-4679(199203)48:2<202::aid-jclp2270480208>3.0.co;2-p
PMID:1573019
Abstract

The study examined relations between the 15 scale scores of the Interpersonal Style Inventory (Lorr & Youniss, 1985) and the domain measures of the five-factor model provided by the NEO Personality Inventory (Costa & McCrae, 1985). A sample of 236 college students were administered both inventories. A principal component analysis of the 5 NEO-PI domain scores and the 15 ISI scale scores followed by a Varimax rotation disclosed the expected five higher-order factors. Four factors, Neuroticism, Extraversion, Conscientiousness and Ageeableness, were defined by both NEO and ISI scales. Openness to Experience, however, was represented in the ISI by Independence and Directiveness, which define its Autonomy dimension. Thus, the ISI measures four of the five factors assessed by the NEO-PI.

摘要

该研究考察了人际风格量表(洛尔和尤尼斯,1985年)的15个量表得分与新人格量表(科斯塔和麦克雷,1985年)提供的五因素模型的领域测量之间的关系。对236名大学生样本施测了这两个量表。对新人格量表的5个领域得分和人际风格量表的15个量表得分进行主成分分析,随后进行方差最大化旋转,揭示了预期的五个高阶因素。神经质、外向性、尽责性和宜人性这四个因素由新人格量表和人际风格量表共同定义。然而,在人际风格量表中,经验开放性由独立性和指导性来体现,它们定义了其自主性维度。因此,人际风格量表测量了新人格量表所评估的五个因素中的四个。

相似文献

1
The Interpersonal Style Inventory and the five-factor model.人际风格量表与五因素模型。
J Clin Psychol. 1992 Mar;48(2):202-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-4679(199203)48:2<202::aid-jclp2270480208>3.0.co;2-p.
2
[Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].[法国大五人格量表是否评估了大五人格因素以外的其他方面?]
Encephale. 2018 Jun;44(3):208-214. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2017.02.004. Epub 2017 Mar 30.
3
Confounded versus nonconfounded correlations among the neo-personality inventory's domain and facet scales.新人格量表的领域和层面量表之间的混杂相关性与非混杂相关性。
Psychol Rep. 1996 Apr;78(2):627-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1996.78.2.627.
4
Personality and personal projects: linking big five and PAC units of analysis.人格与个人计划:连接大五人格与个人行动过程分析单元
J Pers. 1992 Jun;60(2):501-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00982.x.
5
Correlations between the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and the Neo Personality Inventory facets.迈尔斯-布里格斯性格分类指标与大五人格量表各维度之间的相关性。
Psychol Rep. 1995 Apr;76(2):449-50. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1995.76.2.449.
6
The five and seven factors personality models: differences and similitude between the TCI-R, NEO-FFI-R and ZKPQ-50-CC.五因素和七因素人格模型:TCI-R、NEO-FFI-R 和 ZKPQ-50-CC 之间的差异和相似性。
Span J Psychol. 2011 Nov;14(2):659-66. doi: 10.5209/rev_sjop.2011.v14.n2.14.
7
Personality and mental health: Arabic Scale of Mental Health, Eysenck Personality Questionnaire, and Neo Five Factor Inventory.人格与心理健康:阿拉伯心理健康量表、艾森克人格问卷和大五人格问卷简式量表。
Psychol Rep. 2012 Aug;111(1):75-82. doi: 10.2466/09.02.08.PR0.111.4.75-82.
8
Prospective prediction of college adjustment using self- and informant-rated personality traits.采用自评和他人评定的人格特质对大学生适应情况进行前瞻性预测。
J Pers Assess. 2012;94(6):630-7. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.672506. Epub 2012 Apr 10.
9
Structure of personality disorders from the perspective of the Revised Neo Personality Inventory domain scales and the Psychopathology-5 Scales.从修订版新人格量表领域量表和精神病理学-5量表的角度看人格障碍的结构
Psychol Rep. 1999 Dec;85(3 Pt 2):1119-22. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1999.85.3f.1119.
10
Correlations for scores on the 180-item version of the MMPI-2 and the Neuroticism scale of the NEO-Personality Inventory.明尼苏达多相人格调查表第二版(MMPI - 2)180项版本的得分与大五人格量表(NEO - 人格量表)中的神经质分量表得分之间的相关性。
Psychol Rep. 2002 Feb;90(1):227-30. doi: 10.2466/pr0.2002.90.1.227.